Cargando…
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recomm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423 |
_version_ | 1783276338264670208 |
---|---|
author | Gejerman, Glen Ciccone, Patrick Goldstein, Martin Lanteri, Vincent Schlecker, Burton Sanzone, John Esposito, Michael Rome, Sergey Ciccone, Michael Margolis, Eric Simon, Robert Guo, Yijun Pentakota, Sri-Ram Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein |
author_facet | Gejerman, Glen Ciccone, Patrick Goldstein, Martin Lanteri, Vincent Schlecker, Burton Sanzone, John Esposito, Michael Rome, Sergey Ciccone, Michael Margolis, Eric Simon, Robert Guo, Yijun Pentakota, Sri-Ram Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein |
author_sort | Gejerman, Glen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. RESULTS: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5671961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56719612017-11-09 US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses Gejerman, Glen Ciccone, Patrick Goldstein, Martin Lanteri, Vincent Schlecker, Burton Sanzone, John Esposito, Michael Rome, Sergey Ciccone, Michael Margolis, Eric Simon, Robert Guo, Yijun Pentakota, Sri-Ram Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. RESULTS: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening. The Korean Urological Association 2017-11 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5671961/ /pubmed/29124241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gejerman, Glen Ciccone, Patrick Goldstein, Martin Lanteri, Vincent Schlecker, Burton Sanzone, John Esposito, Michael Rome, Sergey Ciccone, Michael Margolis, Eric Simon, Robert Guo, Yijun Pentakota, Sri-Ram Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title | US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_full | US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_fullStr | US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_full_unstemmed | US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_short | US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_sort | us preventive services task force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher gleason score diagnoses |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gejermanglen uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT cicconepatrick uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT goldsteinmartin uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT lanterivincent uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT schleckerburton uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT sanzonejohn uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT espositomichael uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT romesergey uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT cicconemichael uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT margoliseric uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT simonrobert uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT guoyijun uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT pentakotasriram uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT sadheginejadhossein uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses |