Cargando…

Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success

BACKGROUND: Prior to 2007, we taught the abdominal examination in a hospital based group to 40 students, at one hospital. We used volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, and required faculty development sessions. In 2007, our medical school changed its “Introduction to Physical Examination” se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Helen M, Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen Q, Flier, Sarah N, Vaughn, Byron P, Tukey, Melissa H, Pelletier, Stephen R, Horst, Douglas A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138611
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146500
_version_ 1783277114078789632
author Shields, Helen M
Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen Q
Flier, Sarah N
Vaughn, Byron P
Tukey, Melissa H
Pelletier, Stephen R
Horst, Douglas A
author_facet Shields, Helen M
Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen Q
Flier, Sarah N
Vaughn, Byron P
Tukey, Melissa H
Pelletier, Stephen R
Horst, Douglas A
author_sort Shields, Helen M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior to 2007, we taught the abdominal examination in a hospital based group to 40 students, at one hospital. We used volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, and required faculty development sessions. In 2007, our medical school changed its “Introduction to Physical Examination” session so that the entire class was to be taught in a geographically central session. Our hospital was selected to lead the abdominal examination portion of the session. AIM: Our aim was to answer three questions. First, could we quadruple the recruitment of volunteer patients, and faculty? Second, was it volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, or faculty training that was most valued by the students? Third, would volunteer patients and/or faculty agree to participate a second time? METHODS: A total of 43–46 patients and 43–46 faculty were recruited and 43–46 examining rooms were obtained for each of the 5 years of this study. Teachers were required to attend a 1-hour faculty development session. The class of about 170 students was divided into 43–46 groups each year. The teacher demonstrated the abdominal examination and each student practiced the examination on another student. Each student then repeated the full abdominal examination on a volunteer patient. RESULTS: Over the 5-year time period (2008–2012), the abdominal examination ranked first among all organ systems’ “Introductory Sessions”. The abdominal examination ratings had the best mean score (1.35) on a Likert scale where 1 is excellent and 5 is poor. The students gave the most positive spontaneous comments to having volunteer patients, with small groups coming in as the second most appreciated educational element. CONCLUSION: We successfully quadrupled the number of faculty, patients, and examining rooms and created a highly rated educational program as measured by anonymous student evaluations, patient and faculty participation, and the medical school’s selecting the abdominal examination methods as an “Advanced Examination” for the Pathways Curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5676735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56767352017-11-14 Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success Shields, Helen M Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen Q Flier, Sarah N Vaughn, Byron P Tukey, Melissa H Pelletier, Stephen R Horst, Douglas A Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Prior to 2007, we taught the abdominal examination in a hospital based group to 40 students, at one hospital. We used volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, and required faculty development sessions. In 2007, our medical school changed its “Introduction to Physical Examination” session so that the entire class was to be taught in a geographically central session. Our hospital was selected to lead the abdominal examination portion of the session. AIM: Our aim was to answer three questions. First, could we quadruple the recruitment of volunteer patients, and faculty? Second, was it volunteer patients, small groups, repetition, or faculty training that was most valued by the students? Third, would volunteer patients and/or faculty agree to participate a second time? METHODS: A total of 43–46 patients and 43–46 faculty were recruited and 43–46 examining rooms were obtained for each of the 5 years of this study. Teachers were required to attend a 1-hour faculty development session. The class of about 170 students was divided into 43–46 groups each year. The teacher demonstrated the abdominal examination and each student practiced the examination on another student. Each student then repeated the full abdominal examination on a volunteer patient. RESULTS: Over the 5-year time period (2008–2012), the abdominal examination ranked first among all organ systems’ “Introductory Sessions”. The abdominal examination ratings had the best mean score (1.35) on a Likert scale where 1 is excellent and 5 is poor. The students gave the most positive spontaneous comments to having volunteer patients, with small groups coming in as the second most appreciated educational element. CONCLUSION: We successfully quadrupled the number of faculty, patients, and examining rooms and created a highly rated educational program as measured by anonymous student evaluations, patient and faculty participation, and the medical school’s selecting the abdominal examination methods as an “Advanced Examination” for the Pathways Curriculum. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5676735/ /pubmed/29138611 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146500 Text en © 2017 Shields et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shields, Helen M
Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen Q
Flier, Sarah N
Vaughn, Byron P
Tukey, Melissa H
Pelletier, Stephen R
Horst, Douglas A
Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title_full Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title_fullStr Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title_full_unstemmed Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title_short Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
title_sort volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination’s success
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138611
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146500
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldshelenm volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT fernandezbeckernielsenq volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT fliersarahn volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT vaughnbyronp volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT tukeymelissah volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT pelletierstephenr volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess
AT horstdouglasa volunteerpatientsandsmallgroupscontributetoabdominalexaminationssuccess