Cargando…

In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis

BACKGROUND: Indications for use of tolvaptan in SIADH-associated hyponatraemia remain controversial. We audited our local guidelines for Tolvaptan use in this situation to review treatment implications including drug safety, hospital admission episode analysis (episodes of liver toxicity, CNS myelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Humayun, Malik Asif, Cranston, Iain C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0214-2
_version_ 1783276861967564800
author Humayun, Malik Asif
Cranston, Iain C.
author_facet Humayun, Malik Asif
Cranston, Iain C.
author_sort Humayun, Malik Asif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indications for use of tolvaptan in SIADH-associated hyponatraemia remain controversial. We audited our local guidelines for Tolvaptan use in this situation to review treatment implications including drug safety, hospital admission episode analysis (episodes of liver toxicity, CNS myelinolysis, sodium-related re-admission rates), morbidity; mortality and underlying aetiologies. METHODS: We report a retrospective case series analysis of on-going treatment outcomes (case-note review) for 31 patients (age 73.3 ± 10.5 years, 55% females) consecutively treated with Tolvaptan as in-patient for confirmed SIADH with persistent S/Na(+) < 125 mmol/L despite removal of reversible causes and 24-48 h fluid restriction, and include longer-term outcome data (re-treatment/readmissions/mortality) for up to 4 years of follow-up. A minimum of 6 months follow-up data were reviewed unless the patient died before that period. RESULTS: Short-term outcomes were favourable; 94%-achieved treatment targets after a mean of 3.48 ± 2.46 days. There was statistically significant rise in S/Na(+) level after Tolvaptan treatment (before treatment: mean sodium 117.8 ± 3.73, 108–121 mmol/L and after treatment: mean sodium 128.7 ± 3.67, 125–135.2 mmol/L, P < .001). Although the target S/Na(+) level was >125 mmol/L in fact one third (35%) of the patients achieved a S/Na(+) level of >130 mmol/L by the time of hospital discharge. No patient experienced S/Na(+) rise >12 mmol/L/24 h, drug-associated liver injury or CNS-myelinolysis. The average length of hospital stay following start of Tolvaptan treatment was 3.2 days. Relapse of hyponatraemia occurred in 26% of the patients, requiring retreatment with Tolvaptan. In all patients where either relapse of hyponatraemia occurred or readmission was necessary, SIADH was associated with malignancy, which was present overall in 60% of the group studied. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of Tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH-related significant, symptomatic hyponatraemia when used under specialist guidance and strict monitoring. A sodium level relapsing below the treatment threshold by 1 week after discontinuation is a good indicator of a patient group with re-treatment/longer-term therapy needs, all of whom had underlying malignancy. The criteria set locally in our trust to initiate Tolvaptan use also identifies a group where further investigation for underlying malignancy should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5674865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56748652017-11-15 In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis Humayun, Malik Asif Cranston, Iain C. BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Indications for use of tolvaptan in SIADH-associated hyponatraemia remain controversial. We audited our local guidelines for Tolvaptan use in this situation to review treatment implications including drug safety, hospital admission episode analysis (episodes of liver toxicity, CNS myelinolysis, sodium-related re-admission rates), morbidity; mortality and underlying aetiologies. METHODS: We report a retrospective case series analysis of on-going treatment outcomes (case-note review) for 31 patients (age 73.3 ± 10.5 years, 55% females) consecutively treated with Tolvaptan as in-patient for confirmed SIADH with persistent S/Na(+) < 125 mmol/L despite removal of reversible causes and 24-48 h fluid restriction, and include longer-term outcome data (re-treatment/readmissions/mortality) for up to 4 years of follow-up. A minimum of 6 months follow-up data were reviewed unless the patient died before that period. RESULTS: Short-term outcomes were favourable; 94%-achieved treatment targets after a mean of 3.48 ± 2.46 days. There was statistically significant rise in S/Na(+) level after Tolvaptan treatment (before treatment: mean sodium 117.8 ± 3.73, 108–121 mmol/L and after treatment: mean sodium 128.7 ± 3.67, 125–135.2 mmol/L, P < .001). Although the target S/Na(+) level was >125 mmol/L in fact one third (35%) of the patients achieved a S/Na(+) level of >130 mmol/L by the time of hospital discharge. No patient experienced S/Na(+) rise >12 mmol/L/24 h, drug-associated liver injury or CNS-myelinolysis. The average length of hospital stay following start of Tolvaptan treatment was 3.2 days. Relapse of hyponatraemia occurred in 26% of the patients, requiring retreatment with Tolvaptan. In all patients where either relapse of hyponatraemia occurred or readmission was necessary, SIADH was associated with malignancy, which was present overall in 60% of the group studied. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of Tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH-related significant, symptomatic hyponatraemia when used under specialist guidance and strict monitoring. A sodium level relapsing below the treatment threshold by 1 week after discontinuation is a good indicator of a patient group with re-treatment/longer-term therapy needs, all of whom had underlying malignancy. The criteria set locally in our trust to initiate Tolvaptan use also identifies a group where further investigation for underlying malignancy should be considered. BioMed Central 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5674865/ /pubmed/29110656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0214-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Humayun, Malik Asif
Cranston, Iain C.
In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title_full In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title_fullStr In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title_full_unstemmed In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title_short In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
title_sort in-patient tolvaptan use in siadh: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0214-2
work_keys_str_mv AT humayunmalikasif inpatienttolvaptanuseinsiadhcareaudittherapyobservationandoutcomeanalysis
AT cranstoniainc inpatienttolvaptanuseinsiadhcareaudittherapyobservationandoutcomeanalysis