Cargando…

Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage

Machines and humans become mechanically coupled when lower limb amputees walk with powered prostheses, but these two control systems differ in adaptability. We know little about how they interact when faced with real-world physical demands (e.g. carrying loads). Here, we investigated how each system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandt, Andrea, Wen, Yue, Liu, Ming, Stallings, Jonathan, Huang, He Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14834-7
_version_ 1783275967375998976
author Brandt, Andrea
Wen, Yue
Liu, Ming
Stallings, Jonathan
Huang, He Helen
author_facet Brandt, Andrea
Wen, Yue
Liu, Ming
Stallings, Jonathan
Huang, He Helen
author_sort Brandt, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Machines and humans become mechanically coupled when lower limb amputees walk with powered prostheses, but these two control systems differ in adaptability. We know little about how they interact when faced with real-world physical demands (e.g. carrying loads). Here, we investigated how each system (i.e. amputee and powered prosthesis) responds to changes in the prosthesis mechanics and gravitational load. Five transfemoral amputees walked with and without load (i.e. weighted backpack) and a powered knee prosthesis with two pre-programmed controller settings (i.e. for load and no load). We recorded subjects’ kinematics, kinetics, and perceived exertion. Compared to the no load setting, the load setting reduced subjects’ perceived exertion and intact-limb stance time when they carried load. When subjects did not carry load, their perceived exertion and gait performance did not significantly change with controller settings. Our results suggest transfemoral amputees could benefit from load-adaptive powered knee controllers, and controller adjustments affect amputees more when they walk with (versus without) load. Further understanding of the interaction between powered prostheses, amputee users, and various environments may allow researchers to expand the utility of prostheses beyond simple environments (e.g. firm level ground without load) that represent only a subset of real-world environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5670174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56701742017-11-15 Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage Brandt, Andrea Wen, Yue Liu, Ming Stallings, Jonathan Huang, He Helen Sci Rep Article Machines and humans become mechanically coupled when lower limb amputees walk with powered prostheses, but these two control systems differ in adaptability. We know little about how they interact when faced with real-world physical demands (e.g. carrying loads). Here, we investigated how each system (i.e. amputee and powered prosthesis) responds to changes in the prosthesis mechanics and gravitational load. Five transfemoral amputees walked with and without load (i.e. weighted backpack) and a powered knee prosthesis with two pre-programmed controller settings (i.e. for load and no load). We recorded subjects’ kinematics, kinetics, and perceived exertion. Compared to the no load setting, the load setting reduced subjects’ perceived exertion and intact-limb stance time when they carried load. When subjects did not carry load, their perceived exertion and gait performance did not significantly change with controller settings. Our results suggest transfemoral amputees could benefit from load-adaptive powered knee controllers, and controller adjustments affect amputees more when they walk with (versus without) load. Further understanding of the interaction between powered prostheses, amputee users, and various environments may allow researchers to expand the utility of prostheses beyond simple environments (e.g. firm level ground without load) that represent only a subset of real-world environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5670174/ /pubmed/29101394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14834-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Brandt, Andrea
Wen, Yue
Liu, Ming
Stallings, Jonathan
Huang, He Helen
Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title_full Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title_fullStr Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title_full_unstemmed Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title_short Interactions Between Transfemoral Amputees and a Powered Knee Prosthesis During Load Carriage
title_sort interactions between transfemoral amputees and a powered knee prosthesis during load carriage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14834-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtandrea interactionsbetweentransfemoralamputeesandapoweredkneeprosthesisduringloadcarriage
AT wenyue interactionsbetweentransfemoralamputeesandapoweredkneeprosthesisduringloadcarriage
AT liuming interactionsbetweentransfemoralamputeesandapoweredkneeprosthesisduringloadcarriage
AT stallingsjonathan interactionsbetweentransfemoralamputeesandapoweredkneeprosthesisduringloadcarriage
AT huanghehelen interactionsbetweentransfemoralamputeesandapoweredkneeprosthesisduringloadcarriage