Cargando…

Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy

Airway management is essential for safe anesthesia and endotracheal intubation is the most important procedure by which critically ill patients can be better managed, especially if done quickly and successfully. This study aimed to compare the techniques of intubation through laryngeal mask airway (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modir, Hesameddin, Moshiri, Esmail, Malekianzadeh, Bita, Noori, Gholamreza, Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152207
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.215744
_version_ 1783276818205245440
author Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Malekianzadeh, Bita
Noori, Gholamreza
Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl
author_facet Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Malekianzadeh, Bita
Noori, Gholamreza
Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl
author_sort Modir, Hesameddin
collection PubMed
description Airway management is essential for safe anesthesia and endotracheal intubation is the most important procedure by which critically ill patients can be better managed, especially if done quickly and successfully. This study aimed to compare the techniques of intubation through laryngeal mask airway (LMA) using a bougie versus video laryngoscopy (VL) regarding to intubation success and the quality of intubation indices in patients with difficult airways. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 96 patients aged 16–76 years with Mallampati class 3 or 4 who underwent elective surgery. Once the demographics were recorded, patients were randomly divided into two groups and the first group intubated with VL, and the second group intubated through laryngeal mask using a bougie. Then vital signs, arterial oxygen saturation, the time required for successful intubation, and ease of intubation were recorded. Here t-tests, chi-square, Fisher exact tests, and analysis of variance for repeated measurement were used to analyze the data in SPSS software. The overall success rates of intubation in VL and LMA groups were 46 (96%) and 44 (92%), respectively. The mean duration of intubation for the LMA and VL groups was 18.70 ± 6.73 and 14.21 ± 4.14 seconds, respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, visual analogue scale score for pain in throat was significantly lower in VL group than LMA (1.65 ± 0.76 vs. 1.33 ± 0.52). Moreover, easy intubation in bougie group was 50%, while the easy intubation in VL was 73% (P = 0.023). In addition, incidence of cough was 31% in the LMA with bougie group and 9% in VL group (P = 0.005). The VL technique is an easier method and has a shorter intubation time than LMA using bougie, and causes a lower incidence of coughing, laryngospasm in patients that need intubation. Moreover, cough and discomfort in the throat tend to be less in VL, and the LMA could be used as replacement of VL in hard situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5674652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56746522017-11-17 Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy Modir, Hesameddin Moshiri, Esmail Malekianzadeh, Bita Noori, Gholamreza Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl Med Gas Res Research Article Airway management is essential for safe anesthesia and endotracheal intubation is the most important procedure by which critically ill patients can be better managed, especially if done quickly and successfully. This study aimed to compare the techniques of intubation through laryngeal mask airway (LMA) using a bougie versus video laryngoscopy (VL) regarding to intubation success and the quality of intubation indices in patients with difficult airways. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 96 patients aged 16–76 years with Mallampati class 3 or 4 who underwent elective surgery. Once the demographics were recorded, patients were randomly divided into two groups and the first group intubated with VL, and the second group intubated through laryngeal mask using a bougie. Then vital signs, arterial oxygen saturation, the time required for successful intubation, and ease of intubation were recorded. Here t-tests, chi-square, Fisher exact tests, and analysis of variance for repeated measurement were used to analyze the data in SPSS software. The overall success rates of intubation in VL and LMA groups were 46 (96%) and 44 (92%), respectively. The mean duration of intubation for the LMA and VL groups was 18.70 ± 6.73 and 14.21 ± 4.14 seconds, respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, visual analogue scale score for pain in throat was significantly lower in VL group than LMA (1.65 ± 0.76 vs. 1.33 ± 0.52). Moreover, easy intubation in bougie group was 50%, while the easy intubation in VL was 73% (P = 0.023). In addition, incidence of cough was 31% in the LMA with bougie group and 9% in VL group (P = 0.005). The VL technique is an easier method and has a shorter intubation time than LMA using bougie, and causes a lower incidence of coughing, laryngospasm in patients that need intubation. Moreover, cough and discomfort in the throat tend to be less in VL, and the LMA could be used as replacement of VL in hard situations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5674652/ /pubmed/29152207 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.215744 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medical Gas Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Malekianzadeh, Bita
Noori, Gholamreza
Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazl
Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title_full Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title_fullStr Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title_short Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
title_sort endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152207
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.215744
work_keys_str_mv AT modirhesameddin endotrachealintubationinpatientswithdifficultairwayusinglaryngealmaskairwaywithbougieversusvideolaryngoscopy
AT moshiriesmail endotrachealintubationinpatientswithdifficultairwayusinglaryngealmaskairwaywithbougieversusvideolaryngoscopy
AT malekianzadehbita endotrachealintubationinpatientswithdifficultairwayusinglaryngealmaskairwaywithbougieversusvideolaryngoscopy
AT noorigholamreza endotrachealintubationinpatientswithdifficultairwayusinglaryngealmaskairwaywithbougieversusvideolaryngoscopy
AT mohammadbeigiabolfazl endotrachealintubationinpatientswithdifficultairwayusinglaryngealmaskairwaywithbougieversusvideolaryngoscopy