Cargando…
The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy
Immunotherapies have emerged as one of the most promising approaches to treat patients with cancer. Recently, the entire medical oncology field has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoints inhibitors. Despite success in a variety of malignancies, responses typically only occur i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1325-2 |
_version_ | 1783276088161468416 |
---|---|
author | Masucci, Giuseppe V. Cesano, Alessandra Eggermont, Alexander Fox, Bernard A. Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Ciliberto, Gennaro Dobbin, Kevin Puzanov, Igor Taube, Janis Wargo, Jennifer Butterfield, Lisa H. Villabona, Lisa Thurin, Magdalena Postow, Michael A. Sondel, Paul M. Demaria, Sandra Agarwala, Sanjiv Ascierto, Paolo A. |
author_facet | Masucci, Giuseppe V. Cesano, Alessandra Eggermont, Alexander Fox, Bernard A. Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Ciliberto, Gennaro Dobbin, Kevin Puzanov, Igor Taube, Janis Wargo, Jennifer Butterfield, Lisa H. Villabona, Lisa Thurin, Magdalena Postow, Michael A. Sondel, Paul M. Demaria, Sandra Agarwala, Sanjiv Ascierto, Paolo A. |
author_sort | Masucci, Giuseppe V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunotherapies have emerged as one of the most promising approaches to treat patients with cancer. Recently, the entire medical oncology field has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoints inhibitors. Despite success in a variety of malignancies, responses typically only occur in a small percentage of patients for any given histology or treatment regimen. There are also concerns that immunotherapies are associated with immune-related toxicity as well as high costs. As such, identifying biomarkers to determine which patients are likely to derive clinical benefit from which immunotherapy and/or be susceptible to adverse side effects is a compelling clinical and social need. In addition, with several new immunotherapy agents in different phases of development, and approved therapeutics being tested in combination with a variety of different standard of care treatments, there is a requirement to stratify patients and select the most appropriate population in which to assess clinical efficacy. The opportunity to design parallel biomarkers studies that are integrated within key randomized clinical trials could be the ideal solution. Sample collection (fresh and/or archival tissue, PBMC, serum, plasma, stool, etc.) at specific points of treatment is important for evaluating possible biomarkers and studying the mechanisms of responsiveness, resistance, toxicity and relapse. This white paper proposes the creation of a network to facilitate the sharing and coordinating of samples from clinical trials to enable more in-depth analyses of correlative biomarkers than is currently possible and to assess the feasibilities, logistics, and collated interests. We propose a high standard of sample collection and storage as well as exchange of samples and knowledge through collaboration, and envisage how this could move forward using banked samples from completed studies together with prospective planning for ongoing and future clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5670700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56707002017-11-15 The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy Masucci, Giuseppe V. Cesano, Alessandra Eggermont, Alexander Fox, Bernard A. Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Ciliberto, Gennaro Dobbin, Kevin Puzanov, Igor Taube, Janis Wargo, Jennifer Butterfield, Lisa H. Villabona, Lisa Thurin, Magdalena Postow, Michael A. Sondel, Paul M. Demaria, Sandra Agarwala, Sanjiv Ascierto, Paolo A. J Transl Med Commentary Immunotherapies have emerged as one of the most promising approaches to treat patients with cancer. Recently, the entire medical oncology field has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoints inhibitors. Despite success in a variety of malignancies, responses typically only occur in a small percentage of patients for any given histology or treatment regimen. There are also concerns that immunotherapies are associated with immune-related toxicity as well as high costs. As such, identifying biomarkers to determine which patients are likely to derive clinical benefit from which immunotherapy and/or be susceptible to adverse side effects is a compelling clinical and social need. In addition, with several new immunotherapy agents in different phases of development, and approved therapeutics being tested in combination with a variety of different standard of care treatments, there is a requirement to stratify patients and select the most appropriate population in which to assess clinical efficacy. The opportunity to design parallel biomarkers studies that are integrated within key randomized clinical trials could be the ideal solution. Sample collection (fresh and/or archival tissue, PBMC, serum, plasma, stool, etc.) at specific points of treatment is important for evaluating possible biomarkers and studying the mechanisms of responsiveness, resistance, toxicity and relapse. This white paper proposes the creation of a network to facilitate the sharing and coordinating of samples from clinical trials to enable more in-depth analyses of correlative biomarkers than is currently possible and to assess the feasibilities, logistics, and collated interests. We propose a high standard of sample collection and storage as well as exchange of samples and knowledge through collaboration, and envisage how this could move forward using banked samples from completed studies together with prospective planning for ongoing and future clinical trials. BioMed Central 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5670700/ /pubmed/29100546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1325-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Masucci, Giuseppe V. Cesano, Alessandra Eggermont, Alexander Fox, Bernard A. Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Ciliberto, Gennaro Dobbin, Kevin Puzanov, Igor Taube, Janis Wargo, Jennifer Butterfield, Lisa H. Villabona, Lisa Thurin, Magdalena Postow, Michael A. Sondel, Paul M. Demaria, Sandra Agarwala, Sanjiv Ascierto, Paolo A. The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title | The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title_full | The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title_short | The need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
title_sort | need for a network to establish and validate predictive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1325-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masuccigiuseppev theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT cesanoalessandra theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT eggermontalexander theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT foxbernarda theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT wangena theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT marincolafrancescom theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT cilibertogennaro theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT dobbinkevin theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT puzanovigor theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT taubejanis theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT wargojennifer theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT butterfieldlisah theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT villabonalisa theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT thurinmagdalena theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT postowmichaela theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT sondelpaulm theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT demariasandra theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT agarwalasanjiv theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT asciertopaoloa theneedforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT masuccigiuseppev needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT cesanoalessandra needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT eggermontalexander needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT foxbernarda needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT wangena needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT marincolafrancescom needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT cilibertogennaro needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT dobbinkevin needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT puzanovigor needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT taubejanis needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT wargojennifer needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT butterfieldlisah needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT villabonalisa needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT thurinmagdalena needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT postowmichaela needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT sondelpaulm needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT demariasandra needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT agarwalasanjiv needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy AT asciertopaoloa needforanetworktoestablishandvalidatepredictivebiomarkersincancerimmunotherapy |