Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852 |
_version_ | 1783276308215627776 |
---|---|
author | Donofrio, Lisa Carruthers, Alastair Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Jones, Derek Sykes, Jonathan M. Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara |
author_facet | Donofrio, Lisa Carruthers, Alastair Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Jones, Derek Sykes, Jonathan M. Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara |
author_sort | Donofrio, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHODS: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96–1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38–0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5671791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56717912017-11-22 Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture Donofrio, Lisa Carruthers, Alastair Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Jones, Derek Sykes, Jonathan M. Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHODS: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96–1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38–0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-10 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5671791/ /pubmed/27661744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852 Text en © 2016 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Donofrio, Lisa Carruthers, Alastair Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Jones, Derek Sykes, Jonathan M. Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture |
title_sort | development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial skin texture |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donofriolisa developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT carruthersalastair developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT hardasbhushan developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT murphydianek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT carruthersjean developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT jonesderek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT sykesjonathanm developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT creutzlela developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT marxann developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture AT dillsara developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture |