Cargando…
What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment
PURPOSE: Studies on healthy lifestyle interventions in survivors of colorectal cancer have been disappointing, demonstrating only modest changes. This study aims to quantify people’s preferences for different aspects of dietary intervention. METHOD: A best-worst discrete choice experiment was design...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2 |
_version_ | 1783276254570479616 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Stuart J. Gibson, Debbie Eden, Martin Lal, Simon Todd, Chris Ness, Andy Burden, Sorrel |
author_facet | Wright, Stuart J. Gibson, Debbie Eden, Martin Lal, Simon Todd, Chris Ness, Andy Burden, Sorrel |
author_sort | Wright, Stuart J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Studies on healthy lifestyle interventions in survivors of colorectal cancer have been disappointing, demonstrating only modest changes. This study aims to quantify people’s preferences for different aspects of dietary intervention. METHOD: A best-worst discrete choice experiment was designed and incorporated into a questionnaire including participants’ characteristics and a self-assessment of lifestyle. RESULTS: The response rate was 68% and 179 questionnaires were analysed. When analysing aggregate preferences, the modes of information provision selected as the most preferred were “face-to-face” (willingness to pay (WTP) £63.97, p ≤ 0.001) and “telephone” (WTP £62.36, p < 0.001) discussions whereas group discussions were preferred least (WTP −£118.96, p ≤ 0.001). Scenarios that included hospitals were most preferred (WTP £17.94, p = 0.031), and the favoured provider was bowel cancer nurses (WTP £75.11, p ≤ 0.001). When investigating preference heterogeneity, three sub-groups were identified: Firstly, “technophiles” preferring email (WTP £239.60, p ≤ 0.001) were male, were younger and had fewer risk factors. Secondly, a “one-to-one” group had strong preference for interventions over the telephone or at their local doctors and were older (WTP £642.13, p ≤ 0.001). Finally, a “person-centred” group preferred face-to-face individual or group sessions (WTP £358.79, p < 0.001) and had a high risk lifestyle. CONCLUSION: For survivors of colorectal cancer, there is not one approach that suits all when it comes to providing dietary advice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This is important information to consider when planning healthy lifestyle interventions which include dietary advice for survivors of colorectal cancer. Aligning services to individuals’ preferences has the potential to improve patient experience and outcomes by increasing uptake of healthy lifestyle advice services and promoting a more tailored approach to dietary modifications, acknowledging sub-groups of people within the total population of colorectal cancer survivors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5671542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56715422017-11-17 What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment Wright, Stuart J. Gibson, Debbie Eden, Martin Lal, Simon Todd, Chris Ness, Andy Burden, Sorrel J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Studies on healthy lifestyle interventions in survivors of colorectal cancer have been disappointing, demonstrating only modest changes. This study aims to quantify people’s preferences for different aspects of dietary intervention. METHOD: A best-worst discrete choice experiment was designed and incorporated into a questionnaire including participants’ characteristics and a self-assessment of lifestyle. RESULTS: The response rate was 68% and 179 questionnaires were analysed. When analysing aggregate preferences, the modes of information provision selected as the most preferred were “face-to-face” (willingness to pay (WTP) £63.97, p ≤ 0.001) and “telephone” (WTP £62.36, p < 0.001) discussions whereas group discussions were preferred least (WTP −£118.96, p ≤ 0.001). Scenarios that included hospitals were most preferred (WTP £17.94, p = 0.031), and the favoured provider was bowel cancer nurses (WTP £75.11, p ≤ 0.001). When investigating preference heterogeneity, three sub-groups were identified: Firstly, “technophiles” preferring email (WTP £239.60, p ≤ 0.001) were male, were younger and had fewer risk factors. Secondly, a “one-to-one” group had strong preference for interventions over the telephone or at their local doctors and were older (WTP £642.13, p ≤ 0.001). Finally, a “person-centred” group preferred face-to-face individual or group sessions (WTP £358.79, p < 0.001) and had a high risk lifestyle. CONCLUSION: For survivors of colorectal cancer, there is not one approach that suits all when it comes to providing dietary advice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This is important information to consider when planning healthy lifestyle interventions which include dietary advice for survivors of colorectal cancer. Aligning services to individuals’ preferences has the potential to improve patient experience and outcomes by increasing uptake of healthy lifestyle advice services and promoting a more tailored approach to dietary modifications, acknowledging sub-groups of people within the total population of colorectal cancer survivors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-04-20 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5671542/ /pubmed/28429186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Wright, Stuart J. Gibson, Debbie Eden, Martin Lal, Simon Todd, Chris Ness, Andy Burden, Sorrel What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title | What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title_full | What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title_fullStr | What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title_short | What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment |
title_sort | what are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? a best-worst discrete choice experiment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightstuartj whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT gibsondebbie whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT edenmartin whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT lalsimon whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT toddchris whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT nessandy whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment AT burdensorrel whatarecolorectalcancersurvivorspreferencesfordietaryadviceabestworstdiscretechoiceexperiment |