Cargando…
Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y |
_version_ | 1783275971064889344 |
---|---|
author | Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec Divieto, Carla Pavšič, Jernej Pavarelli, Stefano Dobnik, David Dreo, Tanja Bellotti, Roberto Sassi, Maria Paola Žel, Jana |
author_facet | Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec Divieto, Carla Pavšič, Jernej Pavarelli, Stefano Dobnik, David Dreo, Tanja Bellotti, Roberto Sassi, Maria Paola Žel, Jana |
author_sort | Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number determination. However, digital PCR needs to be well characterised in terms of accuracy and sources of uncertainty. With droplet digital PCR, discrepancies between the droplet volume assigned by the manufacturer and measured by independent laboratories have already been shown in previous studies. In the present study, we report on the results of an inter-laboratory comparison of different methods for droplet volume determination that is based on optical microscopy imaging and is traceable to the International System of Units. This comparison was conducted on the same DNA material, with the examination of the influence of parameters such as droplet generators, supermixes, operators, inter-cartridge and intra-cartridge variability, and droplet measuring protocol. The mean droplet volume was measured using a QX200™ AutoDG™ Droplet Digital™ PCR system and two QX100™ Droplet Digital™ PCR systems. The data show significant volume differences between these two systems, as well as significant differences in volume when different supermixes are used. We also show that both of these droplet generator systems produce droplets with significantly lower droplet volumes (13.1%, 15.9%, respectively) than stated by the manufacturer and previously measured by other laboratories. This indicates that to ensure precise quantification, the droplet volumes should be assessed for each system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5670190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56701902017-11-17 Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec Divieto, Carla Pavšič, Jernej Pavarelli, Stefano Dobnik, David Dreo, Tanja Bellotti, Roberto Sassi, Maria Paola Žel, Jana Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number determination. However, digital PCR needs to be well characterised in terms of accuracy and sources of uncertainty. With droplet digital PCR, discrepancies between the droplet volume assigned by the manufacturer and measured by independent laboratories have already been shown in previous studies. In the present study, we report on the results of an inter-laboratory comparison of different methods for droplet volume determination that is based on optical microscopy imaging and is traceable to the International System of Units. This comparison was conducted on the same DNA material, with the examination of the influence of parameters such as droplet generators, supermixes, operators, inter-cartridge and intra-cartridge variability, and droplet measuring protocol. The mean droplet volume was measured using a QX200™ AutoDG™ Droplet Digital™ PCR system and two QX100™ Droplet Digital™ PCR systems. The data show significant volume differences between these two systems, as well as significant differences in volume when different supermixes are used. We also show that both of these droplet generator systems produce droplets with significantly lower droplet volumes (13.1%, 15.9%, respectively) than stated by the manufacturer and previously measured by other laboratories. This indicates that to ensure precise quantification, the droplet volumes should be assessed for each system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5670190/ /pubmed/28921124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec Divieto, Carla Pavšič, Jernej Pavarelli, Stefano Dobnik, David Dreo, Tanja Bellotti, Roberto Sassi, Maria Paola Žel, Jana Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title | Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title_full | Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title_fullStr | Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title_short | Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR |
title_sort | droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital pcr |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosiralexandrabogozalec dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT divietocarla dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT pavsicjernej dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT pavarellistefano dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT dobnikdavid dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT dreotanja dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT bellottiroberto dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT sassimariapaola dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr AT zeljana dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr |