Cargando…
Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is a widely adopted strategy to monitor men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Current AS inclusion criteria may misclassify as many as one in four patients. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and novel PCa biomarkers ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00256 |
_version_ | 1783275952543891456 |
---|---|
author | Glaser, Zachary A. Gordetsky, Jennifer B. Porter, Kristin K. Varambally, Sooryanarayana Rais-Bahrami, Soroush |
author_facet | Glaser, Zachary A. Gordetsky, Jennifer B. Porter, Kristin K. Varambally, Sooryanarayana Rais-Bahrami, Soroush |
author_sort | Glaser, Zachary A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is a widely adopted strategy to monitor men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Current AS inclusion criteria may misclassify as many as one in four patients. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and novel PCa biomarkers may offer improved risk stratification. We performed a review of recently published literature to characterize emerging evidence in support of these novel modalities. METHODS: An English literature search was conducted on PubMed for available original investigations on localized PCa, AS, imaging, and biomarkers published within the past 3 years. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, biomarker, genetic, genomic, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. The bibliographies and diagnostic modalities of the identified studies were used to expand our search. RESULTS: Our review identified 222 original studies. Our expanded search yielded 244 studies. Among these, 70 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI offers improved detection of clinically significant PCa, and MRI-fusion technology enhances the sensitivity of surveillance biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the promise of commercially available screening assays for prediction of AS failure, and several novel biomarkers show promise in this setting. CONCLUSION: In the era of AS for men with low-risk PCa, improved strategies for proper stratification are needed. mpMRI has dramatically enhanced the detection of clinically significant PCa. The advent of novel biomarkers for prediction of aggressive disease and AS failure has shown some initial promise, but further validation is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5670116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56701162017-11-21 Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance Glaser, Zachary A. Gordetsky, Jennifer B. Porter, Kristin K. Varambally, Sooryanarayana Rais-Bahrami, Soroush Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is a widely adopted strategy to monitor men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Current AS inclusion criteria may misclassify as many as one in four patients. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and novel PCa biomarkers may offer improved risk stratification. We performed a review of recently published literature to characterize emerging evidence in support of these novel modalities. METHODS: An English literature search was conducted on PubMed for available original investigations on localized PCa, AS, imaging, and biomarkers published within the past 3 years. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, biomarker, genetic, genomic, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. The bibliographies and diagnostic modalities of the identified studies were used to expand our search. RESULTS: Our review identified 222 original studies. Our expanded search yielded 244 studies. Among these, 70 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI offers improved detection of clinically significant PCa, and MRI-fusion technology enhances the sensitivity of surveillance biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the promise of commercially available screening assays for prediction of AS failure, and several novel biomarkers show promise in this setting. CONCLUSION: In the era of AS for men with low-risk PCa, improved strategies for proper stratification are needed. mpMRI has dramatically enhanced the detection of clinically significant PCa. The advent of novel biomarkers for prediction of aggressive disease and AS failure has shown some initial promise, but further validation is warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5670116/ /pubmed/29164056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00256 Text en Copyright © 2017 Glaser, Gordetsky, Porter, Varambally and Rais-Bahrami. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Glaser, Zachary A. Gordetsky, Jennifer B. Porter, Kristin K. Varambally, Sooryanarayana Rais-Bahrami, Soroush Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title | Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title_full | Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title_fullStr | Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title_short | Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance |
title_sort | prostate cancer imaging and biomarkers guiding safe selection of active surveillance |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glaserzacharya prostatecancerimagingandbiomarkersguidingsafeselectionofactivesurveillance AT gordetskyjenniferb prostatecancerimagingandbiomarkersguidingsafeselectionofactivesurveillance AT porterkristink prostatecancerimagingandbiomarkersguidingsafeselectionofactivesurveillance AT varamballysooryanarayana prostatecancerimagingandbiomarkersguidingsafeselectionofactivesurveillance AT raisbahramisoroush prostatecancerimagingandbiomarkersguidingsafeselectionofactivesurveillance |