Cargando…
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108385 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852 |
_version_ | 1783275620474552320 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Jian-Xian Lin, Ju-Li Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Huang, Chang-Ming |
author_facet | Lin, Jian-Xian Lin, Ju-Li Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Huang, Chang-Ming |
author_sort | Lin, Jian-Xian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor location, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage and pTNM stage significantly differed between the LATG group and OTG group. After the propensity score matching, the clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.05) were better in the LATG group than the OTG group. Morbidity and mortality were lower in the LATG group than the OTG group (P < 0.05) for pre-matched patients. However, significant intergroup differences in morbidity were not identified after propensity matching. Although overall survival did not significantly differ between groups for the pre-matched patients, the 3-year cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the LATG group (89.9%) than the OTG group (97.7%) for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.028). After propensity score matching, the analysis of the cumulative survival curve did not show a significant difference for any cancer stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 1096 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the covariates between the LATG group and the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. Operative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of LATG for gastric cancer is a safe, reliable and minimally invasive procedure with long-term outcomes similar to those of OTG. Further randomized controlled clinical trials can be conducted to provide valuable evidence of the safety and efficacy of LATG in treating gastric cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5668118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56681182017-11-04 Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Lin, Jian-Xian Lin, Ju-Li Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Huang, Chang-Ming Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor location, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage and pTNM stage significantly differed between the LATG group and OTG group. After the propensity score matching, the clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.05) were better in the LATG group than the OTG group. Morbidity and mortality were lower in the LATG group than the OTG group (P < 0.05) for pre-matched patients. However, significant intergroup differences in morbidity were not identified after propensity matching. Although overall survival did not significantly differ between groups for the pre-matched patients, the 3-year cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the LATG group (89.9%) than the OTG group (97.7%) for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.028). After propensity score matching, the analysis of the cumulative survival curve did not show a significant difference for any cancer stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 1096 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the covariates between the LATG group and the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. Operative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of LATG for gastric cancer is a safe, reliable and minimally invasive procedure with long-term outcomes similar to those of OTG. Further randomized controlled clinical trials can be conducted to provide valuable evidence of the safety and efficacy of LATG in treating gastric cancer. Impact Journals LLC 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5668118/ /pubmed/29108385 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Lin, Jian-Xian Lin, Ju-Li Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Huang, Chang-Ming Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108385 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linjianxian shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT linjuli shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT zhengchaohui shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT liping shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT xiejianwei shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT wangjiabin shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT lujun shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT chenqiyue shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT caolonglong shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT linmi shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT turuhong shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT huangzening shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT huangchangming shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis |