Cargando…
Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers
For the first time, the photoisomerization of a diarylethene moiety (DAET) in peptide conjugates was used to probe the effects of molecular rigidity/flexibility on the structure and behavior of model peptides bound to lipid membranes. The DAET unit was incorporated into the backbones of linear pepti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Pub. Co
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.09.021 |
_version_ | 1783275575543070720 |
---|---|
author | Babii, Oleg Afonin, Sergii Schober, Tim Komarov, Igor V. Ulrich, Anne S. |
author_facet | Babii, Oleg Afonin, Sergii Schober, Tim Komarov, Igor V. Ulrich, Anne S. |
author_sort | Babii, Oleg |
collection | PubMed |
description | For the first time, the photoisomerization of a diarylethene moiety (DAET) in peptide conjugates was used to probe the effects of molecular rigidity/flexibility on the structure and behavior of model peptides bound to lipid membranes. The DAET unit was incorporated into the backbones of linear peptide-based constructs, connecting two amphipathic sequences (derived from the β-stranded peptide (KIGAKI)(3) and/or the α-helical peptide BP100). A β-strand-DAET-α-helix and an α-helix-DAET-α-helix models were synthesized and studied in phospholipid membranes. Light-induced photoisomerization of the linker allowed the generation of two forms of each conjugate, which differed in the conformational mobility of the junction between the α-helical and/or the β-stranded part of these peptidomimetic molecules. A detailed study of their structural, orientational and conformational behavior, both in isotropic solution and in phospholipid model membranes, was carried out using circular dichroism and solid-state (19)F-NMR spectroscopy. The study showed that the rigid and flexible forms of the two conjugates had appreciably different structures only when embedded in an anisotropic lipid environment and only in the gel phase. The influence of the rigidity/flexibility of the studied conjugates on the lipid thermotropic phase transition was also investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. Both models were found to destabilize the lamellar gel phases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5667891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier Pub. Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56678912017-12-01 Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers Babii, Oleg Afonin, Sergii Schober, Tim Komarov, Igor V. Ulrich, Anne S. Biochim Biophys Acta Article For the first time, the photoisomerization of a diarylethene moiety (DAET) in peptide conjugates was used to probe the effects of molecular rigidity/flexibility on the structure and behavior of model peptides bound to lipid membranes. The DAET unit was incorporated into the backbones of linear peptide-based constructs, connecting two amphipathic sequences (derived from the β-stranded peptide (KIGAKI)(3) and/or the α-helical peptide BP100). A β-strand-DAET-α-helix and an α-helix-DAET-α-helix models were synthesized and studied in phospholipid membranes. Light-induced photoisomerization of the linker allowed the generation of two forms of each conjugate, which differed in the conformational mobility of the junction between the α-helical and/or the β-stranded part of these peptidomimetic molecules. A detailed study of their structural, orientational and conformational behavior, both in isotropic solution and in phospholipid model membranes, was carried out using circular dichroism and solid-state (19)F-NMR spectroscopy. The study showed that the rigid and flexible forms of the two conjugates had appreciably different structures only when embedded in an anisotropic lipid environment and only in the gel phase. The influence of the rigidity/flexibility of the studied conjugates on the lipid thermotropic phase transition was also investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. Both models were found to destabilize the lamellar gel phases. Elsevier Pub. Co 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5667891/ /pubmed/28958778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.09.021 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Babii, Oleg Afonin, Sergii Schober, Tim Komarov, Igor V. Ulrich, Anne S. Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title | Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title_full | Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title_fullStr | Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title_full_unstemmed | Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title_short | Flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
title_sort | flexibility vs rigidity of amphipathic peptide conjugates when interacting with lipid bilayers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.09.021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babiioleg flexibilityvsrigidityofamphipathicpeptideconjugateswheninteractingwithlipidbilayers AT afoninsergii flexibilityvsrigidityofamphipathicpeptideconjugateswheninteractingwithlipidbilayers AT schobertim flexibilityvsrigidityofamphipathicpeptideconjugateswheninteractingwithlipidbilayers AT komarovigorv flexibilityvsrigidityofamphipathicpeptideconjugateswheninteractingwithlipidbilayers AT ulrichannes flexibilityvsrigidityofamphipathicpeptideconjugateswheninteractingwithlipidbilayers |