Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypotensive anesthesia technique is used to reduce intraoperative bleeding and to improve the visibility of the operative field. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of desflurane with and without labetalol for producing hypotensive anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Neha, Talwar, Vandana, Prakash, Smita, Deuri, Achyut, Gogia, Anoop Raj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109639
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_350_15
_version_ 1783276448525582336
author Gupta, Neha
Talwar, Vandana
Prakash, Smita
Deuri, Achyut
Gogia, Anoop Raj
author_facet Gupta, Neha
Talwar, Vandana
Prakash, Smita
Deuri, Achyut
Gogia, Anoop Raj
author_sort Gupta, Neha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypotensive anesthesia technique is used to reduce intraoperative bleeding and to improve the visibility of the operative field. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of desflurane with and without labetalol for producing hypotensive anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective middle ear surgery were administered general anesthesia and randomly divided into two groups – Group D and Group L. The target mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 55–65 mmHg during hypotensive period. Group D patients received an increasing concentration of desflurane alone. Group L patients received 3% desflurane plus labetalol (loading dose 0.3 mg/kg intravenously, followed by 10 mg increments every 10 min). Student's t-test and paired t-test were used to compare the hemodynamic parameters. Visibility of the operative field, anesthetic and rescue drug requirement, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, time taken for induction and reversal of hypotension and recovery characteristics were noted. RESULTS: Target MAP was achieved in both the groups. Group D was associated with a higher mean heart rate compared with Group L (77.3 ± 11.0/min vs. 70.5 ± 2.5/min, respectively; P < 0.001) during the hypotensive period, along with a higher requirement for desflurane (P = 0.000) and metoprolol (P = 0.01). Time taken to achieve target MAP was lesser in Group L compared with Group D (33.7 ± 7.1 vs. 39.8 ± 6.2 min, respectively; P = 0.000). Time taken to return to baseline MAP was faster in Group D (P = 0.03). Emergence time was longer with desflurane alone (P = 0.000) resulting in greater sedation (P = 0.000) in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Although desflurane is effective for inducing deliberate hypotension in middle ear microsurgery, the combination of desflurane with labetalol is associated with decreased requirement of desflurane, absence of reflex tachycardia, faster induction of hypotension, faster recovery from anesthesia, and less postoperative sedation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5672504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56725042017-11-06 Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery Gupta, Neha Talwar, Vandana Prakash, Smita Deuri, Achyut Gogia, Anoop Raj J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypotensive anesthesia technique is used to reduce intraoperative bleeding and to improve the visibility of the operative field. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of desflurane with and without labetalol for producing hypotensive anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective middle ear surgery were administered general anesthesia and randomly divided into two groups – Group D and Group L. The target mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 55–65 mmHg during hypotensive period. Group D patients received an increasing concentration of desflurane alone. Group L patients received 3% desflurane plus labetalol (loading dose 0.3 mg/kg intravenously, followed by 10 mg increments every 10 min). Student's t-test and paired t-test were used to compare the hemodynamic parameters. Visibility of the operative field, anesthetic and rescue drug requirement, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, time taken for induction and reversal of hypotension and recovery characteristics were noted. RESULTS: Target MAP was achieved in both the groups. Group D was associated with a higher mean heart rate compared with Group L (77.3 ± 11.0/min vs. 70.5 ± 2.5/min, respectively; P < 0.001) during the hypotensive period, along with a higher requirement for desflurane (P = 0.000) and metoprolol (P = 0.01). Time taken to achieve target MAP was lesser in Group L compared with Group D (33.7 ± 7.1 vs. 39.8 ± 6.2 min, respectively; P = 0.000). Time taken to return to baseline MAP was faster in Group D (P = 0.03). Emergence time was longer with desflurane alone (P = 0.000) resulting in greater sedation (P = 0.000) in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Although desflurane is effective for inducing deliberate hypotension in middle ear microsurgery, the combination of desflurane with labetalol is associated with decreased requirement of desflurane, absence of reflex tachycardia, faster induction of hypotension, faster recovery from anesthesia, and less postoperative sedation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5672504/ /pubmed/29109639 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_350_15 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Neha
Talwar, Vandana
Prakash, Smita
Deuri, Achyut
Gogia, Anoop Raj
Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109639
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_350_15
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaneha evaluationoftheefficacyofdesfluranewithorwithoutlabetalolforhypotensiveanesthesiainmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT talwarvandana evaluationoftheefficacyofdesfluranewithorwithoutlabetalolforhypotensiveanesthesiainmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT prakashsmita evaluationoftheefficacyofdesfluranewithorwithoutlabetalolforhypotensiveanesthesiainmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT deuriachyut evaluationoftheefficacyofdesfluranewithorwithoutlabetalolforhypotensiveanesthesiainmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT gogiaanoopraj evaluationoftheefficacyofdesfluranewithorwithoutlabetalolforhypotensiveanesthesiainmiddleearmicrosurgery