Cargando…
Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final que...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170 |
_version_ | 1783276010287923200 |
---|---|
author | Jefferson, L. Brealey, S. Handoll, H. Keding, A. Kottam, L. Sbizzera, I. Rangan, A. |
author_facet | Jefferson, L. Brealey, S. Handoll, H. Keding, A. Kottam, L. Sbizzera, I. Rangan, A. |
author_sort | Jefferson, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. RESULTS: There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons’ clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons’ decisions to change practice. Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590–599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5670363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56703632017-11-15 Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey Jefferson, L. Brealey, S. Handoll, H. Keding, A. Kottam, L. Sbizzera, I. Rangan, A. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. RESULTS: There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons’ clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons’ decisions to change practice. Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590–599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170. 2017-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5670363/ /pubmed/29066532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170 Text en © 2017 Jefferson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jefferson, L. Brealey, S. Handoll, H. Keding, A. Kottam, L. Sbizzera, I. Rangan, A. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title | Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title_full | Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title_fullStr | Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title_short | Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey |
title_sort | impact of the profher trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: an online questionnaire survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeffersonl impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT brealeys impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT handollh impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT kedinga impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT kottaml impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT sbizzerai impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey AT rangana impactoftheprofhertrialfindingsonsurgeonsclinicalpracticeanonlinequestionnairesurvey |