Cargando…

Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)

BACKGROUND: International benchmarking can help identify trauma system performance issues and determine the extent to which other countries also experience these. When problems are identified, countries can look to high performers for insight into possible responses. The objective of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali Ali, B., Lefering, R., Fortun Moral, M., Belzunegui Otano, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0453-2
_version_ 1783275781012586496
author Ali Ali, B.
Lefering, R.
Fortun Moral, M.
Belzunegui Otano, T.
author_facet Ali Ali, B.
Lefering, R.
Fortun Moral, M.
Belzunegui Otano, T.
author_sort Ali Ali, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: International benchmarking can help identify trauma system performance issues and determine the extent to which other countries also experience these. When problems are identified, countries can look to high performers for insight into possible responses. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment and outcome of severely injured patients in Germany and Navarra, Spain. METHODS: Data collected, from 2010 to 2013, in the Navarra Major Trauma Registry (NMTR) and the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) were compared. Both registries followed the Utstein Trauma Template (European Core Dataset) for documentation of trauma patients. Adult patients (≥ 16 years) with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) being >15 points were included in this study. Patients who had been admitted to the hospital later than 24 h after the trauma, had been pronounced dead before hospital arrival, or had been injured by hanging, drowning or burns, were excluded. Demographic data, injury data, prehospital data, hospital treatment data, time intervals, and outcome were compared. The expected mortality was calculated using the Revised Injury Severity Classification score II (RISC II). RESULTS: A total of 646 and 43,110 patients were included in the outcome analysis from NMTR and TR-DGU, respectively. The difference between observed and expected mortality was −0.4% (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–1.04) in Germany and 1.6% (SMR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02–1.14) in Navarra. Differences in the characteristics of trauma patients and trauma systems between the regions were noted. CONCLUSION: The higher observed mortality in Navarra is consistent with the epidemiological characteristics of its population. However, to improve the quality of trauma care in the Navarra trauma system, certain improvements are necessary. There were less young adults with severe injuries in Navarra than in Germany. It is possible to compare data of severely injured patients from different countries if standardized registries are used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5669022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56690222017-11-15 Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®) Ali Ali, B. Lefering, R. Fortun Moral, M. Belzunegui Otano, T. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: International benchmarking can help identify trauma system performance issues and determine the extent to which other countries also experience these. When problems are identified, countries can look to high performers for insight into possible responses. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment and outcome of severely injured patients in Germany and Navarra, Spain. METHODS: Data collected, from 2010 to 2013, in the Navarra Major Trauma Registry (NMTR) and the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) were compared. Both registries followed the Utstein Trauma Template (European Core Dataset) for documentation of trauma patients. Adult patients (≥ 16 years) with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) being >15 points were included in this study. Patients who had been admitted to the hospital later than 24 h after the trauma, had been pronounced dead before hospital arrival, or had been injured by hanging, drowning or burns, were excluded. Demographic data, injury data, prehospital data, hospital treatment data, time intervals, and outcome were compared. The expected mortality was calculated using the Revised Injury Severity Classification score II (RISC II). RESULTS: A total of 646 and 43,110 patients were included in the outcome analysis from NMTR and TR-DGU, respectively. The difference between observed and expected mortality was −0.4% (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–1.04) in Germany and 1.6% (SMR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02–1.14) in Navarra. Differences in the characteristics of trauma patients and trauma systems between the regions were noted. CONCLUSION: The higher observed mortality in Navarra is consistent with the epidemiological characteristics of its population. However, to improve the quality of trauma care in the Navarra trauma system, certain improvements are necessary. There were less young adults with severe injuries in Navarra than in Germany. It is possible to compare data of severely injured patients from different countries if standardized registries are used. BioMed Central 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5669022/ /pubmed/29096679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0453-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ali Ali, B.
Lefering, R.
Fortun Moral, M.
Belzunegui Otano, T.
Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title_full Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title_fullStr Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title_short Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®)
title_sort epidemiological comparison between the navarra major trauma registry and the german trauma registry (tr-dgu®)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0453-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alialib epidemiologicalcomparisonbetweenthenavarramajortraumaregistryandthegermantraumaregistrytrdgu
AT leferingr epidemiologicalcomparisonbetweenthenavarramajortraumaregistryandthegermantraumaregistrytrdgu
AT fortunmoralm epidemiologicalcomparisonbetweenthenavarramajortraumaregistryandthegermantraumaregistrytrdgu
AT belzuneguiotanot epidemiologicalcomparisonbetweenthenavarramajortraumaregistryandthegermantraumaregistrytrdgu