Cargando…

Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  TC-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical) is a powder agent for endoscopic hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Although most publications are based on case-reports and retrospective studies, data on efficacy are promising. Here we report our experie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahyadi, Oscar, Bauder, Markus, Meier, Benjamin, Caca, Karel, Schmidt, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118794
_version_ 1783277250434564096
author Cahyadi, Oscar
Bauder, Markus
Meier, Benjamin
Caca, Karel
Schmidt, Arthur
author_facet Cahyadi, Oscar
Bauder, Markus
Meier, Benjamin
Caca, Karel
Schmidt, Arthur
author_sort Cahyadi, Oscar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  TC-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical) is a powder agent for endoscopic hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Although most publications are based on case-reports and retrospective studies, data on efficacy are promising. Here we report our experience with TC-325 for diffuse or refractory UGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  Data on patients receiving TC-325 for endoscopic hemostasis from November 2013 to February 2017 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Primary endpoints were technical success (successful immediate hemostasis) and clinical success (effective hemostasis and no recurrent bleeding). Secondary endpoints were recurrent bleeding within 3 and 7 days, hospital mortality and TC-325 associated complications. TC-325 was used for bleeding not amenable to standard endoscopic treatment (e. g. diffuse bleeding) or as salvage therapy after failure of conventional methods RESULTS:  Fifty-two patients received TC-325 treatment. Most of the patients were treated for peptic ulcer bleeding (18/52 patients, 34.6 %) and post-interventional bleeding (13/52 patients, 25 %). Hemospray was used in 23/52 (44.2 %) patients as monotherapy and in 29/52 (55.8 %) patients as a salvage therapy. Application of the powder on the bleeding source was successful in all patients with no therapy-related adverse events (AEs). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 51/52 (98.1 %) patients. Recurrent bleeding within 3 and 7 days was observed in 22/51 and 25/51 patients respectively (43.1 % and 49 %). The overall clinical success was 56.9 % on day 3 and 51 % on day 7. Total mortality was 15.4 % (8 patients), bleeding associated mortality was 3.8 % (2 patients). There were no therapy-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS:  TC-325 showed a high technical success rate as monotherapy for bleeding sources not amenable to standard methods or as an “add-on” therapy after unsuccessful hemostasis. However, rebleeding was frequent in this cohort and further studies are warranted to exactly define a treatment algorithm for TC-325 use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5677459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56774592017-11-09 Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience Cahyadi, Oscar Bauder, Markus Meier, Benjamin Caca, Karel Schmidt, Arthur Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  TC-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical) is a powder agent for endoscopic hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Although most publications are based on case-reports and retrospective studies, data on efficacy are promising. Here we report our experience with TC-325 for diffuse or refractory UGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  Data on patients receiving TC-325 for endoscopic hemostasis from November 2013 to February 2017 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Primary endpoints were technical success (successful immediate hemostasis) and clinical success (effective hemostasis and no recurrent bleeding). Secondary endpoints were recurrent bleeding within 3 and 7 days, hospital mortality and TC-325 associated complications. TC-325 was used for bleeding not amenable to standard endoscopic treatment (e. g. diffuse bleeding) or as salvage therapy after failure of conventional methods RESULTS:  Fifty-two patients received TC-325 treatment. Most of the patients were treated for peptic ulcer bleeding (18/52 patients, 34.6 %) and post-interventional bleeding (13/52 patients, 25 %). Hemospray was used in 23/52 (44.2 %) patients as monotherapy and in 29/52 (55.8 %) patients as a salvage therapy. Application of the powder on the bleeding source was successful in all patients with no therapy-related adverse events (AEs). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 51/52 (98.1 %) patients. Recurrent bleeding within 3 and 7 days was observed in 22/51 and 25/51 patients respectively (43.1 % and 49 %). The overall clinical success was 56.9 % on day 3 and 51 % on day 7. Total mortality was 15.4 % (8 patients), bleeding associated mortality was 3.8 % (2 patients). There were no therapy-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS:  TC-325 showed a high technical success rate as monotherapy for bleeding sources not amenable to standard methods or as an “add-on” therapy after unsuccessful hemostasis. However, rebleeding was frequent in this cohort and further studies are warranted to exactly define a treatment algorithm for TC-325 use. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-11 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5677459/ /pubmed/29124127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118794 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cahyadi, Oscar
Bauder, Markus
Meier, Benjamin
Caca, Karel
Schmidt, Arthur
Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title_full Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title_fullStr Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title_short Effectiveness of TC-325 (Hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
title_sort effectiveness of tc-325 (hemospray) for treatment of diffuse or refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding – a single center experience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118794
work_keys_str_mv AT cahyadioscar effectivenessoftc325hemosprayfortreatmentofdiffuseorrefractoryuppergastrointestinalbleedingasinglecenterexperience
AT baudermarkus effectivenessoftc325hemosprayfortreatmentofdiffuseorrefractoryuppergastrointestinalbleedingasinglecenterexperience
AT meierbenjamin effectivenessoftc325hemosprayfortreatmentofdiffuseorrefractoryuppergastrointestinalbleedingasinglecenterexperience
AT cacakarel effectivenessoftc325hemosprayfortreatmentofdiffuseorrefractoryuppergastrointestinalbleedingasinglecenterexperience
AT schmidtarthur effectivenessoftc325hemosprayfortreatmentofdiffuseorrefractoryuppergastrointestinalbleedingasinglecenterexperience