Cargando…

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Jian-Xian, Lin, Ju-Li, Zheng, Chao-Hui, Li, Ping, Xie, Jian-Wei, Wang, Jia-Bin, Lu, Jun, Chen, Qi-Yue, Cao, Long-Long, Lin, Mi, Tu, Ru-Hong, Huang, Ze-Ning, Huang, Chang-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108385
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852
_version_ 1783275620474552320
author Lin, Jian-Xian
Lin, Ju-Li
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Huang, Chang-Ming
author_facet Lin, Jian-Xian
Lin, Ju-Li
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Huang, Chang-Ming
author_sort Lin, Jian-Xian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor location, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage and pTNM stage significantly differed between the LATG group and OTG group. After the propensity score matching, the clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.05) were better in the LATG group than the OTG group. Morbidity and mortality were lower in the LATG group than the OTG group (P < 0.05) for pre-matched patients. However, significant intergroup differences in morbidity were not identified after propensity matching. Although overall survival did not significantly differ between groups for the pre-matched patients, the 3-year cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the LATG group (89.9%) than the OTG group (97.7%) for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.028). After propensity score matching, the analysis of the cumulative survival curve did not show a significant difference for any cancer stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 1096 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the covariates between the LATG group and the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. Operative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of LATG for gastric cancer is a safe, reliable and minimally invasive procedure with long-term outcomes similar to those of OTG. Further randomized controlled clinical trials can be conducted to provide valuable evidence of the safety and efficacy of LATG in treating gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5668118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56681182017-11-04 Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Lin, Jian-Xian Lin, Ju-Li Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Huang, Chang-Ming Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: Among all patients, age, tumor location, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage and pTNM stage significantly differed between the LATG group and OTG group. After the propensity score matching, the clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.05) were better in the LATG group than the OTG group. Morbidity and mortality were lower in the LATG group than the OTG group (P < 0.05) for pre-matched patients. However, significant intergroup differences in morbidity were not identified after propensity matching. Although overall survival did not significantly differ between groups for the pre-matched patients, the 3-year cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the LATG group (89.9%) than the OTG group (97.7%) for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.028). After propensity score matching, the analysis of the cumulative survival curve did not show a significant difference for any cancer stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 1096 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the covariates between the LATG group and the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. Operative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of LATG for gastric cancer is a safe, reliable and minimally invasive procedure with long-term outcomes similar to those of OTG. Further randomized controlled clinical trials can be conducted to provide valuable evidence of the safety and efficacy of LATG in treating gastric cancer. Impact Journals LLC 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5668118/ /pubmed/29108385 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lin, Ju-Li
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Huang, Chang-Ming
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5668118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29108385
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16852
work_keys_str_mv AT linjianxian shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT linjuli shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhengchaohui shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT liping shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT xiejianwei shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wangjiabin shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lujun shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT chenqiyue shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT caolonglong shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT linmi shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT turuhong shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT huangzening shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT huangchangming shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopyassistedversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis