Cargando…

Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India

Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shewade, Hemant Deepak, Vidhubala, E, Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar, Lal, Pranay, Bhatt, Neelam, Sundaramoorthi, C., Singh, Rana J., Kumar, Ajay M. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763
_version_ 1783277397119860736
author Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Vidhubala, E
Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar
Lal, Pranay
Bhatt, Neelam
Sundaramoorthi, C.
Singh, Rana J.
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
author_facet Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Vidhubala, E
Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar
Lal, Pranay
Bhatt, Neelam
Sundaramoorthi, C.
Singh, Rana J.
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
author_sort Shewade, Hemant Deepak
collection PubMed
description Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike the GATS-India, 2009–2010, which used hand-held computer devices) while data entry was done using open access tools. The objective of this paper is to describe the process of data entry and assess its quality assurance and efficiency. Methods: In EpiData language, a variable is referred to as ‘field’ and a questionnaire (set of fields) as ‘record’. EpiData software was used for double data entry with adequate checks followed by validation. Teamviewer was used for remote training and trouble shooting. The EpiData databases (one each for each district and each zone in Chennai city) were housed in shared Dropbox folders, which enabled secure sharing of files and automatic back-up. Each database for a district/zone had separate file for data entry of household level and individual level questionnaire. Results: Of 32,945 households, there were 111,363 individuals aged ≥15 years. The average proportion of records with data entry errors for a district/zone in household level and individual level file was 4% and 24%, respectively. These are the errors that would have gone unnoticed if single entry was used. The median (inter-quartile range) time taken for double data entry for a single household level and individual level questionnaire was 30 (24, 40) s and 86 (64, 126) s, respectively. Conclusion: Efficient and quality-assured near-real-time data entry in a large sub-national tobacco survey was performed using innovative, resource-efficient use of open access tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56782232017-11-17 Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India Shewade, Hemant Deepak Vidhubala, E Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar Lal, Pranay Bhatt, Neelam Sundaramoorthi, C. Singh, Rana J. Kumar, Ajay M. V. Glob Health Action Methods Forum Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike the GATS-India, 2009–2010, which used hand-held computer devices) while data entry was done using open access tools. The objective of this paper is to describe the process of data entry and assess its quality assurance and efficiency. Methods: In EpiData language, a variable is referred to as ‘field’ and a questionnaire (set of fields) as ‘record’. EpiData software was used for double data entry with adequate checks followed by validation. Teamviewer was used for remote training and trouble shooting. The EpiData databases (one each for each district and each zone in Chennai city) were housed in shared Dropbox folders, which enabled secure sharing of files and automatic back-up. Each database for a district/zone had separate file for data entry of household level and individual level questionnaire. Results: Of 32,945 households, there were 111,363 individuals aged ≥15 years. The average proportion of records with data entry errors for a district/zone in household level and individual level file was 4% and 24%, respectively. These are the errors that would have gone unnoticed if single entry was used. The median (inter-quartile range) time taken for double data entry for a single household level and individual level questionnaire was 30 (24, 40) s and 86 (64, 126) s, respectively. Conclusion: Efficient and quality-assured near-real-time data entry in a large sub-national tobacco survey was performed using innovative, resource-efficient use of open access tools. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5678223/ /pubmed/29092673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Forum
Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Vidhubala, E
Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar
Lal, Pranay
Bhatt, Neelam
Sundaramoorthi, C.
Singh, Rana J.
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title_full Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title_fullStr Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title_full_unstemmed Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title_short Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
title_sort open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in india
topic Methods Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763
work_keys_str_mv AT shewadehemantdeepak openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT vidhubalae openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT subramanidivyarajprabhakar openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT lalpranay openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT bhattneelam openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT sundaramoorthic openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT singhranaj openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia
AT kumarajaymv openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia