Cargando…

Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality

The evaluation of the effects of air pollution on public health and human-wellbeing requires reliable data. Standard air quality monitoring stations provide accurate measurements of airborne pollutant levels, but, due to their sparse distribution, they cannot capture accurately the spatial variabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Broday, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102263
_version_ 1783277223133839360
author Broday, David M.
author_facet Broday, David M.
author_sort Broday, David M.
collection PubMed
description The evaluation of the effects of air pollution on public health and human-wellbeing requires reliable data. Standard air quality monitoring stations provide accurate measurements of airborne pollutant levels, but, due to their sparse distribution, they cannot capture accurately the spatial variability of air pollutant concentrations within cities. Dedicated in-depth field campaigns have dense spatial coverage of the measurements but are held for relatively short time periods. Hence, their representativeness is limited. Moreover, the oftentimes integrated measurements represent time-averaged records. Recent advances in communication and sensor technologies enable the deployment of dense grids of Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for air quality monitoring, yet their capability to capture urban-scale spatiotemporal pollutant patterns has not been thoroughly examined to date. Here, we summarize our studies on the practicalities of using data streams from sensor nodes for air quality measurement and the required methods to tune the results to different stakeholders and applications. We summarize the results from eight cities across Europe, five sensor technologies-three stationary (with one tested also while moving) and two personal sensor platforms, and eight ambient pollutants. Overall, few sensors showed an exceptional and consistent performance, which can shed light on the fine spatiotemporal urban variability of pollutant concentrations. Stationary sensor nodes were more reliable than personal nodes. In general, the sensor measurements tend to suffer from the interference of various environmental factors and require frequent calibrations. This calls for the development of suitable field calibration procedures, and several such in situ field calibrations are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5677343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56773432017-11-17 Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality Broday, David M. Sensors (Basel) Article The evaluation of the effects of air pollution on public health and human-wellbeing requires reliable data. Standard air quality monitoring stations provide accurate measurements of airborne pollutant levels, but, due to their sparse distribution, they cannot capture accurately the spatial variability of air pollutant concentrations within cities. Dedicated in-depth field campaigns have dense spatial coverage of the measurements but are held for relatively short time periods. Hence, their representativeness is limited. Moreover, the oftentimes integrated measurements represent time-averaged records. Recent advances in communication and sensor technologies enable the deployment of dense grids of Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for air quality monitoring, yet their capability to capture urban-scale spatiotemporal pollutant patterns has not been thoroughly examined to date. Here, we summarize our studies on the practicalities of using data streams from sensor nodes for air quality measurement and the required methods to tune the results to different stakeholders and applications. We summarize the results from eight cities across Europe, five sensor technologies-three stationary (with one tested also while moving) and two personal sensor platforms, and eight ambient pollutants. Overall, few sensors showed an exceptional and consistent performance, which can shed light on the fine spatiotemporal urban variability of pollutant concentrations. Stationary sensor nodes were more reliable than personal nodes. In general, the sensor measurements tend to suffer from the interference of various environmental factors and require frequent calibrations. This calls for the development of suitable field calibration procedures, and several such in situ field calibrations are presented. MDPI 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5677343/ /pubmed/28974042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102263 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Broday, David M.
Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title_full Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title_fullStr Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title_full_unstemmed Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title_short Wireless Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Measurement—The Promise and the Current Reality
title_sort wireless distributed environmental sensor networks for air pollution measurement—the promise and the current reality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102263
work_keys_str_mv AT brodaydavidm wirelessdistributedenvironmentalsensornetworksforairpollutionmeasurementthepromiseandthecurrentreality
AT wirelessdistributedenvironmentalsensornetworksforairpollutionmeasurementthepromiseandthecurrentreality