Cargando…

Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging

BACKGROUND: The assessment of myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion (WM) using contrast dipyridamole echocardiography (cSE‐WMP) improves the sensitivity to detect coronary artery disease and the stratification of cardiac events, but its long‐term value for fatal and nonfatal ischemic cardiac eve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaibazzi, Nicola, Porter, Thomas, Lorenzoni, Valentina, Pontone, Gianluca, De Santis, Delia, De Rosa, Andrea, Guaricci, Andrea Igoren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006202
_version_ 1783275815206649856
author Gaibazzi, Nicola
Porter, Thomas
Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pontone, Gianluca
De Santis, Delia
De Rosa, Andrea
Guaricci, Andrea Igoren
author_facet Gaibazzi, Nicola
Porter, Thomas
Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pontone, Gianluca
De Santis, Delia
De Rosa, Andrea
Guaricci, Andrea Igoren
author_sort Gaibazzi, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion (WM) using contrast dipyridamole echocardiography (cSE‐WMP) improves the sensitivity to detect coronary artery disease and the stratification of cardiac events, but its long‐term value for fatal and nonfatal ischemic cardiac events, also with respect to patients undergoing revascularization or not, remains to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: One‐thousand three‐hundred and twenty‐nine patients with suspect or known CAD who underwent cSE‐WMP were followed for a median 5.5 years. The independent prognostic value of cSE‐WMP regarding cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was related to stress WM and MP, rest ejection fraction, clinical risk factors, and medications. Patients revascularized after cSE‐WMP were separately analyzed to determine whether the procedure influenced outcome and whether this depends on cSE‐WMP results. A total of 125 cardiac fatal and nonfatal ischemic events (9.4%) occurred during the follow‐up (61 deaths, 64 myocardial infarctions). The 5‐year event rate with normal MP and WM was 5.9%, 9.9% with isolated MP defects (normal WM), and 15.5% with both MP and WM abnormalities. In patients not undergoing revascularization (n=1111), reversible MP defects added discrimination value over WM response and clinical factors/medication data (P=0.001), while in the cohort undergoing revascularization (n=218), cSE‐WMP results did not influence outcome. CONCLUSIONS: cSE‐WMP, with both contrast MP and WM assessments, provides independent, incremental prognostic information regarding ischemic cardiac events at 5 years in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Revascularization reduces cardiac events after an abnormal cSE‐WMP, resulting in outcomes not different from those in patients with normal cSE‐WMP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5669203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56692032017-11-09 Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging Gaibazzi, Nicola Porter, Thomas Lorenzoni, Valentina Pontone, Gianluca De Santis, Delia De Rosa, Andrea Guaricci, Andrea Igoren J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The assessment of myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion (WM) using contrast dipyridamole echocardiography (cSE‐WMP) improves the sensitivity to detect coronary artery disease and the stratification of cardiac events, but its long‐term value for fatal and nonfatal ischemic cardiac events, also with respect to patients undergoing revascularization or not, remains to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: One‐thousand three‐hundred and twenty‐nine patients with suspect or known CAD who underwent cSE‐WMP were followed for a median 5.5 years. The independent prognostic value of cSE‐WMP regarding cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was related to stress WM and MP, rest ejection fraction, clinical risk factors, and medications. Patients revascularized after cSE‐WMP were separately analyzed to determine whether the procedure influenced outcome and whether this depends on cSE‐WMP results. A total of 125 cardiac fatal and nonfatal ischemic events (9.4%) occurred during the follow‐up (61 deaths, 64 myocardial infarctions). The 5‐year event rate with normal MP and WM was 5.9%, 9.9% with isolated MP defects (normal WM), and 15.5% with both MP and WM abnormalities. In patients not undergoing revascularization (n=1111), reversible MP defects added discrimination value over WM response and clinical factors/medication data (P=0.001), while in the cohort undergoing revascularization (n=218), cSE‐WMP results did not influence outcome. CONCLUSIONS: cSE‐WMP, with both contrast MP and WM assessments, provides independent, incremental prognostic information regarding ischemic cardiac events at 5 years in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Revascularization reduces cardiac events after an abnormal cSE‐WMP, resulting in outcomes not different from those in patients with normal cSE‐WMP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5669203/ /pubmed/28566297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006202 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gaibazzi, Nicola
Porter, Thomas
Lorenzoni, Valentina
Pontone, Gianluca
De Santis, Delia
De Rosa, Andrea
Guaricci, Andrea Igoren
Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title_full Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title_fullStr Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title_short Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging
title_sort effect of coronary revascularization on the prognostic value of stress myocardial contrast wall motion and perfusion imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006202
work_keys_str_mv AT gaibazzinicola effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT porterthomas effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT lorenzonivalentina effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT pontonegianluca effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT desantisdelia effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT derosaandrea effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging
AT guaricciandreaigoren effectofcoronaryrevascularizationontheprognosticvalueofstressmyocardialcontrastwallmotionandperfusionimaging