Cargando…

The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature

Background: Osteomyelitis is a complex disease. Treatment involves a combination of bone resection, antimicrobials and soft-tissue coverage. There is a difficulty in unifying a classification system for long bone osteomyelitis that is generally accepted. Objectives: In this systematic review, we aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotchen, Andrew J., McNally, Martin A., Sendi, Parham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119075
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.21050
_version_ 1783276331046273024
author Hotchen, Andrew J.
McNally, Martin A.
Sendi, Parham
author_facet Hotchen, Andrew J.
McNally, Martin A.
Sendi, Parham
author_sort Hotchen, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Osteomyelitis is a complex disease. Treatment involves a combination of bone resection, antimicrobials and soft-tissue coverage. There is a difficulty in unifying a classification system for long bone osteomyelitis that is generally accepted. Objectives: In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the classification systems for long bone osteomyelitis that have been presented within the literature. By doing this, we hope to elucidate the important variables that are required when classifying osteomyelitis. Methods: A complete search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Ovid databases was undertaken. Following exclusion criteria, 13 classification systems for long-bone osteomyelitis were included for review. Results: The 13 classification systems that were included for review presented seven different variables that were used for classification. Ten of them used only one main variable, two used two variables and one used seven variables. The variables included bone involvement (used in 7 classification systems), acute versus chronic infection (used in 6), aetiopathogenesis (used in 3), host status (used in 3), soft tissue (used in 2), microbiology (used in 1) and location of infected bone (used in 1). The purpose of each classification system could be grouped as either descriptive (3 classification systems), prognostic (4) or for management (4). Two of the 13 classification systems were for both prognostic and management purposes. Conclusions: This systematic review has demonstrated a variety of variables used for classification of long bone osteomyelitis. While some variables are used to guide management and rehabilitation after surgery (e.g., bone defect, soft tissue coverage), others were postulated to provide prognostic information (e.g., host status). Finally, some variables were used for descriptive purposes only (aetiopathogenesis). In our view and from today's perspective, bone involvement, antimicrobial resistance patterns of causative micro-organisms, the need for soft-tissue coverage and host status are important variables to include in a classification system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56719292017-11-08 The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature Hotchen, Andrew J. McNally, Martin A. Sendi, Parham J Bone Jt Infect Review Background: Osteomyelitis is a complex disease. Treatment involves a combination of bone resection, antimicrobials and soft-tissue coverage. There is a difficulty in unifying a classification system for long bone osteomyelitis that is generally accepted. Objectives: In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the classification systems for long bone osteomyelitis that have been presented within the literature. By doing this, we hope to elucidate the important variables that are required when classifying osteomyelitis. Methods: A complete search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Ovid databases was undertaken. Following exclusion criteria, 13 classification systems for long-bone osteomyelitis were included for review. Results: The 13 classification systems that were included for review presented seven different variables that were used for classification. Ten of them used only one main variable, two used two variables and one used seven variables. The variables included bone involvement (used in 7 classification systems), acute versus chronic infection (used in 6), aetiopathogenesis (used in 3), host status (used in 3), soft tissue (used in 2), microbiology (used in 1) and location of infected bone (used in 1). The purpose of each classification system could be grouped as either descriptive (3 classification systems), prognostic (4) or for management (4). Two of the 13 classification systems were for both prognostic and management purposes. Conclusions: This systematic review has demonstrated a variety of variables used for classification of long bone osteomyelitis. While some variables are used to guide management and rehabilitation after surgery (e.g., bone defect, soft tissue coverage), others were postulated to provide prognostic information (e.g., host status). Finally, some variables were used for descriptive purposes only (aetiopathogenesis). In our view and from today's perspective, bone involvement, antimicrobial resistance patterns of causative micro-organisms, the need for soft-tissue coverage and host status are important variables to include in a classification system. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5671929/ /pubmed/29119075 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.21050 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Review
Hotchen, Andrew J.
McNally, Martin A.
Sendi, Parham
The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title_full The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title_short The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature
title_sort classification of long bone osteomyelitis: a systemic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119075
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.21050
work_keys_str_mv AT hotchenandrewj theclassificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature
AT mcnallymartina theclassificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature
AT sendiparham theclassificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature
AT hotchenandrewj classificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature
AT mcnallymartina classificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature
AT sendiparham classificationoflongboneosteomyelitisasystemicreviewoftheliterature