Cargando…

Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S

The purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, bikin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Jessie X., Wen, Ming, Wan, Neng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007
_version_ 1783276573183442944
author Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Wan, Neng
author_facet Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Wan, Neng
author_sort Fan, Jessie X.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5673263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56732632018-01-18 Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S Fan, Jessie X. Wen, Ming Wan, Neng SSM Popul Health Article The purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences. Elsevier 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5673263/ /pubmed/29124104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Wan, Neng
Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title_full Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title_fullStr Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title_full_unstemmed Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title_short Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the U.S
title_sort built environment and active commuting: rural-urban differences in the u.s
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjessiex builtenvironmentandactivecommutingruralurbandifferencesintheus
AT wenming builtenvironmentandactivecommutingruralurbandifferencesintheus
AT wanneng builtenvironmentandactivecommutingruralurbandifferencesintheus