Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Aller...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855 |
_version_ | 1783276310625255424 |
---|---|
author | Carruthers, Alastair Donofrio, Lisa Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Sykes, Jonathan M. Jones, Derek Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara |
author_facet | Carruthers, Alastair Donofrio, Lisa Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Sykes, Jonathan M. Jones, Derek Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara |
author_sort | Carruthers, Alastair |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 295) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically significant difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.06 [0.91–1.21] for clinically different image pairs and 0.38 [0.26–0.51] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was almost perfect (mean weighted kappa = 0.87). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.86, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of static horizontal forehead lines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5671802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56718022017-11-22 Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines Carruthers, Alastair Donofrio, Lisa Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Sykes, Jonathan M. Jones, Derek Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 295) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically significant difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.06 [0.91–1.21] for clinically different image pairs and 0.38 [0.26–0.51] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was almost perfect (mean weighted kappa = 0.87). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.86, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of static horizontal forehead lines. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-10 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5671802/ /pubmed/27661747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855 Text en © 2016 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Carruthers, Alastair Donofrio, Lisa Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Sykes, Jonathan M. Jones, Derek Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines |
title_sort | development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of static horizontal forehead lines |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carruthersalastair developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT donofriolisa developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT hardasbhushan developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT murphydianek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT carruthersjean developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT sykesjonathanm developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT jonesderek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT creutzlela developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT marxann developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines AT dillsara developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines |