Cargando…

Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence, duration and impact of time delays to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 357 consecutive STEMI patients enrolled in the prospective Special Progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahin, Mohammady, Obeid, Slayman, Hamed, Lotfy, Templin, Christian, Gamperli, Oliver, Nietlispach, Fabian, Maier, Willbald, Yousif, Nooraldaem, Mach, Francois, Roffi, Marco, Windecker, Stephan, Raber, Lorenz, Matter, Christian M., Luscher, Thomas F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118880
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr612w
_version_ 1783275533356761088
author Shahin, Mohammady
Obeid, Slayman
Hamed, Lotfy
Templin, Christian
Gamperli, Oliver
Nietlispach, Fabian
Maier, Willbald
Yousif, Nooraldaem
Mach, Francois
Roffi, Marco
Windecker, Stephan
Raber, Lorenz
Matter, Christian M.
Luscher, Thomas F.
author_facet Shahin, Mohammady
Obeid, Slayman
Hamed, Lotfy
Templin, Christian
Gamperli, Oliver
Nietlispach, Fabian
Maier, Willbald
Yousif, Nooraldaem
Mach, Francois
Roffi, Marco
Windecker, Stephan
Raber, Lorenz
Matter, Christian M.
Luscher, Thomas F.
author_sort Shahin, Mohammady
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence, duration and impact of time delays to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 357 consecutive STEMI patients enrolled in the prospective Special Program University Medicine ACS (SPUM-ACS) cohort were included. In order to identify the causes behind a possible treatment delay, we constructed four different time points which included: 1) symptom onset to hospital arrival, 2) hospital arrival to arrival in the catheterization laboratory, 3) hospital arrival to first balloon inflation, and 4) time from arrival in the catheterization laboratory to first balloon inflation in addition to total ischemic time. Patients were stratified according to a delay > 3 h, > 30 min, > 90 min and > 1 h, respectively and major adverse events at 0, 30 and 365 days were analyzed. RESULTS: Resuscitated STEMI patients (23 patients) and STEMI patients presenting at weekends (101 patients) and to lesser extent at night hours (100 patients) experienced more time delays than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. Median door-to-balloon time averaged 93 min in resuscitated, but 65 min in stable patients. Median door-to-balloon time at weekends and public holidays was 89 min, but 68 min at office hours. Median time from hospital arrival to cathlab arrival at weekends and public holidays was 30 min, but 15 min during office hours. Corresponding times for resuscitated patients was 45 and 15 min in stable patients. Of note, resuscitated patients were late presenters as regards time from symptoms onset to hospital arrival with a median time of 180 min compared to 155 min in stable patients. Median total ischemic time was 225 min for all patients, 223 min at day hours, 239 at night hours, 244 min at weekends, 233 min at office days, 220 min in stable patients and 273 min in resuscitated patients. Patients with STEMI who arrived > 3 h after symptom onset had a higher rate of myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year (1.6% vs. 9% in < 3 h; P = 0.008). Furthermore, STEMI patients who had a delay of > 1 h from cathlab arrival to first balloon inflation had a higher rate of in hospital reinfarction at 0 day (0.6% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.007), MI at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.001) and MI at 1 year (1.4% vs. 1.1% in < 1 h; P = 0.012). Similarly, in these patients, cardiac deaths at 0 day (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) and at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) were higher as were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) at 0 day (1.4% vs. 0.8% in < 1 h; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Resuscitated STEMI patients and those presenting at weekends and to lesser extent at night hours experienced more time delays and longer ischemic time than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. In STEMI patients, any delay in treatment increased their risk of MACCE. Efforts should focus on improving patient’s awareness along with minimizing in-hospital transfer to the catheterization laboratory especially at weekends and in resuscitated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5667705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56677052017-11-08 Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Shahin, Mohammady Obeid, Slayman Hamed, Lotfy Templin, Christian Gamperli, Oliver Nietlispach, Fabian Maier, Willbald Yousif, Nooraldaem Mach, Francois Roffi, Marco Windecker, Stephan Raber, Lorenz Matter, Christian M. Luscher, Thomas F. Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence, duration and impact of time delays to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 357 consecutive STEMI patients enrolled in the prospective Special Program University Medicine ACS (SPUM-ACS) cohort were included. In order to identify the causes behind a possible treatment delay, we constructed four different time points which included: 1) symptom onset to hospital arrival, 2) hospital arrival to arrival in the catheterization laboratory, 3) hospital arrival to first balloon inflation, and 4) time from arrival in the catheterization laboratory to first balloon inflation in addition to total ischemic time. Patients were stratified according to a delay > 3 h, > 30 min, > 90 min and > 1 h, respectively and major adverse events at 0, 30 and 365 days were analyzed. RESULTS: Resuscitated STEMI patients (23 patients) and STEMI patients presenting at weekends (101 patients) and to lesser extent at night hours (100 patients) experienced more time delays than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. Median door-to-balloon time averaged 93 min in resuscitated, but 65 min in stable patients. Median door-to-balloon time at weekends and public holidays was 89 min, but 68 min at office hours. Median time from hospital arrival to cathlab arrival at weekends and public holidays was 30 min, but 15 min during office hours. Corresponding times for resuscitated patients was 45 and 15 min in stable patients. Of note, resuscitated patients were late presenters as regards time from symptoms onset to hospital arrival with a median time of 180 min compared to 155 min in stable patients. Median total ischemic time was 225 min for all patients, 223 min at day hours, 239 at night hours, 244 min at weekends, 233 min at office days, 220 min in stable patients and 273 min in resuscitated patients. Patients with STEMI who arrived > 3 h after symptom onset had a higher rate of myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year (1.6% vs. 9% in < 3 h; P = 0.008). Furthermore, STEMI patients who had a delay of > 1 h from cathlab arrival to first balloon inflation had a higher rate of in hospital reinfarction at 0 day (0.6% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.007), MI at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0% in < 1 h; P = 0.001) and MI at 1 year (1.4% vs. 1.1% in < 1 h; P = 0.012). Similarly, in these patients, cardiac deaths at 0 day (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) and at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0.6% in < 1 h; P = 0.035) were higher as were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) at 0 day (1.4% vs. 0.8% in < 1 h; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Resuscitated STEMI patients and those presenting at weekends and to lesser extent at night hours experienced more time delays and longer ischemic time than stable patients and those presenting at office hours. In STEMI patients, any delay in treatment increased their risk of MACCE. Efforts should focus on improving patient’s awareness along with minimizing in-hospital transfer to the catheterization laboratory especially at weekends and in resuscitated patients. Elmer Press 2017-10 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5667705/ /pubmed/29118880 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr612w Text en Copyright 2017, Shahin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shahin, Mohammady
Obeid, Slayman
Hamed, Lotfy
Templin, Christian
Gamperli, Oliver
Nietlispach, Fabian
Maier, Willbald
Yousif, Nooraldaem
Mach, Francois
Roffi, Marco
Windecker, Stephan
Raber, Lorenz
Matter, Christian M.
Luscher, Thomas F.
Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Occurrence and Impact of Time Delay to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort occurrence and impact of time delay to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118880
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr612w
work_keys_str_mv AT shahinmohammady occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT obeidslayman occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT hamedlotfy occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT templinchristian occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT gamperlioliver occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT nietlispachfabian occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT maierwillbald occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT yousifnooraldaem occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT machfrancois occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT roffimarco occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT windeckerstephan occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT raberlorenz occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT matterchristianm occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT luscherthomasf occurrenceandimpactoftimedelaytoprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction