Cargando…

Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR

In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brede, Benjamin, Lau, Alvaro, Bartholomeus, Harm M., Kooistra, Lammert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29039755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102371
_version_ 1783277236658372608
author Brede, Benjamin
Lau, Alvaro
Bartholomeus, Harm M.
Kooistra, Lammert
author_facet Brede, Benjamin
Lau, Alvaro
Bartholomeus, Harm M.
Kooistra, Lammert
author_sort Brede, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and produces relatively low point density, while TLS is labour intense and time demanding. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne laser scanning can be the way in between. In this study, we present first results and experiences with the RIEGL RiCOPTER with VUX [Formula: see text]-1UAV ALS system and compare it with the well tested RIEGL VZ-400 TLS system. We scanned the same forest plots with both systems over the course of two days. We derived Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and finally Canopy Height Models (CHMs) from the resulting point clouds. ALS CHMs were on average 11.5 [Formula: see text] higher in five plots with different canopy conditions. This showed that TLS could not always detect the top of canopy. Moreover, we extracted trunk segments of 58 trees for ALS and TLS simultaneously, of which 39 could be used to model Diameter at Breast Height (DBH). ALS DBH showed a high agreement with TLS DBH with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and root mean square error of 4.24 [Formula: see text]. We conclude that RiCOPTER has the potential to perform comparable to TLS for estimating forest canopy height and DBH under the studied forest conditions. Further research should be directed to testing UAV-borne LiDAR for explicit 3D modelling of whole trees to estimate tree volume and subsequently Above-Ground Biomass (AGB).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5677400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56774002017-11-17 Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR Brede, Benjamin Lau, Alvaro Bartholomeus, Harm M. Kooistra, Lammert Sensors (Basel) Article In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and produces relatively low point density, while TLS is labour intense and time demanding. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne laser scanning can be the way in between. In this study, we present first results and experiences with the RIEGL RiCOPTER with VUX [Formula: see text]-1UAV ALS system and compare it with the well tested RIEGL VZ-400 TLS system. We scanned the same forest plots with both systems over the course of two days. We derived Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and finally Canopy Height Models (CHMs) from the resulting point clouds. ALS CHMs were on average 11.5 [Formula: see text] higher in five plots with different canopy conditions. This showed that TLS could not always detect the top of canopy. Moreover, we extracted trunk segments of 58 trees for ALS and TLS simultaneously, of which 39 could be used to model Diameter at Breast Height (DBH). ALS DBH showed a high agreement with TLS DBH with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and root mean square error of 4.24 [Formula: see text]. We conclude that RiCOPTER has the potential to perform comparable to TLS for estimating forest canopy height and DBH under the studied forest conditions. Further research should be directed to testing UAV-borne LiDAR for explicit 3D modelling of whole trees to estimate tree volume and subsequently Above-Ground Biomass (AGB). MDPI 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5677400/ /pubmed/29039755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102371 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brede, Benjamin
Lau, Alvaro
Bartholomeus, Harm M.
Kooistra, Lammert
Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_full Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_fullStr Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_full_unstemmed Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_short Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_sort comparing riegl ricopter uav lidar derived canopy height and dbh with terrestrial lidar
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29039755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17102371
work_keys_str_mv AT bredebenjamin comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT laualvaro comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT bartholomeusharmm comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT kooistralammert comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar