Cargando…

Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia

BACKGROUND: Increasing immunosuppressant consumption and expenditure is a quite a challenge in transplantation medicine. The aim of the study was to characterize the utilization and expenditure of tacrolimus, backbone, and standard of care in immunosuppression regimen in Serbian solid organ transpla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rancic, Nemanja, Vavic, Neven, Obrencevic, Katarina, Pilipovic, Filip, Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00291
_version_ 1783276682992418816
author Rancic, Nemanja
Vavic, Neven
Obrencevic, Katarina
Pilipovic, Filip
Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija
author_facet Rancic, Nemanja
Vavic, Neven
Obrencevic, Katarina
Pilipovic, Filip
Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija
author_sort Rancic, Nemanja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing immunosuppressant consumption and expenditure is a quite a challenge in transplantation medicine. The aim of the study was to characterize the utilization and expenditure of tacrolimus, backbone, and standard of care in immunosuppression regimen in Serbian solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: This study was performed as retrospective cross-sectional study during a 3-year period (from 2013 to 2015) in Serbia. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification/Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) international system was used for consumption evaluation. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were transplanted in Serbia from 2013 to 2015 (185 recipients from deceased donors and 84 recipients from living donors). Total number of deceased donors in this period was 81. The consumption of tacrolimus increased (from 0.051 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day to 0.069 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2013 and 2015, respectively). The total cost of tacrolimus was also increased; from 1,206,816€ to 1,483,472€ in 2013 and 2015, respectively. On the other hand, the number of all new solid organ transplants (from deceased and living donors) per million population per year was decreased from 17.39 to 10.02, from 2013 to 2015, respectively. CONCLUSION: In spite downward trend in the number of solid organ transplants, tacrolimus consumption and expenditure in the examined 3-year period in Serbia increased. Since tacrolimus is a high-cost and life-preserving drug, its increasing utilization and expenditure will most likely continue consuming an enhancing share of Serbian pharmaceutical expenditure, as well as its health care, as a whole.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5673994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56739942017-11-21 Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia Rancic, Nemanja Vavic, Neven Obrencevic, Katarina Pilipovic, Filip Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Increasing immunosuppressant consumption and expenditure is a quite a challenge in transplantation medicine. The aim of the study was to characterize the utilization and expenditure of tacrolimus, backbone, and standard of care in immunosuppression regimen in Serbian solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: This study was performed as retrospective cross-sectional study during a 3-year period (from 2013 to 2015) in Serbia. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification/Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) international system was used for consumption evaluation. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were transplanted in Serbia from 2013 to 2015 (185 recipients from deceased donors and 84 recipients from living donors). Total number of deceased donors in this period was 81. The consumption of tacrolimus increased (from 0.051 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day to 0.069 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2013 and 2015, respectively). The total cost of tacrolimus was also increased; from 1,206,816€ to 1,483,472€ in 2013 and 2015, respectively. On the other hand, the number of all new solid organ transplants (from deceased and living donors) per million population per year was decreased from 17.39 to 10.02, from 2013 to 2015, respectively. CONCLUSION: In spite downward trend in the number of solid organ transplants, tacrolimus consumption and expenditure in the examined 3-year period in Serbia increased. Since tacrolimus is a high-cost and life-preserving drug, its increasing utilization and expenditure will most likely continue consuming an enhancing share of Serbian pharmaceutical expenditure, as well as its health care, as a whole. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5673994/ /pubmed/29164097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00291 Text en Copyright © 2017 Rancic, Vavic, Obrencevic, Pilipovic and Dragojevic-Simic. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Rancic, Nemanja
Vavic, Neven
Obrencevic, Katarina
Pilipovic, Filip
Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija
Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title_full Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title_fullStr Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title_short Tacrolimus Utilization and Expenditure in Serbia
title_sort tacrolimus utilization and expenditure in serbia
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00291
work_keys_str_mv AT rancicnemanja tacrolimusutilizationandexpenditureinserbia
AT vavicneven tacrolimusutilizationandexpenditureinserbia
AT obrencevickatarina tacrolimusutilizationandexpenditureinserbia
AT pilipovicfilip tacrolimusutilizationandexpenditureinserbia
AT dragojevicsimicviktorija tacrolimusutilizationandexpenditureinserbia