A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study

In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Laura, Schultze, Anna, Simpson, Alex, Graham, Sophie, Wasiak, Radek, Ramagopalan, Sreeram V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2017
Materias:
Research Note
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167735
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2
_version_ 1783277023368577024
author McDonald, Laura
Schultze, Anna
Simpson, Alex
Graham, Sophie
Wasiak, Radek
Ramagopalan, Sreeram V.
author_facet McDonald, Laura
Schultze, Anna
Simpson, Alex
Graham, Sophie
Wasiak, Radek
Ramagopalan, Sreeram V.
author_sort McDonald, Laura
collection PubMed
description In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5676190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56761902017-11-21 A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study McDonald, Laura Schultze, Anna Simpson, Alex Graham, Sophie Wasiak, Radek Ramagopalan, Sreeram V. F1000Res Research Note In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists. F1000 Research Limited 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5676190/ /pubmed/29167735 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2 Text en Copyright: © 2017 McDonald L et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Note
McDonald, Laura
Schultze, Anna
Simpson, Alex
Graham, Sophie
Wasiak, Radek
Ramagopalan, Sreeram V.
A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title_full A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title_short A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
title_sort review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the bmj: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167735
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldlaura areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT schultzeanna areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT simpsonalex areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT grahamsophie areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT wasiakradek areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT ramagopalansreeramv areviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT mcdonaldlaura reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT schultzeanna reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT simpsonalex reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT grahamsophie reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT wasiakradek reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy
AT ramagopalansreeramv reviewofdatasharingstatementsinobservationalstudiespublishedinthebmjacrosssectionalstudy

Ejemplares similares