Cargando…
The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children presented with symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: The study design was cross sectional. The study retrospectively included all c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187081 |
_version_ | 1783275558200672256 |
---|---|
author | Ristic, Nina Milovanovic, Ivan Radusinovic, Milica Stevic, Marija Ristic, Milos Ristic, Maja Kisic Tepavcevic, Darija Alempijevic, Tamara |
author_facet | Ristic, Nina Milovanovic, Ivan Radusinovic, Milica Stevic, Marija Ristic, Milos Ristic, Maja Kisic Tepavcevic, Darija Alempijevic, Tamara |
author_sort | Ristic, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children presented with symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: The study design was cross sectional. The study retrospectively included all children who underwent combined multiple intraluminal impedance and pH (pH-MII) monitoring due to gastrointestinal and/or extraesophageal symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease at University Children's Hospital in Belgrade, from July 2012 to July 2016. RESULTS: A total of 218 (117 boys/101 girls), mean age 6.7 years (range 0.06–18.0 years), met the inclusion criteria. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was found in 128 of 218 children (57.4%) by pH-MII and in 76 (34.1%) children by pH metry alone. Using pH-MII monitoring as gold standard, sensitivity of pH-metry was lowest in infants (22.9%), with tendency to increase in older age groups (reaching 76.4% in children ≥ 9 years). The sensitivity of pH-metry alone in children with extraesophageal symptoms was 38.1%, while the sensitivity of pH-metry in children with gastrointestinal symptoms was 63.8%. Reflux esophagitis was identified in 31 (26.1%) of 119 children who underwent endoscopy. Logistic regression analysis showed that best predictors of endoscopic reflux esophagitis are the longest acid episode (OR = 1.52, p<0.05) and DeMeester reflux composite score (OR = 3.31, p<0.05). The significant cutoff values included DeMeester reflux composite score ≥ 29 (AUC 0.786, CI 0.695–0.877, p<0.01) and duration of longest acid reflux ≥ 18 minutes (AUC 0.784, CI 0.692–0.875, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that compared with pH-metry alone, pH-MII had significantly higher detection rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially in infants. Our findings also showed that pH-MII parameters correlated significantly with the endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5667817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56678172017-11-17 The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children Ristic, Nina Milovanovic, Ivan Radusinovic, Milica Stevic, Marija Ristic, Milos Ristic, Maja Kisic Tepavcevic, Darija Alempijevic, Tamara PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children presented with symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: The study design was cross sectional. The study retrospectively included all children who underwent combined multiple intraluminal impedance and pH (pH-MII) monitoring due to gastrointestinal and/or extraesophageal symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease at University Children's Hospital in Belgrade, from July 2012 to July 2016. RESULTS: A total of 218 (117 boys/101 girls), mean age 6.7 years (range 0.06–18.0 years), met the inclusion criteria. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was found in 128 of 218 children (57.4%) by pH-MII and in 76 (34.1%) children by pH metry alone. Using pH-MII monitoring as gold standard, sensitivity of pH-metry was lowest in infants (22.9%), with tendency to increase in older age groups (reaching 76.4% in children ≥ 9 years). The sensitivity of pH-metry alone in children with extraesophageal symptoms was 38.1%, while the sensitivity of pH-metry in children with gastrointestinal symptoms was 63.8%. Reflux esophagitis was identified in 31 (26.1%) of 119 children who underwent endoscopy. Logistic regression analysis showed that best predictors of endoscopic reflux esophagitis are the longest acid episode (OR = 1.52, p<0.05) and DeMeester reflux composite score (OR = 3.31, p<0.05). The significant cutoff values included DeMeester reflux composite score ≥ 29 (AUC 0.786, CI 0.695–0.877, p<0.01) and duration of longest acid reflux ≥ 18 minutes (AUC 0.784, CI 0.692–0.875, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that compared with pH-metry alone, pH-MII had significantly higher detection rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially in infants. Our findings also showed that pH-MII parameters correlated significantly with the endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis. Public Library of Science 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5667817/ /pubmed/29095882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187081 Text en © 2017 Ristic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ristic, Nina Milovanovic, Ivan Radusinovic, Milica Stevic, Marija Ristic, Milos Ristic, Maja Kisic Tepavcevic, Darija Alempijevic, Tamara The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title | The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title_full | The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title_fullStr | The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title_short | The comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
title_sort | comparative analyses of different diagnostic approaches in detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT risticnina thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT milovanovicivan thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT radusinovicmilica thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT stevicmarija thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT risticmilos thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT risticmaja thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT kisictepavcevicdarija thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT alempijevictamara thecomparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT risticnina comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT milovanovicivan comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT radusinovicmilica comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT stevicmarija comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT risticmilos comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT risticmaja comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT kisictepavcevicdarija comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren AT alempijevictamara comparativeanalysesofdifferentdiagnosticapproachesindetectionofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseinchildren |