Cargando…

Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests

Objective: To compare peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) and the test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between a 1-min and a 3-min closed-end and an incremental open-end upper-body poling test. Methods: On two separate test days, 24 healthy, upper-body trained men (age: 28.3 ± 9.3 years, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgart, Julia K., Skovereng, Knut, Sandbakk, Øyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00857
_version_ 1783275959122657280
author Baumgart, Julia K.
Skovereng, Knut
Sandbakk, Øyvind
author_facet Baumgart, Julia K.
Skovereng, Knut
Sandbakk, Øyvind
author_sort Baumgart, Julia K.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) and the test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between a 1-min and a 3-min closed-end and an incremental open-end upper-body poling test. Methods: On two separate test days, 24 healthy, upper-body trained men (age: 28.3 ± 9.3 years, body mass: 77.4 ± 8.9 kg, height: 182 ± 7 cm) performed a 1-min, a 3-min and an incremental test to volitional exhaustion in the same random order. Respiratory parameters, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and power output were measured. VO(2peak) was determined as the single highest 30-s average. Relative reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC(2, 1)) and absolute reliability with the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results: The incremental (3.50 ± 0.46 L·min(−1) and 45.4 ± 5.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the 3-min test (3.42 ± 0.47 L·min(−1) and 44.5 ± 5.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) resulted in significantly higher absolute and body-mass normalized VO(2peak) compared to the 1-min test (3.13 ± 0.40 L·min(−1) and 40.4 ± 5.0 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) (all comparisons, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the incremental test resulted in a significantly higher VO(2peak) as compared to the 3-min test (p < 0.001). VO(2peak) was significantly higher on day 1 than day 2 for the 1-min test (p < 0.05) and displayed a trend toward higher values on day 2 for the incremental test (p = 0.07). High and very high ICCs across all physiological parameters were found for the 1-min (0.827–0.956), the 3-min (0.916–0.949), and the incremental test (0.728–0.956). The SDC was consistently small for HR (1-min: 4%, 3-min: 4%, incremental: 3%), moderate for absolute and body-mass normalized VO(2peak) (1-min: 5%, 3-min: 6%, incremental: 7%) and large for BLa (1-min: 20%, 3-min: 12%, incremental: 22%). Conclusions: Whereas both the 3-min and the incremental test display high relative reliability, the incremental test induces slightly higher VO(2peak). However, the 3-min test seems to be more stable with respect to day-to-day differences in VO(2peak). The 1-min test would provide a reliable alternative when short test-duration is desirable, but is not recommended for testing VO(2peak) due to the clearly lower values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5670144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56701442017-11-21 Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests Baumgart, Julia K. Skovereng, Knut Sandbakk, Øyvind Front Physiol Physiology Objective: To compare peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) and the test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between a 1-min and a 3-min closed-end and an incremental open-end upper-body poling test. Methods: On two separate test days, 24 healthy, upper-body trained men (age: 28.3 ± 9.3 years, body mass: 77.4 ± 8.9 kg, height: 182 ± 7 cm) performed a 1-min, a 3-min and an incremental test to volitional exhaustion in the same random order. Respiratory parameters, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and power output were measured. VO(2peak) was determined as the single highest 30-s average. Relative reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC(2, 1)) and absolute reliability with the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results: The incremental (3.50 ± 0.46 L·min(−1) and 45.4 ± 5.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the 3-min test (3.42 ± 0.47 L·min(−1) and 44.5 ± 5.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) resulted in significantly higher absolute and body-mass normalized VO(2peak) compared to the 1-min test (3.13 ± 0.40 L·min(−1) and 40.4 ± 5.0 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) (all comparisons, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the incremental test resulted in a significantly higher VO(2peak) as compared to the 3-min test (p < 0.001). VO(2peak) was significantly higher on day 1 than day 2 for the 1-min test (p < 0.05) and displayed a trend toward higher values on day 2 for the incremental test (p = 0.07). High and very high ICCs across all physiological parameters were found for the 1-min (0.827–0.956), the 3-min (0.916–0.949), and the incremental test (0.728–0.956). The SDC was consistently small for HR (1-min: 4%, 3-min: 4%, incremental: 3%), moderate for absolute and body-mass normalized VO(2peak) (1-min: 5%, 3-min: 6%, incremental: 7%) and large for BLa (1-min: 20%, 3-min: 12%, incremental: 22%). Conclusions: Whereas both the 3-min and the incremental test display high relative reliability, the incremental test induces slightly higher VO(2peak). However, the 3-min test seems to be more stable with respect to day-to-day differences in VO(2peak). The 1-min test would provide a reliable alternative when short test-duration is desirable, but is not recommended for testing VO(2peak) due to the clearly lower values. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5670144/ /pubmed/29163202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00857 Text en Copyright © 2017 Baumgart, Skovereng and Sandbakk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Baumgart, Julia K.
Skovereng, Knut
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title_full Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title_fullStr Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title_short Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Test-Retest Reliability of Physiological Parameters between Closed-End and Incremental Upper-Body Poling Tests
title_sort comparison of peak oxygen uptake and test-retest reliability of physiological parameters between closed-end and incremental upper-body poling tests
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00857
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgartjuliak comparisonofpeakoxygenuptakeandtestretestreliabilityofphysiologicalparametersbetweenclosedendandincrementalupperbodypolingtests
AT skoverengknut comparisonofpeakoxygenuptakeandtestretestreliabilityofphysiologicalparametersbetweenclosedendandincrementalupperbodypolingtests
AT sandbakkøyvind comparisonofpeakoxygenuptakeandtestretestreliabilityofphysiologicalparametersbetweenclosedendandincrementalupperbodypolingtests