Cargando…
Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for mid-shaft clavicular fracture. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of non-operative treatment, plate fixation, and intramedullary pin fixation in terms of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) for treatment of mid-shaft clavicular fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137339 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18456 |
_version_ | 1783275940906795008 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Wei Wang, Hua Li, Yu-Sheng Zhou, Tian-Jian Hu, Xin-Jia |
author_facet | Jiang, Wei Wang, Hua Li, Yu-Sheng Zhou, Tian-Jian Hu, Xin-Jia |
author_sort | Jiang, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for mid-shaft clavicular fracture. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of non-operative treatment, plate fixation, and intramedullary pin fixation in terms of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) for treatment of mid-shaft clavicular fracture. Comprehensive search of the Embase, Cochrane Library and PubMed was conducted to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effect network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) in OpenBUGS 3.2.2. Differences in CMS among the three treatments analyzed were evaluated with weighted mean difference (WMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in our network meta-analysis. Our results revealed that in terms of CMS followed-up for six months, the efficacies of plate fixation and intramedullary pin fixation were higher than non-operative treatment (plate fixation: WMD = 4.70, 95% CI = 1.21 ∼ 7.83; intramedullary pin fixation: WMD = 6.71, 95% CI = 3.20 ∼ 10.39), and intramedullary pin fixation had better efficacy than plate fixation, had better efficacy. However, no differences were found between the efficacies of the three treatments in pairwise comparisons with respect to CMS followed-up for six weeks, three months, 12 months and 24 months. In addition, the cluster analysis showed that intramedullary pin fixation had the best efficacy for patients with mid-shaft CF, followed by plate fixation and non-operative treatment. These analyses suggest intramedullary pin fixation may be the optimal therapeutic approach for mid-shaft clavicular fracture patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5669965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56699652017-11-09 Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments Jiang, Wei Wang, Hua Li, Yu-Sheng Zhou, Tian-Jian Hu, Xin-Jia Oncotarget Meta-Analysis There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for mid-shaft clavicular fracture. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of non-operative treatment, plate fixation, and intramedullary pin fixation in terms of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) for treatment of mid-shaft clavicular fracture. Comprehensive search of the Embase, Cochrane Library and PubMed was conducted to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effect network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) in OpenBUGS 3.2.2. Differences in CMS among the three treatments analyzed were evaluated with weighted mean difference (WMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in our network meta-analysis. Our results revealed that in terms of CMS followed-up for six months, the efficacies of plate fixation and intramedullary pin fixation were higher than non-operative treatment (plate fixation: WMD = 4.70, 95% CI = 1.21 ∼ 7.83; intramedullary pin fixation: WMD = 6.71, 95% CI = 3.20 ∼ 10.39), and intramedullary pin fixation had better efficacy than plate fixation, had better efficacy. However, no differences were found between the efficacies of the three treatments in pairwise comparisons with respect to CMS followed-up for six weeks, three months, 12 months and 24 months. In addition, the cluster analysis showed that intramedullary pin fixation had the best efficacy for patients with mid-shaft CF, followed by plate fixation and non-operative treatment. These analyses suggest intramedullary pin fixation may be the optimal therapeutic approach for mid-shaft clavicular fracture patients. Impact Journals LLC 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5669965/ /pubmed/29137339 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18456 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Jiang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Jiang, Wei Wang, Hua Li, Yu-Sheng Zhou, Tian-Jian Hu, Xin-Jia Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title | Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title_full | Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title_short | Meta-analysis of differences in Constant-Murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
title_sort | meta-analysis of differences in constant-murley scores for three mid-shaft clavicular fracture treatments |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137339 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangwei metaanalysisofdifferencesinconstantmurleyscoresforthreemidshaftclavicularfracturetreatments AT wanghua metaanalysisofdifferencesinconstantmurleyscoresforthreemidshaftclavicularfracturetreatments AT liyusheng metaanalysisofdifferencesinconstantmurleyscoresforthreemidshaftclavicularfracturetreatments AT zhoutianjian metaanalysisofdifferencesinconstantmurleyscoresforthreemidshaftclavicularfracturetreatments AT huxinjia metaanalysisofdifferencesinconstantmurleyscoresforthreemidshaftclavicularfracturetreatments |