Cargando…

A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) are third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) composed of biodegradable polymers that may improve prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After five years of follow-up, BP-BES showed conflicting results compared to durable pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Pan, Lu, Shuai, Li, Yuanyuan, Deng, Mengmeng, Wang, Zhaohui, Mao, Xiaobo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14247-6
_version_ 1783275966144970752
author Lu, Pan
Lu, Shuai
Li, Yuanyuan
Deng, Mengmeng
Wang, Zhaohui
Mao, Xiaobo
author_facet Lu, Pan
Lu, Shuai
Li, Yuanyuan
Deng, Mengmeng
Wang, Zhaohui
Mao, Xiaobo
author_sort Lu, Pan
collection PubMed
description Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) are third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) composed of biodegradable polymers that may improve prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After five years of follow-up, BP-BES showed conflicting results compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). We performed a meta-analysis of the outcomes of studies on BP-BES and DP-DES after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at five years of follow-up. Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reported the results of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis (ST) at five years of follow-up. Five studies of a total of 4687 patients were included in the meta-analysis. At five years of follow-up, BP-BES was associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR = 0.83, 95%CI = [0.71, 0.97]), TLR (OR = 0.77, 95%CI = [0.62, 0.96]) and ST (OR = 0.60, 95%CI = [0.43 to 0.84]), whereas no significant differences in mortality, MI, or TVR rates were detected. Our results demonstrated that at five years of follow-up, BP-BES can significantly reduce the risk of MACE, TLR and ST, which indicate that safety and efficacy were increased after PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5670169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56701692017-11-15 A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lu, Pan Lu, Shuai Li, Yuanyuan Deng, Mengmeng Wang, Zhaohui Mao, Xiaobo Sci Rep Article Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) are third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) composed of biodegradable polymers that may improve prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After five years of follow-up, BP-BES showed conflicting results compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). We performed a meta-analysis of the outcomes of studies on BP-BES and DP-DES after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at five years of follow-up. Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reported the results of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis (ST) at five years of follow-up. Five studies of a total of 4687 patients were included in the meta-analysis. At five years of follow-up, BP-BES was associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR = 0.83, 95%CI = [0.71, 0.97]), TLR (OR = 0.77, 95%CI = [0.62, 0.96]) and ST (OR = 0.60, 95%CI = [0.43 to 0.84]), whereas no significant differences in mortality, MI, or TVR rates were detected. Our results demonstrated that at five years of follow-up, BP-BES can significantly reduce the risk of MACE, TLR and ST, which indicate that safety and efficacy were increased after PCI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5670169/ /pubmed/29101374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14247-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lu, Pan
Lu, Shuai
Li, Yuanyuan
Deng, Mengmeng
Wang, Zhaohui
Mao, Xiaobo
A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the main outcomes from bp-bes and dp-des at five years of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14247-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lupan acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lushuai acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyuanyuan acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengmengmeng acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhaohui acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maoxiaobo acomparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lupan comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lushuai comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyuanyuan comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengmengmeng comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhaohui comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maoxiaobo comparisonofthemainoutcomesfrombpbesanddpdesatfiveyearsoffollowupasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis