Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture

BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donofrio, Lisa, Carruthers, Alastair, Hardas, Bhushan, Murphy, Diane K., Carruthers, Jean, Jones, Derek, Sykes, Jonathan M., Creutz, Lela, Marx, Ann, Dill, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852
_version_ 1783276308215627776
author Donofrio, Lisa
Carruthers, Alastair
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Jones, Derek
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
author_facet Donofrio, Lisa
Carruthers, Alastair
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Jones, Derek
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
author_sort Donofrio, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHODS: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96–1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38–0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56717912017-11-22 Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture Donofrio, Lisa Carruthers, Alastair Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Jones, Derek Sykes, Jonathan M. Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. METHODS: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96–1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38–0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-10 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5671791/ /pubmed/27661744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852 Text en © 2016 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Donofrio, Lisa
Carruthers, Alastair
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Jones, Derek
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title_full Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title_short Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Skin Texture
title_sort development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial skin texture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852
work_keys_str_mv AT donofriolisa developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT carruthersalastair developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT hardasbhushan developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT murphydianek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT carruthersjean developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT jonesderek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT sykesjonathanm developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT creutzlela developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT marxann developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture
AT dillsara developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationoffacialskintexture