Cargando…
Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer; few treatments exist for patients with advanced disease. Once tumors metastasize to distant sites, patients generally receive chemotherapy, but response duration and progression-free survival (PFS) are typically shor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108353 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19218 |
_version_ | 1783275612886007808 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Jürgen C. Lorenz, Eva Ugurel, Selma Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Pföhler, Claudia Kellner, Ivonne Meier, Friedegund Kähler, Katharina Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Haas, Gabriele Helwig, Christoph Oksen, Dina Schadendorf, Dirk Mahnke, Lisa Bharmal, Murtuza |
author_facet | Becker, Jürgen C. Lorenz, Eva Ugurel, Selma Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Pföhler, Claudia Kellner, Ivonne Meier, Friedegund Kähler, Katharina Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Haas, Gabriele Helwig, Christoph Oksen, Dina Schadendorf, Dirk Mahnke, Lisa Bharmal, Murtuza |
author_sort | Becker, Jürgen C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer; few treatments exist for patients with advanced disease. Once tumors metastasize to distant sites, patients generally receive chemotherapy, but response duration and progression-free survival (PFS) are typically short. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. Here, we studied outcomes in patients who received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in an MCC-specific registry diagnosed with stage IV MCC between November 1, 2004, and September 15, 2015, and treated with second-line or later chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. Patient records, including baseline characteristics, immunocompetent status, and responses to prior chemotherapy, were evaluated. Patients meeting eligibility criteria were followed through December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Of 29 patients with metastatic MCC and immunocompetent status who had received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy, 3 achieved a partial response, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 10.3% (95% CI, 2.2–27.4). In the overall population including patients with immunocompetent and immunocompromised status (n = 34), the ORR was 8.8% (95% CI, 1.9–23.7). The median duration of response was 1.9 months (range, 1.3–2.1 months; 95% CI, 1.3–2.1). In the immunocompetent population, median PFS and overall survival were 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.5–6.0) and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.3–6.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low response rates and limited durability confirm previous reports of the ineffectiveness of second-line or later chemotherapy in patients with metastatic MCC and provide a benchmark for assessing clinical benefit of new treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5668086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56680862017-11-04 Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe Becker, Jürgen C. Lorenz, Eva Ugurel, Selma Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Pföhler, Claudia Kellner, Ivonne Meier, Friedegund Kähler, Katharina Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Haas, Gabriele Helwig, Christoph Oksen, Dina Schadendorf, Dirk Mahnke, Lisa Bharmal, Murtuza Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer; few treatments exist for patients with advanced disease. Once tumors metastasize to distant sites, patients generally receive chemotherapy, but response duration and progression-free survival (PFS) are typically short. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. Here, we studied outcomes in patients who received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy for metastatic MCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in an MCC-specific registry diagnosed with stage IV MCC between November 1, 2004, and September 15, 2015, and treated with second-line or later chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. Patient records, including baseline characteristics, immunocompetent status, and responses to prior chemotherapy, were evaluated. Patients meeting eligibility criteria were followed through December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Of 29 patients with metastatic MCC and immunocompetent status who had received ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy, 3 achieved a partial response, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 10.3% (95% CI, 2.2–27.4). In the overall population including patients with immunocompetent and immunocompromised status (n = 34), the ORR was 8.8% (95% CI, 1.9–23.7). The median duration of response was 1.9 months (range, 1.3–2.1 months; 95% CI, 1.3–2.1). In the immunocompetent population, median PFS and overall survival were 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.5–6.0) and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.3–6.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low response rates and limited durability confirm previous reports of the ineffectiveness of second-line or later chemotherapy in patients with metastatic MCC and provide a benchmark for assessing clinical benefit of new treatments. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5668086/ /pubmed/29108353 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19218 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Becker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Becker, Jürgen C. Lorenz, Eva Ugurel, Selma Eigentler, Thomas K. Kiecker, Felix Pföhler, Claudia Kellner, Ivonne Meier, Friedegund Kähler, Katharina Mohr, Peter Berking, Carola Haas, Gabriele Helwig, Christoph Oksen, Dina Schadendorf, Dirk Mahnke, Lisa Bharmal, Murtuza Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title | Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title_full | Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title_short | Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe |
title_sort | evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in europe |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108353 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckerjurgenc evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT lorenzeva evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT ugurelselma evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT eigentlerthomask evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT kieckerfelix evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT pfohlerclaudia evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT kellnerivonne evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT meierfriedegund evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT kahlerkatharina evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT mohrpeter evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT berkingcarola evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT haasgabriele evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT helwigchristoph evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT oksendina evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT schadendorfdirk evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT mahnkelisa evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope AT bharmalmurtuza evaluationofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesinpatientswithdistantmetastaticmerkelcellcarcinomafollowingsecondlinechemotherapyineurope |