Cargando…
Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) is an adverse event associated with these drugs. The contribution of BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors to cuSCC are still unknown...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21059 |
_version_ | 1783275941606195200 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Ling Wang, Yina Hong, Yun Ye, Xianghua Shi, Peng Zhang, Junyan Zhao, Qiong |
author_facet | Peng, Ling Wang, Yina Hong, Yun Ye, Xianghua Shi, Peng Zhang, Junyan Zhao, Qiong |
author_sort | Peng, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) is an adverse event associated with these drugs. The contribution of BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors to cuSCC are still unknown. We performed this meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence and relative risk of cuSCC in cancer patients treated with these drugs. RESULTS: A total of 7,442 patients from 24 primary studies were included. The incidences of all-grade and high-grade cuSCC in cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitor were 12.5% (95% CI: 10.8–14.6%) and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.8–13.8%), and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors were 3.0% (95% CI: 2.0–4.5%) and 2.8% (95% CI: 1.9–4.0%), respectively. On subgroup analysis and meta-regression, the incidence of cuSCC did not vary with tumor type, study design and specific drug used. The use of single agent BRAF inhibitor significantly increased the risk of developing cuSCC comparing with dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors for all-grade (RR 4.72, 95% CI: 2.42–9.20) and high-grade (RR 4.92, 95% CI: 2.64–9.16) in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase and abstracts published in ASCO proceedings were searched for relevant studies from January 2000 to June 2017. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF inhibitor significantly increases the risk of developing cuSCC compared with dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients. Clinicians should be aware of the risks of cuSCC with the administration of these drugs in cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5669968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56699682017-11-09 Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis Peng, Ling Wang, Yina Hong, Yun Ye, Xianghua Shi, Peng Zhang, Junyan Zhao, Qiong Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) is an adverse event associated with these drugs. The contribution of BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors to cuSCC are still unknown. We performed this meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence and relative risk of cuSCC in cancer patients treated with these drugs. RESULTS: A total of 7,442 patients from 24 primary studies were included. The incidences of all-grade and high-grade cuSCC in cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitor were 12.5% (95% CI: 10.8–14.6%) and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.8–13.8%), and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors were 3.0% (95% CI: 2.0–4.5%) and 2.8% (95% CI: 1.9–4.0%), respectively. On subgroup analysis and meta-regression, the incidence of cuSCC did not vary with tumor type, study design and specific drug used. The use of single agent BRAF inhibitor significantly increased the risk of developing cuSCC comparing with dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors for all-grade (RR 4.72, 95% CI: 2.42–9.20) and high-grade (RR 4.92, 95% CI: 2.64–9.16) in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase and abstracts published in ASCO proceedings were searched for relevant studies from January 2000 to June 2017. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF inhibitor significantly increases the risk of developing cuSCC compared with dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients. Clinicians should be aware of the risks of cuSCC with the administration of these drugs in cancer patients. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5669968/ /pubmed/29137342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21059 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Peng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Peng, Ling Wang, Yina Hong, Yun Ye, Xianghua Shi, Peng Zhang, Junyan Zhao, Qiong Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title | Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent BRAF inhibitor and dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | incidence and relative risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with single-agent braf inhibitor and dual braf/mek inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137342 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengling incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT wangyina incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT hongyun incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT yexianghua incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT shipeng incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT zhangjunyan incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis AT zhaoqiong incidenceandrelativeriskofcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomawithsingleagentbrafinhibitoranddualbrafmekinhibitorsincancerpatientsametaanalysis |