Cargando…

Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what

Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCC-P) demonstrates a reliable pattern of spread to the lymph nodes of the groin. High grade and higher stage (pT1b or greater) SCC-P demonstrate a higher propensity for metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes. Further, lymphadenopathy progresses in a predictable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsamra, Sammy E., Poch, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184779
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.06.05
_version_ 1783276637727490048
author Elsamra, Sammy E.
Poch, Michael A.
author_facet Elsamra, Sammy E.
Poch, Michael A.
author_sort Elsamra, Sammy E.
collection PubMed
description Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCC-P) demonstrates a reliable pattern of spread to the lymph nodes of the groin. High grade and higher stage (pT1b or greater) SCC-P demonstrate a higher propensity for metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes. Further, lymphadenopathy progresses in a predictable fashion, from superficial inguinal lymph nodes to deep inguinal lymph nodes to pelvic lymph nodes, with limited survival noted for those patients with progression to pelvic lymph nodes. Fortunately, inguinal lymphadenectomy can provide cure and improvement in RFS for SCC-P. Unfortunately open inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Perhaps owing to this morbidity, inguinal lymphadenectomy is underperformed in the US. In other words, urologists only offer inguinal lymphadenectomy for high risk SCC-P in only a minority of cases and even when performed, lymph node yield is often unsatisfactory (less than 8 nodes per groin). Recently, a laparoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy has been developed as a new approach to offer potentially curative lymph node resection while minimizing morbidity. The robotic platform has since been adapted for this approach and several reports demonstrate significant improvements in morbidity while maintaining oncologic equivalency. This review highlights the rationale for inguinal lymphadenectomy, inguinal lymph node anatomy, and technical considerations and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5673803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56738032017-11-28 Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what Elsamra, Sammy E. Poch, Michael A. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCC-P) demonstrates a reliable pattern of spread to the lymph nodes of the groin. High grade and higher stage (pT1b or greater) SCC-P demonstrate a higher propensity for metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes. Further, lymphadenopathy progresses in a predictable fashion, from superficial inguinal lymph nodes to deep inguinal lymph nodes to pelvic lymph nodes, with limited survival noted for those patients with progression to pelvic lymph nodes. Fortunately, inguinal lymphadenectomy can provide cure and improvement in RFS for SCC-P. Unfortunately open inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Perhaps owing to this morbidity, inguinal lymphadenectomy is underperformed in the US. In other words, urologists only offer inguinal lymphadenectomy for high risk SCC-P in only a minority of cases and even when performed, lymph node yield is often unsatisfactory (less than 8 nodes per groin). Recently, a laparoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy has been developed as a new approach to offer potentially curative lymph node resection while minimizing morbidity. The robotic platform has since been adapted for this approach and several reports demonstrate significant improvements in morbidity while maintaining oncologic equivalency. This review highlights the rationale for inguinal lymphadenectomy, inguinal lymph node anatomy, and technical considerations and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy. AME Publishing Company 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5673803/ /pubmed/29184779 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.06.05 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Elsamra, Sammy E.
Poch, Michael A.
Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title_full Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title_fullStr Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title_full_unstemmed Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title_short Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
title_sort robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184779
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.06.05
work_keys_str_mv AT elsamrasammye roboticinguinallymphadenectomyforpenilecancerthewhyhowandwhat
AT pochmichaela roboticinguinallymphadenectomyforpenilecancerthewhyhowandwhat