Cargando…

Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study

Background: Sleep quality in hospitalized medicine patients is poor, with environmental factors among the most frequently cited reasons. Objective: We tested the efficacy of a non-pharmacologic intervention on the sleep quality of medicine inpatients. Design/Methods: A controlled study to evaluate o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobing, Selina, Dey, Anita, McAlister, Finlay, Ringrose, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1379845
_version_ 1783277128526069760
author Dobing, Selina
Dey, Anita
McAlister, Finlay
Ringrose, Jennifer
author_facet Dobing, Selina
Dey, Anita
McAlister, Finlay
Ringrose, Jennifer
author_sort Dobing, Selina
collection PubMed
description Background: Sleep quality in hospitalized medicine patients is poor, with environmental factors among the most frequently cited reasons. Objective: We tested the efficacy of a non-pharmacologic intervention on the sleep quality of medicine inpatients. Design/Methods: A controlled study to evaluate our non-pharmacologic multidisciplinary ‘TUCK-in’ protocol (which includes timed lights-off periods, minimizing night-time noise, distribution of earplugs at bedtime, cued toileting before bedtime, and identification and reduction of modifiable interruptions) was deployed on two of five identical medicine wards. Randomization was at the level of the ward. The main outcome measure was self-reported duration of night-time sleep within 48 hours prior to discharge. Additional outcome measures included the Verran–Snyder-Halpern (VSH) Sleep Score and inpatient sleep pharmaceutical use. Results: Self-reported duration of night-time sleep (median 5.0 vs. 5.0 hours, p = 0.29) and daytime sleep (1.0 versus 0.5 hours, p = 0.43) did not differ between the 40 intervention patients and the 41 control patients (p = 0.13 on multivariate analysis). Cumulative VSH sleep disturbance (median 420 versus 359, p = 0.19), efficacy (median 169 versus 192, p = 0.29), or supplementation (median 97 versus 100, p = 0.51) scales were also not different between study arms. Conclusions: Although staff reported the protocol to be achievable and worthwhile, there were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between intervention and control patients.​
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5676797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56767972017-11-16 Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study Dobing, Selina Dey, Anita McAlister, Finlay Ringrose, Jennifer J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Research Articles Background: Sleep quality in hospitalized medicine patients is poor, with environmental factors among the most frequently cited reasons. Objective: We tested the efficacy of a non-pharmacologic intervention on the sleep quality of medicine inpatients. Design/Methods: A controlled study to evaluate our non-pharmacologic multidisciplinary ‘TUCK-in’ protocol (which includes timed lights-off periods, minimizing night-time noise, distribution of earplugs at bedtime, cued toileting before bedtime, and identification and reduction of modifiable interruptions) was deployed on two of five identical medicine wards. Randomization was at the level of the ward. The main outcome measure was self-reported duration of night-time sleep within 48 hours prior to discharge. Additional outcome measures included the Verran–Snyder-Halpern (VSH) Sleep Score and inpatient sleep pharmaceutical use. Results: Self-reported duration of night-time sleep (median 5.0 vs. 5.0 hours, p = 0.29) and daytime sleep (1.0 versus 0.5 hours, p = 0.43) did not differ between the 40 intervention patients and the 41 control patients (p = 0.13 on multivariate analysis). Cumulative VSH sleep disturbance (median 420 versus 359, p = 0.19), efficacy (median 169 versus 192, p = 0.29), or supplementation (median 97 versus 100, p = 0.51) scales were also not different between study arms. Conclusions: Although staff reported the protocol to be achievable and worthwhile, there were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between intervention and control patients.​ Taylor & Francis 2017-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5676797/ /pubmed/29147469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1379845 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Dobing, Selina
Dey, Anita
McAlister, Finlay
Ringrose, Jennifer
Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title_full Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title_fullStr Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title_short Non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
title_sort non-pharmacologic interventions to improve sleep of medicine inpatients: a controlled study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1379845
work_keys_str_mv AT dobingselina nonpharmacologicinterventionstoimprovesleepofmedicineinpatientsacontrolledstudy
AT deyanita nonpharmacologicinterventionstoimprovesleepofmedicineinpatientsacontrolledstudy
AT mcalisterfinlay nonpharmacologicinterventionstoimprovesleepofmedicineinpatientsacontrolledstudy
AT ringrosejennifer nonpharmacologicinterventionstoimprovesleepofmedicineinpatientsacontrolledstudy