Cargando…

How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review

Purpose  The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods  A review of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Donato, Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca, Balato, Giovanni, D'Addona, Alessio, Smeraglia, Francesco, Correra, Gaetano, Di Vico, Gianni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900
_version_ 1783276517688606720
author Rosa, Donato
Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca
Balato, Giovanni
D'Addona, Alessio
Smeraglia, Francesco
Correra, Gaetano
Di Vico, Gianni
author_facet Rosa, Donato
Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca
Balato, Giovanni
D'Addona, Alessio
Smeraglia, Francesco
Correra, Gaetano
Di Vico, Gianni
author_sort Rosa, Donato
collection PubMed
description Purpose  The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods  A review of the literature was performed focusing on failed cartilage repair and related treatments. Two of the authors independently screened articles. Conflicts about the inclusion of a paper was resolved by further evaluation by the senior author. Review articles, articles written in languages different from/other than English, case reports, and papers that did not evaluate the outcomes of interest were excluded. Full-text version of each included paper was obtained and relevant data were extracted and collected in a database. Results  At the end of the screening process, 31 articles were included. Microfractures and mosaicplasty showed a nonnegligible failure rate at short- and midterm. Better results, especially in terms of time to failure or revision, were reported with the use of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Regarding the treatment of failed cartilage repair, the use of OCA transplantation in patients with previous failed cartilage repair may be a safe option. The revision of failed OCA transplantation with further OCA seems to have a greater failure rate. Patients with previous failed ACI or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) who underwent further MACI or ACI reported acceptable results. Otherwise, ACI in patients with history of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (SMS) demonstrated a greater failure rate. Conclusion  From the analysis of the literature, OCA transplantation seems to be the most reliable treatment of a failed SMS. ACI or MACI showed acceptable results in patients with previously failed MACI or ACI. Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5672873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56728732017-11-07 How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review Rosa, Donato Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca Balato, Giovanni D'Addona, Alessio Smeraglia, Francesco Correra, Gaetano Di Vico, Gianni Joints Purpose  The aims of this paper are to report the rate and risk factors for the failure of the most common cartilage repair technique, and analyze the most important factors that could influence the choice of a specific surgical treatment to revise a failed cartilage repair. Methods  A review of the literature was performed focusing on failed cartilage repair and related treatments. Two of the authors independently screened articles. Conflicts about the inclusion of a paper was resolved by further evaluation by the senior author. Review articles, articles written in languages different from/other than English, case reports, and papers that did not evaluate the outcomes of interest were excluded. Full-text version of each included paper was obtained and relevant data were extracted and collected in a database. Results  At the end of the screening process, 31 articles were included. Microfractures and mosaicplasty showed a nonnegligible failure rate at short- and midterm. Better results, especially in terms of time to failure or revision, were reported with the use of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Regarding the treatment of failed cartilage repair, the use of OCA transplantation in patients with previous failed cartilage repair may be a safe option. The revision of failed OCA transplantation with further OCA seems to have a greater failure rate. Patients with previous failed ACI or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) who underwent further MACI or ACI reported acceptable results. Otherwise, ACI in patients with history of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (SMS) demonstrated a greater failure rate. Conclusion  From the analysis of the literature, OCA transplantation seems to be the most reliable treatment of a failed SMS. ACI or MACI showed acceptable results in patients with previously failed MACI or ACI. Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5672873/ /pubmed/29114638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rosa, Donato
Di Donato, Sigismondo Luca
Balato, Giovanni
D'Addona, Alessio
Smeraglia, Francesco
Correra, Gaetano
Di Vico, Gianni
How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort how to manage a failed cartilage repair: a systematic literature review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603900
work_keys_str_mv AT rosadonato howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT didonatosigismondoluca howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT balatogiovanni howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT daddonaalessio howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT smeragliafrancesco howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT correragaetano howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview
AT divicogianni howtomanageafailedcartilagerepairasystematicliteraturereview