Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines

BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Aller...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carruthers, Alastair, Donofrio, Lisa, Hardas, Bhushan, Murphy, Diane K., Carruthers, Jean, Sykes, Jonathan M., Jones, Derek, Creutz, Lela, Marx, Ann, Dill, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855
_version_ 1783276310625255424
author Carruthers, Alastair
Donofrio, Lisa
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Jones, Derek
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
author_facet Carruthers, Alastair
Donofrio, Lisa
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Jones, Derek
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
author_sort Carruthers, Alastair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 295) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically significant difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.06 [0.91–1.21] for clinically different image pairs and 0.38 [0.26–0.51] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was almost perfect (mean weighted kappa = 0.87). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.86, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of static horizontal forehead lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56718022017-11-22 Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines Carruthers, Alastair Donofrio, Lisa Hardas, Bhushan Murphy, Diane K. Carruthers, Jean Sykes, Jonathan M. Jones, Derek Creutz, Lela Marx, Ann Dill, Sara Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of static forehead lines before and after treatment in practice and clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Forehead Lines Scale. METHODS: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 295) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically significant difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.06 [0.91–1.21] for clinically different image pairs and 0.38 [0.26–0.51] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was almost perfect (mean weighted kappa = 0.87). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.86, primary end point). CONCLUSION: The Allergan Forehead Lines Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of static horizontal forehead lines. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-10 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5671802/ /pubmed/27661747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855 Text en © 2016 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Carruthers, Alastair
Donofrio, Lisa
Hardas, Bhushan
Murphy, Diane K.
Carruthers, Jean
Sykes, Jonathan M.
Jones, Derek
Creutz, Lela
Marx, Ann
Dill, Sara
Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title_full Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title_short Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Static Horizontal Forehead Lines
title_sort development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of static horizontal forehead lines
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27661747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000855
work_keys_str_mv AT carruthersalastair developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT donofriolisa developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT hardasbhushan developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT murphydianek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT carruthersjean developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT sykesjonathanm developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT jonesderek developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT creutzlela developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT marxann developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines
AT dillsara developmentandvalidationofaphotonumericscaleforevaluationofstatichorizontalforeheadlines