Cargando…

Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies

The diversity and distribution of gelatinous zooplankton were investigated along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) from June to August 2004.Here, we present results from macrozooplankton trawl sampling, as well as comparisons made between five different methodologies that were employed during th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosia, Aino, Falkenhaug, Tone, Baxter, Emily J., Pagès, Francesc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187491
_version_ 1783275559862665216
author Hosia, Aino
Falkenhaug, Tone
Baxter, Emily J.
Pagès, Francesc
author_facet Hosia, Aino
Falkenhaug, Tone
Baxter, Emily J.
Pagès, Francesc
author_sort Hosia, Aino
collection PubMed
description The diversity and distribution of gelatinous zooplankton were investigated along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) from June to August 2004.Here, we present results from macrozooplankton trawl sampling, as well as comparisons made between five different methodologies that were employed during the MAR-ECO survey. In total, 16 species of hydromedusae, 31 species of siphonophores and four species of scyphozoans were identified to species level from macrozooplankton trawl samples. Additional taxa were identified to higher taxonomic levels and a single ctenophore genus was observed. Samples were collected at 17 stations along the MAR between the Azores and Iceland. A divergence in the species assemblages was observed at the southern limit of the Subpolar Frontal Zone. The catch composition of gelatinous zooplankton is compared between different sampling methodologies including: a macrozooplankton trawl; a Multinet; a ringnet attached to bottom trawl; and optical platforms (Underwater Video Profiler (UVP) & Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)). Different sampling methodologies are shown to exhibit selectivity towards different groups of gelatinous zooplankton. Only ~21% of taxa caught during the survey were caught by both the macrozooplankton trawl and the Multinet when deployed at the same station. The estimates of gelatinous zooplankton abundance calculated using these two gear types also varied widely (1.4 ± 0.9 individuals 1000 m(-3) estimated by the macrozooplankton trawl vs. 468.3 ± 315.4 individuals 1000 m(-3) estimated by the Multinet (mean ± s.d.) when used at the same stations (n = 6). While it appears that traditional net sampling can generate useful data on pelagic cnidarians, comparisons with results from the optical platforms suggest that ctenophore diversity and abundance are consistently underestimated, particularly when net sampling is conducted in combination with formalin fixation. The results emphasise the importance of considering sampling methodology both when planning surveys, as well as when interpreting existing data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5667825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56678252017-11-17 Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies Hosia, Aino Falkenhaug, Tone Baxter, Emily J. Pagès, Francesc PLoS One Research Article The diversity and distribution of gelatinous zooplankton were investigated along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) from June to August 2004.Here, we present results from macrozooplankton trawl sampling, as well as comparisons made between five different methodologies that were employed during the MAR-ECO survey. In total, 16 species of hydromedusae, 31 species of siphonophores and four species of scyphozoans were identified to species level from macrozooplankton trawl samples. Additional taxa were identified to higher taxonomic levels and a single ctenophore genus was observed. Samples were collected at 17 stations along the MAR between the Azores and Iceland. A divergence in the species assemblages was observed at the southern limit of the Subpolar Frontal Zone. The catch composition of gelatinous zooplankton is compared between different sampling methodologies including: a macrozooplankton trawl; a Multinet; a ringnet attached to bottom trawl; and optical platforms (Underwater Video Profiler (UVP) & Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)). Different sampling methodologies are shown to exhibit selectivity towards different groups of gelatinous zooplankton. Only ~21% of taxa caught during the survey were caught by both the macrozooplankton trawl and the Multinet when deployed at the same station. The estimates of gelatinous zooplankton abundance calculated using these two gear types also varied widely (1.4 ± 0.9 individuals 1000 m(-3) estimated by the macrozooplankton trawl vs. 468.3 ± 315.4 individuals 1000 m(-3) estimated by the Multinet (mean ± s.d.) when used at the same stations (n = 6). While it appears that traditional net sampling can generate useful data on pelagic cnidarians, comparisons with results from the optical platforms suggest that ctenophore diversity and abundance are consistently underestimated, particularly when net sampling is conducted in combination with formalin fixation. The results emphasise the importance of considering sampling methodology both when planning surveys, as well as when interpreting existing data. Public Library of Science 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5667825/ /pubmed/29095891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187491 Text en © 2017 Hosia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hosia, Aino
Falkenhaug, Tone
Baxter, Emily J.
Pagès, Francesc
Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title_full Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title_fullStr Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title_short Abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: A comparison of different sampling methodologies
title_sort abundance, distribution and diversity of gelatinous predators along the northern mid-atlantic ridge: a comparison of different sampling methodologies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187491
work_keys_str_mv AT hosiaaino abundancedistributionanddiversityofgelatinouspredatorsalongthenorthernmidatlanticridgeacomparisonofdifferentsamplingmethodologies
AT falkenhaugtone abundancedistributionanddiversityofgelatinouspredatorsalongthenorthernmidatlanticridgeacomparisonofdifferentsamplingmethodologies
AT baxteremilyj abundancedistributionanddiversityofgelatinouspredatorsalongthenorthernmidatlanticridgeacomparisonofdifferentsamplingmethodologies
AT pagesfrancesc abundancedistributionanddiversityofgelatinouspredatorsalongthenorthernmidatlanticridgeacomparisonofdifferentsamplingmethodologies