Cargando…
Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast
Multiple invasive foci has been shown to increase the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early breast cancer, but its prognostic implication remains unknown. We aimed to identify the prognostic value of the number of invasive foci in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1175 |
_version_ | 1783276665087983616 |
---|---|
author | He, Xiaofang Ye, Feng Li, Mei Yu, Ping Xiao, Xiangsheng Tang, Hailin Xie, Xiaoming |
author_facet | He, Xiaofang Ye, Feng Li, Mei Yu, Ping Xiao, Xiangsheng Tang, Hailin Xie, Xiaoming |
author_sort | He, Xiaofang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple invasive foci has been shown to increase the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early breast cancer, but its prognostic implication remains unknown. We aimed to identify the prognostic value of the number of invasive foci in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast (DCIS‐MI), and further establish a prognostic invasive lesion index (ILI). A total of 193 patients with DCIS‐MI (the invasive component was up to 10 mm in diameter) were included. Univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression) were used to evaluate the predictive value of the number of invasive foci in LNM. The Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis. More than five invasive foci was an independent predictor for LNM (OR, 2.67, 95% CI, 1.12–6.33, P = 0.026), and associated with significantly shorter disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with no more than five invasive foci (mean DFS 123.8 vs. 148.0 months, P = 0.002; and mean OS 133.5 vs. 151.4 months, P = 0.025). The ILI was established by the sum scores of the number of invasive foci and the invasive component size, having an optimal cut‐off point of 5.5 scores. The high‐ILI group (ILI >5 scores) had a higher incidence of LNM (23.6% vs. 6.9%) and worse prognosis than the low‐ILI group (ILI ≤5 scores). In conclusion, more than five invasive foci was an independent predictor for LNM and an unfavorable prognostic parameter. The ILI could potentially be used to predict survival prognosis in patients with DCIS‐MI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5673919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56739192017-11-15 Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast He, Xiaofang Ye, Feng Li, Mei Yu, Ping Xiao, Xiangsheng Tang, Hailin Xie, Xiaoming Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Multiple invasive foci has been shown to increase the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early breast cancer, but its prognostic implication remains unknown. We aimed to identify the prognostic value of the number of invasive foci in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast (DCIS‐MI), and further establish a prognostic invasive lesion index (ILI). A total of 193 patients with DCIS‐MI (the invasive component was up to 10 mm in diameter) were included. Univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression) were used to evaluate the predictive value of the number of invasive foci in LNM. The Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis. More than five invasive foci was an independent predictor for LNM (OR, 2.67, 95% CI, 1.12–6.33, P = 0.026), and associated with significantly shorter disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with no more than five invasive foci (mean DFS 123.8 vs. 148.0 months, P = 0.002; and mean OS 133.5 vs. 151.4 months, P = 0.025). The ILI was established by the sum scores of the number of invasive foci and the invasive component size, having an optimal cut‐off point of 5.5 scores. The high‐ILI group (ILI >5 scores) had a higher incidence of LNM (23.6% vs. 6.9%) and worse prognosis than the low‐ILI group (ILI ≤5 scores). In conclusion, more than five invasive foci was an independent predictor for LNM and an unfavorable prognostic parameter. The ILI could potentially be used to predict survival prognosis in patients with DCIS‐MI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5673919/ /pubmed/28980458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1175 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research He, Xiaofang Ye, Feng Li, Mei Yu, Ping Xiao, Xiangsheng Tang, Hailin Xie, Xiaoming Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title | Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title_full | Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title_fullStr | Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title_short | Application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
title_sort | application of a novel prognostic invasive lesion index in ductal carcinoma in situ with minimal invasion of the breast |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hexiaofang applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT yefeng applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT limei applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT yuping applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT xiaoxiangsheng applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT tanghailin applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast AT xiexiaoming applicationofanovelprognosticinvasivelesionindexinductalcarcinomainsituwithminimalinvasionofthebreast |