Cargando…

How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?

The aim of the present study was twofold. First, we wanted to examine how effector specific the effect of sequence learning by motor execution is, and second, we wanted to compare this effect with learning by motor imagery. We employed a Go/NoGo discrete sequence production task in which in each tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobierajewicz, Jagna, Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna, Jaśkowski, Wojciech, van der Lubbe, Rob H. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z
_version_ 1783276249715572736
author Sobierajewicz, Jagna
Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna
Jaśkowski, Wojciech
van der Lubbe, Rob H. J.
author_facet Sobierajewicz, Jagna
Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna
Jaśkowski, Wojciech
van der Lubbe, Rob H. J.
author_sort Sobierajewicz, Jagna
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was twofold. First, we wanted to examine how effector specific the effect of sequence learning by motor execution is, and second, we wanted to compare this effect with learning by motor imagery. We employed a Go/NoGo discrete sequence production task in which in each trial a spatial sequence of five stimuli was presented. After a Go signal the corresponding spatial response sequence had to be executed, while after a NoGo signal, the response sequence had to be mentally imagined. For the training phase, participants were divided into two groups. In the index finger group, participants had to respond (physically or mentally) with the left or right index finger, while in the hand group they had to respond with four fingers of the left or right hand. In a final test phase both execution modes were compared and all trials had to be executed. Response times and the percentage of correct responses were determined to establish learning effects. Results showed that sequence learning effects as assessed in the test phase were independent of the effector used during the training phase. Results revealed the presence of aspecific learning effects in the case of learning a required motor task with an index finger, but sequence-specific learning effects, both due to motor execution and to motor imagery, were not effector specific. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56715212017-11-17 How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery? Sobierajewicz, Jagna Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna Jaśkowski, Wojciech van der Lubbe, Rob H. J. Exp Brain Res Research Article The aim of the present study was twofold. First, we wanted to examine how effector specific the effect of sequence learning by motor execution is, and second, we wanted to compare this effect with learning by motor imagery. We employed a Go/NoGo discrete sequence production task in which in each trial a spatial sequence of five stimuli was presented. After a Go signal the corresponding spatial response sequence had to be executed, while after a NoGo signal, the response sequence had to be mentally imagined. For the training phase, participants were divided into two groups. In the index finger group, participants had to respond (physically or mentally) with the left or right index finger, while in the hand group they had to respond with four fingers of the left or right hand. In a final test phase both execution modes were compared and all trials had to be executed. Response times and the percentage of correct responses were determined to establish learning effects. Results showed that sequence learning effects as assessed in the test phase were independent of the effector used during the training phase. Results revealed the presence of aspecific learning effects in the case of learning a required motor task with an index finger, but sequence-specific learning effects, both due to motor execution and to motor imagery, were not effector specific. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5671521/ /pubmed/28965127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sobierajewicz, Jagna
Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna
Jaśkowski, Wojciech
van der Lubbe, Rob H. J.
How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title_full How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title_fullStr How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title_full_unstemmed How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title_short How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
title_sort how effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sobierajewiczjagna howeffectorspecificistheeffectofsequencelearningbymotorexecutionandmotorimagery
AT przekorackakrawczykanna howeffectorspecificistheeffectofsequencelearningbymotorexecutionandmotorimagery
AT jaskowskiwojciech howeffectorspecificistheeffectofsequencelearningbymotorexecutionandmotorimagery
AT vanderlubberobhj howeffectorspecificistheeffectofsequencelearningbymotorexecutionandmotorimagery