Cargando…

Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations

BACKGROUND: The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involvin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gollins, Simon, West, Nick, Sebag-Montefiore, David, Myint, Arthur Sun, Saunders, Mark, Susnerwala, Shabbir, Quirke, Phil, Essapen, Sharadah, Samuel, Leslie, Sizer, Bruce, Worlding, Jane, Southward, Katie, Hemmings, Gemma, Tinkler-Hundal, Emma, Taylor, Morag, Bottomley, Daniel, Chambers, Philip, Lawrie, Emma, Lopes, Andre, Beare, Sandy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.294
_version_ 1783276524503302144
author Gollins, Simon
West, Nick
Sebag-Montefiore, David
Myint, Arthur Sun
Saunders, Mark
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Quirke, Phil
Essapen, Sharadah
Samuel, Leslie
Sizer, Bruce
Worlding, Jane
Southward, Katie
Hemmings, Gemma
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Taylor, Morag
Bottomley, Daniel
Chambers, Philip
Lawrie, Emma
Lopes, Andre
Beare, Sandy
author_facet Gollins, Simon
West, Nick
Sebag-Montefiore, David
Myint, Arthur Sun
Saunders, Mark
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Quirke, Phil
Essapen, Sharadah
Samuel, Leslie
Sizer, Bruce
Worlding, Jane
Southward, Katie
Hemmings, Gemma
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Taylor, Morag
Bottomley, Daniel
Chambers, Philip
Lawrie, Emma
Lopes, Andre
Beare, Sandy
author_sort Gollins, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73–88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty–four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05–1.03, P=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5672930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56729302017-11-09 Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations Gollins, Simon West, Nick Sebag-Montefiore, David Myint, Arthur Sun Saunders, Mark Susnerwala, Shabbir Quirke, Phil Essapen, Sharadah Samuel, Leslie Sizer, Bruce Worlding, Jane Southward, Katie Hemmings, Gemma Tinkler-Hundal, Emma Taylor, Morag Bottomley, Daniel Chambers, Philip Lawrie, Emma Lopes, Andre Beare, Sandy Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73–88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty–four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05–1.03, P=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss. Nature Publishing Group 2017-10-24 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5672930/ /pubmed/28859058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.294 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Gollins, Simon
West, Nick
Sebag-Montefiore, David
Myint, Arthur Sun
Saunders, Mark
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Quirke, Phil
Essapen, Sharadah
Samuel, Leslie
Sizer, Bruce
Worlding, Jane
Southward, Katie
Hemmings, Gemma
Tinkler-Hundal, Emma
Taylor, Morag
Bottomley, Daniel
Chambers, Philip
Lawrie, Emma
Lopes, Andre
Beare, Sandy
Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title_full Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title_fullStr Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title_short Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations
title_sort preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection ras mutations
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.294
work_keys_str_mv AT gollinssimon preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT westnick preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT sebagmontefioredavid preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT myintarthursun preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT saundersmark preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT susnerwalashabbir preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT quirkephil preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT essapensharadah preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT samuelleslie preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT sizerbruce preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT worldingjane preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT southwardkatie preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT hemmingsgemma preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT tinklerhundalemma preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT taylormorag preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT bottomleydaniel preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT chambersphilip preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT lawrieemma preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT lopesandre preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations
AT bearesandy preoperativechemoradiationwithcapecitabineirinotecanandcetuximabinrectalcancersignificanceofpretreatmentandpostresectionrasmutations