Cargando…

The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?

Spatial neglect after stroke can be a challenging syndrome to diagnose under standard neuropsychological assessment. There is now sufficient evidence that those affected might demonstrate neglect behavior in everyday settings despite showing no signs of neglect during common neglect tasks. This disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grech, Megan, Stuart, Tracey, Williams, Lindy, Chen, Celia, Loetscher, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00563
_version_ 1783276259742056448
author Grech, Megan
Stuart, Tracey
Williams, Lindy
Chen, Celia
Loetscher, Tobias
author_facet Grech, Megan
Stuart, Tracey
Williams, Lindy
Chen, Celia
Loetscher, Tobias
author_sort Grech, Megan
collection PubMed
description Spatial neglect after stroke can be a challenging syndrome to diagnose under standard neuropsychological assessment. There is now sufficient evidence that those affected might demonstrate neglect behavior in everyday settings despite showing no signs of neglect during common neglect tasks. This discrepancy is attributed to the simplified and unrealistic nature of common pen and paper based tasks that do not match the demanding, novel, and complex environment of everyday life. As such, increasing task demands under more ecologically valid scenarios has become an important method of increasing test sensitivity. The main aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Mobility Assessment Course (MAC), an ecological task, for the assessment of neglect. If neglect becomes more apparent under more challenging task demands the MAC could prove to be more diagnostically accurate at detecting neglect than conventional methods, particularly as the time from initial brain damage increases. Data collected by Guide Dogs of SA/NT were retrospectively analyzed. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, a measure of sensitivity and specificity, was used to investigate the diagnostic utility of the MAC and a series of paper and pencil tests in 67 right hemisphere stroke survivors. While the MAC proved to be a more sensitive neglect test (74.2%) when compared to the Star Cancellation (43.3%) and Line Bisection (35.7%) tests, this was at the expense of relatively low specificity. As a result, the ROC curve analysis showed no statistically discernable differences between tasks (p > 0.12), or between subacute and chronic groups for individual tasks (p > 0.45). It is concluded that, while the MAC is an ecologically valid alternative for assessing neglect, regarding its diagnostic accuracy, there is currently not enough evidence to suggest that it is a big step forward in comparison to the accuracy of conventional tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56715632017-11-21 The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward? Grech, Megan Stuart, Tracey Williams, Lindy Chen, Celia Loetscher, Tobias Front Neurol Neuroscience Spatial neglect after stroke can be a challenging syndrome to diagnose under standard neuropsychological assessment. There is now sufficient evidence that those affected might demonstrate neglect behavior in everyday settings despite showing no signs of neglect during common neglect tasks. This discrepancy is attributed to the simplified and unrealistic nature of common pen and paper based tasks that do not match the demanding, novel, and complex environment of everyday life. As such, increasing task demands under more ecologically valid scenarios has become an important method of increasing test sensitivity. The main aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Mobility Assessment Course (MAC), an ecological task, for the assessment of neglect. If neglect becomes more apparent under more challenging task demands the MAC could prove to be more diagnostically accurate at detecting neglect than conventional methods, particularly as the time from initial brain damage increases. Data collected by Guide Dogs of SA/NT were retrospectively analyzed. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, a measure of sensitivity and specificity, was used to investigate the diagnostic utility of the MAC and a series of paper and pencil tests in 67 right hemisphere stroke survivors. While the MAC proved to be a more sensitive neglect test (74.2%) when compared to the Star Cancellation (43.3%) and Line Bisection (35.7%) tests, this was at the expense of relatively low specificity. As a result, the ROC curve analysis showed no statistically discernable differences between tasks (p > 0.12), or between subacute and chronic groups for individual tasks (p > 0.45). It is concluded that, while the MAC is an ecologically valid alternative for assessing neglect, regarding its diagnostic accuracy, there is currently not enough evidence to suggest that it is a big step forward in comparison to the accuracy of conventional tests. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5671563/ /pubmed/29163331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00563 Text en Copyright © 2017 Grech, Stuart, Williams, Chen and Loetscher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Grech, Megan
Stuart, Tracey
Williams, Lindy
Chen, Celia
Loetscher, Tobias
The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title_full The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title_fullStr The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title_full_unstemmed The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title_short The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?
title_sort mobility assessment course for the diagnosis of spatial neglect: taking a step forward?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00563
work_keys_str_mv AT grechmegan themobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT stuarttracey themobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT williamslindy themobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT chencelia themobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT loetschertobias themobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT grechmegan mobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT stuarttracey mobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT williamslindy mobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT chencelia mobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward
AT loetschertobias mobilityassessmentcourseforthediagnosisofspatialneglecttakingastepforward