Cargando…

Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure specific for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment, treatment options, and medical care. METHODS: Patients with SLE were recruited from four US rheumatology practices. Concep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathias, Susan D., Berry, Pamela, Pascoe, Katie, de Vries, Jane, Askanase, Anca D., Colwell, Hilary H., Chang, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000495
_version_ 1783276306760204288
author Mathias, Susan D.
Berry, Pamela
Pascoe, Katie
de Vries, Jane
Askanase, Anca D.
Colwell, Hilary H.
Chang, David J.
author_facet Mathias, Susan D.
Berry, Pamela
Pascoe, Katie
de Vries, Jane
Askanase, Anca D.
Colwell, Hilary H.
Chang, David J.
author_sort Mathias, Susan D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure specific for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment, treatment options, and medical care. METHODS: Patients with SLE were recruited from four US rheumatology practices. Concept elicitation interviews identified aspects that patients considered important and relevant regarding satisfaction with treatment and medical care. Concept elicitation interviews and clinical input were used to draft the Lupus Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ). A second cohort of patients with SLE participated in combined concept elicitation/cognitive debriefing interviews, after which the LSQ was revised. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed concept elicitation interviews: 93% were female, 57% were white, and 85% had moderate/severe SLE. Current treatments included hydroxychloroquine (93%), steroids (79%), and belimumab (57%), and 43% were biologic naive. Patients were generally satisfied with their treatment and medical care; however, they were dissatisfied with treatment adverse effects and the number of available treatment options. Cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 8) demonstrated that the LSQ was comprehensive, clear, and relevant; therefore, only minor revisions were made to the questionnaire. The LSQ assesses satisfaction with current SLE treatments (25 items), medical care (11 items), and insurance coverage (3 items). The draft LSQ was evaluated in 195 adults with SLE. Fifty-eight percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat satisfied” with their SLE treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The LSQ has been developed to assess treatment satisfaction among patients with SLE. Following further testing to support its validity and reliability, it will provide a useful tool to facilitate assessment of satisfaction with treatments for SLE and help inform treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56717852017-11-22 Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Mathias, Susan D. Berry, Pamela Pascoe, Katie de Vries, Jane Askanase, Anca D. Colwell, Hilary H. Chang, David J. J Clin Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure specific for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment, treatment options, and medical care. METHODS: Patients with SLE were recruited from four US rheumatology practices. Concept elicitation interviews identified aspects that patients considered important and relevant regarding satisfaction with treatment and medical care. Concept elicitation interviews and clinical input were used to draft the Lupus Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ). A second cohort of patients with SLE participated in combined concept elicitation/cognitive debriefing interviews, after which the LSQ was revised. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed concept elicitation interviews: 93% were female, 57% were white, and 85% had moderate/severe SLE. Current treatments included hydroxychloroquine (93%), steroids (79%), and belimumab (57%), and 43% were biologic naive. Patients were generally satisfied with their treatment and medical care; however, they were dissatisfied with treatment adverse effects and the number of available treatment options. Cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 8) demonstrated that the LSQ was comprehensive, clear, and relevant; therefore, only minor revisions were made to the questionnaire. The LSQ assesses satisfaction with current SLE treatments (25 items), medical care (11 items), and insurance coverage (3 items). The draft LSQ was evaluated in 195 adults with SLE. Fifty-eight percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat satisfied” with their SLE treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The LSQ has been developed to assess treatment satisfaction among patients with SLE. Following further testing to support its validity and reliability, it will provide a useful tool to facilitate assessment of satisfaction with treatments for SLE and help inform treatment decisions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-03 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5671785/ /pubmed/28225511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000495 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mathias, Susan D.
Berry, Pamela
Pascoe, Katie
de Vries, Jane
Askanase, Anca D.
Colwell, Hilary H.
Chang, David J.
Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title_full Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title_fullStr Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title_short Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
title_sort treatment satisfaction in systemic lupus erythematosus: development of a patient-reported outcome measure
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000495
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiassusand treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT berrypamela treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT pascoekatie treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT devriesjane treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT askanaseancad treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT colwellhilaryh treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT changdavidj treatmentsatisfactioninsystemiclupuserythematosusdevelopmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure