Cargando…

Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect

Background: Mental healthcare needs person-tailored interventions. Experience Sampling Method (ESM) can provide daily life monitoring of personal experiences. This study aims to operationalize and test a measure of momentary reward-related Quality of Life (rQoL). Intuitively, quality of life improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verhagen, Simone J. W., Simons, Claudia J. P., van Zelst, Catherine, Delespaul, Philippe A. E. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01917
_version_ 1783276616394211328
author Verhagen, Simone J. W.
Simons, Claudia J. P.
van Zelst, Catherine
Delespaul, Philippe A. E. G.
author_facet Verhagen, Simone J. W.
Simons, Claudia J. P.
van Zelst, Catherine
Delespaul, Philippe A. E. G.
author_sort Verhagen, Simone J. W.
collection PubMed
description Background: Mental healthcare needs person-tailored interventions. Experience Sampling Method (ESM) can provide daily life monitoring of personal experiences. This study aims to operationalize and test a measure of momentary reward-related Quality of Life (rQoL). Intuitively, quality of life improves by spending more time on rewarding experiences. ESM clinical interventions can use this information to coach patients to find a realistic, optimal balance of positive experiences (maximize reward) in daily life. rQoL combines the frequency of engaging in a relevant context (a ‘behavior setting’) with concurrent (positive) affect. High rQoL occurs when the most frequent behavior settings are combined with positive affect or infrequent behavior settings co-occur with low positive affect. Methods: Resampling procedures (Monte Carlo experiments) were applied to assess the reliability of rQoL using various behavior setting definitions under different sampling circumstances, for real or virtual subjects with low-, average- and high contextual variability. Furthermore, resampling was used to assess whether rQoL is a distinct concept from positive affect. Virtual ESM beep datasets were extracted from 1,058 valid ESM observations for virtual and real subjects. Results: Behavior settings defined by Who-What contextual information were most informative. Simulations of at least 100 ESM observations are needed for reliable assessment. Virtual ESM beep datasets of a real subject can be defined by Who-What-Where behavior setting combinations. Large sample sizes are necessary for reliable rQoL assessments, except for subjects with low contextual variability. rQoL is distinct from positive affect. Conclusion: rQoL is a feasible concept. Monte Carlo experiments should be used to assess the reliable implementation of an ESM statistic. Future research in ESM should asses the behavior of summary statistics under different sampling situations. This exploration is especially relevant in clinical implementation, where often only small datasets are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5673660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56736602017-11-21 Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect Verhagen, Simone J. W. Simons, Claudia J. P. van Zelst, Catherine Delespaul, Philippe A. E. G. Front Psychol Psychology Background: Mental healthcare needs person-tailored interventions. Experience Sampling Method (ESM) can provide daily life monitoring of personal experiences. This study aims to operationalize and test a measure of momentary reward-related Quality of Life (rQoL). Intuitively, quality of life improves by spending more time on rewarding experiences. ESM clinical interventions can use this information to coach patients to find a realistic, optimal balance of positive experiences (maximize reward) in daily life. rQoL combines the frequency of engaging in a relevant context (a ‘behavior setting’) with concurrent (positive) affect. High rQoL occurs when the most frequent behavior settings are combined with positive affect or infrequent behavior settings co-occur with low positive affect. Methods: Resampling procedures (Monte Carlo experiments) were applied to assess the reliability of rQoL using various behavior setting definitions under different sampling circumstances, for real or virtual subjects with low-, average- and high contextual variability. Furthermore, resampling was used to assess whether rQoL is a distinct concept from positive affect. Virtual ESM beep datasets were extracted from 1,058 valid ESM observations for virtual and real subjects. Results: Behavior settings defined by Who-What contextual information were most informative. Simulations of at least 100 ESM observations are needed for reliable assessment. Virtual ESM beep datasets of a real subject can be defined by Who-What-Where behavior setting combinations. Large sample sizes are necessary for reliable rQoL assessments, except for subjects with low contextual variability. rQoL is distinct from positive affect. Conclusion: rQoL is a feasible concept. Monte Carlo experiments should be used to assess the reliable implementation of an ESM statistic. Future research in ESM should asses the behavior of summary statistics under different sampling situations. This exploration is especially relevant in clinical implementation, where often only small datasets are available. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5673660/ /pubmed/29163294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01917 Text en Copyright © 2017 Verhagen, Simons, van Zelst and Delespaul. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Verhagen, Simone J. W.
Simons, Claudia J. P.
van Zelst, Catherine
Delespaul, Philippe A. E. G.
Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title_full Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title_fullStr Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title_full_unstemmed Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title_short Constructing a Reward-Related Quality of Life Statistic in Daily Life—a Proof of Concept Study Using Positive Affect
title_sort constructing a reward-related quality of life statistic in daily life—a proof of concept study using positive affect
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01917
work_keys_str_mv AT verhagensimonejw constructingarewardrelatedqualityoflifestatisticindailylifeaproofofconceptstudyusingpositiveaffect
AT simonsclaudiajp constructingarewardrelatedqualityoflifestatisticindailylifeaproofofconceptstudyusingpositiveaffect
AT vanzelstcatherine constructingarewardrelatedqualityoflifestatisticindailylifeaproofofconceptstudyusingpositiveaffect
AT delespaulphilippeaeg constructingarewardrelatedqualityoflifestatisticindailylifeaproofofconceptstudyusingpositiveaffect