Cargando…
How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
Purpose The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods A review of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900 |
_version_ | 1783276517688606720 |
---|---|
author | Rosa, Donato Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca Balato, Giovanni D'Addona, Alessio Smeraglia, Francesco Correra, Gaetano Di Vico, Gianni |
author_facet | Rosa, Donato Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca Balato, Giovanni D'Addona, Alessio Smeraglia, Francesco Correra, Gaetano Di Vico, Gianni |
author_sort | Rosa, Donato |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods A review of the literature was performed focusing on failed cartilage repair and related treatments. Two of the authors independently screened articles. Conflicts about the inclusion of a paper was resolved by further evaluation by the senior author. Review articles, articles written in languages different from/other than English, case reports, and papers that did not evaluate the outcomes of interest were excluded. Full-text version of each included paper was obtained and relevant data were extracted and collected in a database. Results At the end of the screening process, 31 articles were included. Microfractures and mosaicplasty showed a nonnegligible failure rate at short- and midterm. Better results, especially in terms of time to failure or revision, were reported with the use of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Regarding the treatment of failed cartilage repair, the use of OCA transplantation in patients with previous failed cartilage repair may be a safe option. The revision of failed OCA transplantation with further OCA seems to have a greater failure rate. Patients with previous failed ACI or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) who underwent further MACI or ACI reported acceptable results. Otherwise, ACI in patients with history of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (SMS) demonstrated a greater failure rate. Conclusion From the analysis of the literature, OCA transplantation seems to be the most reliable treatment of a failed SMS. ACI or MACI showed acceptable results in patients with previously failed MACI or ACI. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5672873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56728732017-11-07 How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review Rosa, Donato Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca Balato, Giovanni D'Addona, Alessio Smeraglia, Francesco Correra, Gaetano Di Vico, Gianni Joints Purpose The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods A review of the literature was performed focusing on failed cartilage repair and related treatments. Two of the authors independently screened articles. Conflicts about the inclusion of a paper was resolved by further evaluation by the senior author. Review articles, articles written in languages different from/other than English, case reports, and papers that did not evaluate the outcomes of interest were excluded. Full-text version of each included paper was obtained and relevant data were extracted and collected in a database. Results At the end of the screening process, 31 articles were included. Microfractures and mosaicplasty showed a nonnegligible failure rate at short- and midterm. Better results, especially in terms of time to failure or revision, were reported with the use of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Regarding the treatment of failed cartilage repair, the use of OCA transplantation in patients with previous failed cartilage repair may be a safe option. The revision of failed OCA transplantation with further OCA seems to have a greater failure rate. Patients with previous failed ACI or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) who underwent further MACI or ACI reported acceptable results. Otherwise, ACI in patients with history of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (SMS) demonstrated a greater failure rate. Conclusion From the analysis of the literature, OCA transplantation seems to be the most reliable treatment of a failed SMS. ACI or MACI showed acceptable results in patients with previously failed MACI or ACI. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5672873/ /pubmed/29114638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Rosa, Donato Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca Balato, Giovanni D'Addona, Alessio Smeraglia, Francesco Correra, Gaetano Di Vico, Gianni How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | how to manage a failed cartilage repair: a systematic literature review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosadonato howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT didonatosigismondoluca howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT balatogiovanni howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT daddonaalessio howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT smeragliafrancesco howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT correragaetano howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview AT divicogianni howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview |