Cargando…

A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3-level hybrid surgery (HS), which combines fusion and cervical disc replacement (CDR), compared to 3-level fusionin patient with cervical spondylosis involving 3 levels. METHODS: Patients in the anterior cervical discect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Seo-Ryang, Lee, Sang-Bok, Cho, Kyoung-Suok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.1010.013
_version_ 1783277358424260608
author Jang, Seo-Ryang
Lee, Sang-Bok
Cho, Kyoung-Suok
author_facet Jang, Seo-Ryang
Lee, Sang-Bok
Cho, Kyoung-Suok
author_sort Jang, Seo-Ryang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3-level hybrid surgery (HS), which combines fusion and cervical disc replacement (CDR), compared to 3-level fusionin patient with cervical spondylosis involving 3 levels. METHODS: Patients in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) group (n=30) underwent 3-level fusion and the HS group (n=19) underwent combined surgery with fusion and CDR. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale for the arm, the neck disability index (NDI), Odom criteria and postoperative complications. The cervical range of motion (ROM), fusion rate and adjacent segments degeneration were assessed with radiographs. RESULTS: Significant improvements in arm pain relief and functional outcome were observed in ACDF and HS group. The NDI in the HS group showed better improvement 6 months after surgery than that of the ACDF group. The ACDF group had a lower fusion rate, higher incidence of device related complications and radiological changes in adjacent segments compared with the HS group. The better recovery of cervical ROM was observed in HS group. However, that of the ACDF group was significantly decreased and did not recover. CONCLUSION: The HS group was better than the ACDF group in terms of NDI, cervical ROM, fusion rate, incidence of postoperative complications and adjacent segment degeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56780572017-11-15 A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease Jang, Seo-Ryang Lee, Sang-Bok Cho, Kyoung-Suok J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3-level hybrid surgery (HS), which combines fusion and cervical disc replacement (CDR), compared to 3-level fusionin patient with cervical spondylosis involving 3 levels. METHODS: Patients in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) group (n=30) underwent 3-level fusion and the HS group (n=19) underwent combined surgery with fusion and CDR. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale for the arm, the neck disability index (NDI), Odom criteria and postoperative complications. The cervical range of motion (ROM), fusion rate and adjacent segments degeneration were assessed with radiographs. RESULTS: Significant improvements in arm pain relief and functional outcome were observed in ACDF and HS group. The NDI in the HS group showed better improvement 6 months after surgery than that of the ACDF group. The ACDF group had a lower fusion rate, higher incidence of device related complications and radiological changes in adjacent segments compared with the HS group. The better recovery of cervical ROM was observed in HS group. However, that of the ACDF group was significantly decreased and did not recover. CONCLUSION: The HS group was better than the ACDF group in terms of NDI, cervical ROM, fusion rate, incidence of postoperative complications and adjacent segment degeneration. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2017-11 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5678057/ /pubmed/29142627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.1010.013 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Neurosurgical Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Jang, Seo-Ryang
Lee, Sang-Bok
Cho, Kyoung-Suok
A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title_full A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title_fullStr A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title_short A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Fusion Combined with Artificial Disc Replacement for Treating 3-Level Cervical Spondylotic Disease
title_sort comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus fusion combined with artificial disc replacement for treating 3-level cervical spondylotic disease
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.1010.013
work_keys_str_mv AT jangseoryang acomparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease
AT leesangbok acomparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease
AT chokyoungsuok acomparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease
AT jangseoryang comparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease
AT leesangbok comparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease
AT chokyoungsuok comparisonofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionversusfusioncombinedwithartificialdiscreplacementfortreating3levelcervicalspondyloticdisease