Cargando…

Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR

Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec, Divieto, Carla, Pavšič, Jernej, Pavarelli, Stefano, Dobnik, David, Dreo, Tanja, Bellotti, Roberto, Sassi, Maria Paola, Žel, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y
_version_ 1783275971064889344
author Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec
Divieto, Carla
Pavšič, Jernej
Pavarelli, Stefano
Dobnik, David
Dreo, Tanja
Bellotti, Roberto
Sassi, Maria Paola
Žel, Jana
author_facet Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec
Divieto, Carla
Pavšič, Jernej
Pavarelli, Stefano
Dobnik, David
Dreo, Tanja
Bellotti, Roberto
Sassi, Maria Paola
Žel, Jana
author_sort Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec
collection PubMed
description Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number determination. However, digital PCR needs to be well characterised in terms of accuracy and sources of uncertainty. With droplet digital PCR, discrepancies between the droplet volume assigned by the manufacturer and measured by independent laboratories have already been shown in previous studies. In the present study, we report on the results of an inter-laboratory comparison of different methods for droplet volume determination that is based on optical microscopy imaging and is traceable to the International System of Units. This comparison was conducted on the same DNA material, with the examination of the influence of parameters such as droplet generators, supermixes, operators, inter-cartridge and intra-cartridge variability, and droplet measuring protocol. The mean droplet volume was measured using a QX200™ AutoDG™ Droplet Digital™ PCR system and two QX100™ Droplet Digital™ PCR systems. The data show significant volume differences between these two systems, as well as significant differences in volume when different supermixes are used. We also show that both of these droplet generator systems produce droplets with significantly lower droplet volumes (13.1%, 15.9%, respectively) than stated by the manufacturer and previously measured by other laboratories. This indicates that to ensure precise quantification, the droplet volumes should be assessed for each system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5670190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56701902017-11-17 Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec Divieto, Carla Pavšič, Jernej Pavarelli, Stefano Dobnik, David Dreo, Tanja Bellotti, Roberto Sassi, Maria Paola Žel, Jana Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Accurate and precise nucleic-acid quantification is crucial for clinical and diagnostic decisions, as overestimation or underestimation can lead to misguided treatment of a disease or incorrect labelling of the products. Digital PCR is one of the best tools for absolute nucleic-acid copy-number determination. However, digital PCR needs to be well characterised in terms of accuracy and sources of uncertainty. With droplet digital PCR, discrepancies between the droplet volume assigned by the manufacturer and measured by independent laboratories have already been shown in previous studies. In the present study, we report on the results of an inter-laboratory comparison of different methods for droplet volume determination that is based on optical microscopy imaging and is traceable to the International System of Units. This comparison was conducted on the same DNA material, with the examination of the influence of parameters such as droplet generators, supermixes, operators, inter-cartridge and intra-cartridge variability, and droplet measuring protocol. The mean droplet volume was measured using a QX200™ AutoDG™ Droplet Digital™ PCR system and two QX100™ Droplet Digital™ PCR systems. The data show significant volume differences between these two systems, as well as significant differences in volume when different supermixes are used. We also show that both of these droplet generator systems produce droplets with significantly lower droplet volumes (13.1%, 15.9%, respectively) than stated by the manufacturer and previously measured by other laboratories. This indicates that to ensure precise quantification, the droplet volumes should be assessed for each system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5670190/ /pubmed/28921124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Košir, Alexandra Bogožalec
Divieto, Carla
Pavšič, Jernej
Pavarelli, Stefano
Dobnik, David
Dreo, Tanja
Bellotti, Roberto
Sassi, Maria Paola
Žel, Jana
Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title_full Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title_fullStr Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title_full_unstemmed Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title_short Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR
title_sort droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital pcr
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kosiralexandrabogozalec dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT divietocarla dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT pavsicjernej dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT pavarellistefano dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT dobnikdavid dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT dreotanja dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT bellottiroberto dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT sassimariapaola dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr
AT zeljana dropletvolumevariabilityasacriticalfactorforaccuracyofabsolutequantificationusingdropletdigitalpcr