Cargando…

Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease

OBJECTIVES: To facilitate self-help, the Finnish Ménière’s Federation (FMF) provides various kinds of support to persons with Ménière’s disease (MD), which includes patient magazines (PM) and Internet-based peer support (iPS). The current study aimed to evaluate the benefits reported by MD patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manchaiah, Vinaya, Pyykkö, Ilmari, Zou, Jing, Levo, Hilla, Kentala, Erna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138539
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S142257
_version_ 1783275550853300224
author Manchaiah, Vinaya
Pyykkö, Ilmari
Zou, Jing
Levo, Hilla
Kentala, Erna
author_facet Manchaiah, Vinaya
Pyykkö, Ilmari
Zou, Jing
Levo, Hilla
Kentala, Erna
author_sort Manchaiah, Vinaya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To facilitate self-help, the Finnish Ménière’s Federation (FMF) provides various kinds of support to persons with Ménière’s disease (MD), which includes patient magazines (PM) and Internet-based peer support (iPS). The current study aimed to evaluate the benefits reported by MD patients in terms of PM and iPS. METHOD: The study used a cross-sectional survey design with a mixture of structured and open-ended questions administered online. A sample of 185 patients from the FMF membership database provided complete data. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of the respondents rated PM as useful, or very useful. The main benefits of PM included: information on the disease and complaints, information about elements of peer support program, patient’s experience with useful positive case studies, relevant news on MD, and information of activity of the FMF. Of the 185 persons, 68 reported that they did not have a need for peer support as their disease was either in silent phase or did not cause any annoyance. The main reasons for nonuse were: mild disease, personal reasons, and problems in using. Regarding the benefits of iPS, 75% of recent and 64% of chronic MD patients said that they would benefit from such a program. The main benefits of iPS included: reliable information on the disease and its management, peer support useful for coping with the disease, information about managing MD symptoms, information about managing attitude, and information about therapy. Moreover, the study identified different groups of individuals, which included: nonusers of support from patient organizations, those who used the support but did not feel they benefited, and those who used and also benefited from such programs. CONCLUSION: The current study results provide some information about the preferences of MD patients regarding different forms of support and could certainly prove helpful while developing wider support strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5667786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56677862017-11-14 Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease Manchaiah, Vinaya Pyykkö, Ilmari Zou, Jing Levo, Hilla Kentala, Erna Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVES: To facilitate self-help, the Finnish Ménière’s Federation (FMF) provides various kinds of support to persons with Ménière’s disease (MD), which includes patient magazines (PM) and Internet-based peer support (iPS). The current study aimed to evaluate the benefits reported by MD patients in terms of PM and iPS. METHOD: The study used a cross-sectional survey design with a mixture of structured and open-ended questions administered online. A sample of 185 patients from the FMF membership database provided complete data. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of the respondents rated PM as useful, or very useful. The main benefits of PM included: information on the disease and complaints, information about elements of peer support program, patient’s experience with useful positive case studies, relevant news on MD, and information of activity of the FMF. Of the 185 persons, 68 reported that they did not have a need for peer support as their disease was either in silent phase or did not cause any annoyance. The main reasons for nonuse were: mild disease, personal reasons, and problems in using. Regarding the benefits of iPS, 75% of recent and 64% of chronic MD patients said that they would benefit from such a program. The main benefits of iPS included: reliable information on the disease and its management, peer support useful for coping with the disease, information about managing MD symptoms, information about managing attitude, and information about therapy. Moreover, the study identified different groups of individuals, which included: nonusers of support from patient organizations, those who used the support but did not feel they benefited, and those who used and also benefited from such programs. CONCLUSION: The current study results provide some information about the preferences of MD patients regarding different forms of support and could certainly prove helpful while developing wider support strategies. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5667786/ /pubmed/29138539 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S142257 Text en © 2017 Manchaiah et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Pyykkö, Ilmari
Zou, Jing
Levo, Hilla
Kentala, Erna
Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title_full Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title_fullStr Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title_short Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Ménière’s disease
title_sort patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and internet-based peer support in ménière’s disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138539
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S142257
work_keys_str_mv AT manchaiahvinaya patientreportedbenefitsfrompatientorganizationmagazinesandinternetbasedpeersupportinmenieresdisease
AT pyykkoilmari patientreportedbenefitsfrompatientorganizationmagazinesandinternetbasedpeersupportinmenieresdisease
AT zoujing patientreportedbenefitsfrompatientorganizationmagazinesandinternetbasedpeersupportinmenieresdisease
AT levohilla patientreportedbenefitsfrompatientorganizationmagazinesandinternetbasedpeersupportinmenieresdisease
AT kentalaerna patientreportedbenefitsfrompatientorganizationmagazinesandinternetbasedpeersupportinmenieresdisease