Cargando…

A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine

Both mean group size (MGS) and mean group density (MGD) are critical indices to characterize a population of cooperatively breeding birds. When a population reaches its carrying capacity, both long‐term MGS and long‐term MGD will remain relatively stable. However, there has been little study of how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ke, Dian‐Hua, Deng, Yan‐Hui, Guo, Wei‐Bin, Huang, Zu‐Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3405
_version_ 1783277259925225472
author Ke, Dian‐Hua
Deng, Yan‐Hui
Guo, Wei‐Bin
Huang, Zu‐Hao
author_facet Ke, Dian‐Hua
Deng, Yan‐Hui
Guo, Wei‐Bin
Huang, Zu‐Hao
author_sort Ke, Dian‐Hua
collection PubMed
description Both mean group size (MGS) and mean group density (MGD) are critical indices to characterize a population of cooperatively breeding birds. When a population reaches its carrying capacity, both long‐term MGS and long‐term MGD will remain relatively stable. However, there has been little study of how these two variables relate. The Masked laughingthrush Garrulax perspicillatus is a cooperatively breeding bird living in fragmented habitats. During 2010 and 2012‐2016, we used song playback to observe and confirm the group sizes and territory ranges of the birds and the data of bird presence to determine habitat suitability. By grouping the nearest territories according to their geographical coordinates, we divided the whole study area into 12 subareas and the whole population into 12 subpopulations. Then, we calculated both MGS and MGD for different time durations for each subpopulation. Finally, using MGD as independent variable and MGS as the dependent variable, we explored the correlations between MGS and MGD by fitting quadratic functions and modeling quadratic regression. Both MGS and MGD were averaged for different time durations and were cross‐related. Our results show that the MGS for more than 2 years significantly correlated with MGD for more than 3 years in a reverse parabolic shape, differing from that of short‐term effects. Our findings suggest that long‐term MGD is a better predictor of long‐term habitat quality and that long‐term MGS is determined by long‐term habitat quality in Masked Laughingthrushes. Based on above findings, we can infer that: (1) Long‐term habitat quality determines the long‐term MGS, but it sets no prerequisite for the status and source of group members; (2) Long‐term MGS in certain populations is adapted to the corresponding level of long‐term habitat quality, it facilitates us to predict the helper effects on current or future survival or reproduction in different situations. These findings and inferences are both helpful for us to understand the evolution of cooperative breeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5677499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56774992017-11-17 A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine Ke, Dian‐Hua Deng, Yan‐Hui Guo, Wei‐Bin Huang, Zu‐Hao Ecol Evol Original Research Both mean group size (MGS) and mean group density (MGD) are critical indices to characterize a population of cooperatively breeding birds. When a population reaches its carrying capacity, both long‐term MGS and long‐term MGD will remain relatively stable. However, there has been little study of how these two variables relate. The Masked laughingthrush Garrulax perspicillatus is a cooperatively breeding bird living in fragmented habitats. During 2010 and 2012‐2016, we used song playback to observe and confirm the group sizes and territory ranges of the birds and the data of bird presence to determine habitat suitability. By grouping the nearest territories according to their geographical coordinates, we divided the whole study area into 12 subareas and the whole population into 12 subpopulations. Then, we calculated both MGS and MGD for different time durations for each subpopulation. Finally, using MGD as independent variable and MGS as the dependent variable, we explored the correlations between MGS and MGD by fitting quadratic functions and modeling quadratic regression. Both MGS and MGD were averaged for different time durations and were cross‐related. Our results show that the MGS for more than 2 years significantly correlated with MGD for more than 3 years in a reverse parabolic shape, differing from that of short‐term effects. Our findings suggest that long‐term MGD is a better predictor of long‐term habitat quality and that long‐term MGS is determined by long‐term habitat quality in Masked Laughingthrushes. Based on above findings, we can infer that: (1) Long‐term habitat quality determines the long‐term MGS, but it sets no prerequisite for the status and source of group members; (2) Long‐term MGS in certain populations is adapted to the corresponding level of long‐term habitat quality, it facilitates us to predict the helper effects on current or future survival or reproduction in different situations. These findings and inferences are both helpful for us to understand the evolution of cooperative breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5677499/ /pubmed/29152172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3405 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ke, Dian‐Hua
Deng, Yan‐Hui
Guo, Wei‐Bin
Huang, Zu‐Hao
A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title_full A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title_fullStr A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title_full_unstemmed A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title_short A quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
title_sort quadratic correlation between long‐term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3405
work_keys_str_mv AT kedianhua aquadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT dengyanhui aquadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT guoweibin aquadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT huangzuhao aquadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT kedianhua quadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT dengyanhui quadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT guoweibin quadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine
AT huangzuhao quadraticcorrelationbetweenlongtermmeangroupsizeandgroupdensityinacooperativelybreedingpasserine