Cargando…

US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recomm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gejerman, Glen, Ciccone, Patrick, Goldstein, Martin, Lanteri, Vincent, Schlecker, Burton, Sanzone, John, Esposito, Michael, Rome, Sergey, Ciccone, Michael, Margolis, Eric, Simon, Robert, Guo, Yijun, Pentakota, Sri-Ram, Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124241
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423
_version_ 1783276338264670208
author Gejerman, Glen
Ciccone, Patrick
Goldstein, Martin
Lanteri, Vincent
Schlecker, Burton
Sanzone, John
Esposito, Michael
Rome, Sergey
Ciccone, Michael
Margolis, Eric
Simon, Robert
Guo, Yijun
Pentakota, Sri-Ram
Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein
author_facet Gejerman, Glen
Ciccone, Patrick
Goldstein, Martin
Lanteri, Vincent
Schlecker, Burton
Sanzone, John
Esposito, Michael
Rome, Sergey
Ciccone, Michael
Margolis, Eric
Simon, Robert
Guo, Yijun
Pentakota, Sri-Ram
Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein
author_sort Gejerman, Glen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. RESULTS: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5671961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56719612017-11-09 US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses Gejerman, Glen Ciccone, Patrick Goldstein, Martin Lanteri, Vincent Schlecker, Burton Sanzone, John Esposito, Michael Rome, Sergey Ciccone, Michael Margolis, Eric Simon, Robert Guo, Yijun Pentakota, Sri-Ram Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. RESULTS: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening. The Korean Urological Association 2017-11 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5671961/ /pubmed/29124241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gejerman, Glen
Ciccone, Patrick
Goldstein, Martin
Lanteri, Vincent
Schlecker, Burton
Sanzone, John
Esposito, Michael
Rome, Sergey
Ciccone, Michael
Margolis, Eric
Simon, Robert
Guo, Yijun
Pentakota, Sri-Ram
Sadhegi-Nejad, Hossein
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title_full US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title_fullStr US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title_full_unstemmed US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title_short US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
title_sort us preventive services task force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher gleason score diagnoses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5671961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124241
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423
work_keys_str_mv AT gejermanglen uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT cicconepatrick uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT goldsteinmartin uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT lanterivincent uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT schleckerburton uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT sanzonejohn uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT espositomichael uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT romesergey uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT cicconemichael uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT margoliseric uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT simonrobert uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT guoyijun uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT pentakotasriram uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses
AT sadheginejadhossein uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses