Cargando…

Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been proposed as a method to improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. However, there is concern over a possible increase in the risk of positive surgical margins and prostate can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellangino, Mariangela, Verrill, Clare, Leslie, Tom, Bell, Richard W., Hamdy, Freddie C., Lamb, Alastair D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0
_version_ 1783277129241198592
author Bellangino, Mariangela
Verrill, Clare
Leslie, Tom
Bell, Richard W.
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Lamb, Alastair D.
author_facet Bellangino, Mariangela
Verrill, Clare
Leslie, Tom
Bell, Richard W.
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Lamb, Alastair D.
author_sort Bellangino, Mariangela
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been proposed as a method to improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. However, there is concern over a possible increase in the risk of positive surgical margins and prostate cancer recurrence rate. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported improved early recovery and overall long-term urinary continence without compromising oncologic control. The aim of our study was to perform a critical review of the literature to assess the impact on bladder neck and base margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We carried out a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane library databases in May 2017 using medical subject headings and free-text protocol according to PRISMA guidelines. We used the following search terms: bladder neck preservation, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy and surgical margins. Studies focusing on positive surgical margins (PSM) in bladder neck sparing RP pertinent to the objective of this review were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, we found 15 relevant studies reporting overall and site-specific positive surgical margins rate after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. This included two RCTs, seven prospective comparative studies, two retrospective comparative studies and four case series. All studies were published between 1993 and 2015 with sample sizes ranging between 50 and 1067. Surgical approaches included open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The overall and base-specific PSM rates ranged between 7–36% and 0–16.3%, respectively. Mean base PSM was 4.9% in those patients where bladder neck sparing was performed, but only 1.85% in those without sparing. SUMMARY: Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy may increase base-positive margins. Further studies are needed to better investigate the impact of this technique on oncological outcomes. A future paradigm could include modification of intended approach to bladder neck dissection when anterior base lesions are identified on pre-operative MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5676800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56768002017-12-04 Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Bellangino, Mariangela Verrill, Clare Leslie, Tom Bell, Richard W. Hamdy, Freddie C. Lamb, Alastair D. Curr Urol Rep Urosurgery (P Sooriakumaran, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been proposed as a method to improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. However, there is concern over a possible increase in the risk of positive surgical margins and prostate cancer recurrence rate. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported improved early recovery and overall long-term urinary continence without compromising oncologic control. The aim of our study was to perform a critical review of the literature to assess the impact on bladder neck and base margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We carried out a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane library databases in May 2017 using medical subject headings and free-text protocol according to PRISMA guidelines. We used the following search terms: bladder neck preservation, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy and surgical margins. Studies focusing on positive surgical margins (PSM) in bladder neck sparing RP pertinent to the objective of this review were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, we found 15 relevant studies reporting overall and site-specific positive surgical margins rate after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. This included two RCTs, seven prospective comparative studies, two retrospective comparative studies and four case series. All studies were published between 1993 and 2015 with sample sizes ranging between 50 and 1067. Surgical approaches included open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The overall and base-specific PSM rates ranged between 7–36% and 0–16.3%, respectively. Mean base PSM was 4.9% in those patients where bladder neck sparing was performed, but only 1.85% in those without sparing. SUMMARY: Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy may increase base-positive margins. Further studies are needed to better investigate the impact of this technique on oncological outcomes. A future paradigm could include modification of intended approach to bladder neck dissection when anterior base lesions are identified on pre-operative MRI. Springer US 2017-11-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5676800/ /pubmed/29116405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Urosurgery (P Sooriakumaran, Section Editor)
Bellangino, Mariangela
Verrill, Clare
Leslie, Tom
Bell, Richard W.
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Lamb, Alastair D.
Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title_full Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title_short Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort systematic review of studies reporting positive surgical margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy
topic Urosurgery (P Sooriakumaran, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bellanginomariangela systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy
AT verrillclare systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy
AT leslietom systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy
AT bellrichardw systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy
AT hamdyfreddiec systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy
AT lambalastaird systematicreviewofstudiesreportingpositivesurgicalmarginsafterbladdernecksparingradicalprostatectomy