Cargando…

Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways, also known as fast-track protocols, have been adopted since the early 2000s by various surgical specialties with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost burden of major surgery on the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maloney, Ian, Parker, Daniel C., Cookson, Michael S., Patel, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170136
_version_ 1783277121171357696
author Maloney, Ian
Parker, Daniel C.
Cookson, Michael S.
Patel, Sanjay
author_facet Maloney, Ian
Parker, Daniel C.
Cookson, Michael S.
Patel, Sanjay
author_sort Maloney, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways, also known as fast-track protocols, have been adopted since the early 2000s by various surgical specialties with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost burden of major surgery on the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on the origin of enhanced recovery pathways, track the contemporary utilization of such practices for patients undergoing radical cystectomy, and analyze the available data regarding their effect on morbidity, mortality, and treatment cost. METHODS: A literature search of multiple electronic databases was undertaken. Manuscripts including patients undergoing radical cystectomy were chosen based on predefined criteria with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Strength of evidence for each study that met inclusion criteria was assessed based on the risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision. RESULTS: Database searches resulted in 1,236 potentially relevant articles. A total of 485 articles were selected for full-text dual review and 106 studies in 52 publications met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: The utilization of enhanced recovery pathways with the goal of improving overall patient morbidity and mortality is well supported in the literature, however standardization of implementation and adherence across institutions is lacking, and their direct efficacy on reducing preventable treatment related expenditures is unconfirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5676765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56767652017-11-16 Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review Maloney, Ian Parker, Daniel C. Cookson, Michael S. Patel, Sanjay Bladder Cancer Research Report BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways, also known as fast-track protocols, have been adopted since the early 2000s by various surgical specialties with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost burden of major surgery on the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on the origin of enhanced recovery pathways, track the contemporary utilization of such practices for patients undergoing radical cystectomy, and analyze the available data regarding their effect on morbidity, mortality, and treatment cost. METHODS: A literature search of multiple electronic databases was undertaken. Manuscripts including patients undergoing radical cystectomy were chosen based on predefined criteria with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Strength of evidence for each study that met inclusion criteria was assessed based on the risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision. RESULTS: Database searches resulted in 1,236 potentially relevant articles. A total of 485 articles were selected for full-text dual review and 106 studies in 52 publications met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: The utilization of enhanced recovery pathways with the goal of improving overall patient morbidity and mortality is well supported in the literature, however standardization of implementation and adherence across institutions is lacking, and their direct efficacy on reducing preventable treatment related expenditures is unconfirmed. IOS Press 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5676765/ /pubmed/29152551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170136 Text en © 2017 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Report
Maloney, Ian
Parker, Daniel C.
Cookson, Michael S.
Patel, Sanjay
Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title_full Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title_short Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review
title_sort bladder cancer recovery pathways: a systematic review
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170136
work_keys_str_mv AT maloneyian bladdercancerrecoverypathwaysasystematicreview
AT parkerdanielc bladdercancerrecoverypathwaysasystematicreview
AT cooksonmichaels bladdercancerrecoverypathwaysasystematicreview
AT patelsanjay bladdercancerrecoverypathwaysasystematicreview