Cargando…
Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India
Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763 |
_version_ | 1783277397119860736 |
---|---|
author | Shewade, Hemant Deepak Vidhubala, E Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar Lal, Pranay Bhatt, Neelam Sundaramoorthi, C. Singh, Rana J. Kumar, Ajay M. V. |
author_facet | Shewade, Hemant Deepak Vidhubala, E Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar Lal, Pranay Bhatt, Neelam Sundaramoorthi, C. Singh, Rana J. Kumar, Ajay M. V. |
author_sort | Shewade, Hemant Deepak |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike the GATS-India, 2009–2010, which used hand-held computer devices) while data entry was done using open access tools. The objective of this paper is to describe the process of data entry and assess its quality assurance and efficiency. Methods: In EpiData language, a variable is referred to as ‘field’ and a questionnaire (set of fields) as ‘record’. EpiData software was used for double data entry with adequate checks followed by validation. Teamviewer was used for remote training and trouble shooting. The EpiData databases (one each for each district and each zone in Chennai city) were housed in shared Dropbox folders, which enabled secure sharing of files and automatic back-up. Each database for a district/zone had separate file for data entry of household level and individual level questionnaire. Results: Of 32,945 households, there were 111,363 individuals aged ≥15 years. The average proportion of records with data entry errors for a district/zone in household level and individual level file was 4% and 24%, respectively. These are the errors that would have gone unnoticed if single entry was used. The median (inter-quartile range) time taken for double data entry for a single household level and individual level questionnaire was 30 (24, 40) s and 86 (64, 126) s, respectively. Conclusion: Efficient and quality-assured near-real-time data entry in a large sub-national tobacco survey was performed using innovative, resource-efficient use of open access tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5678223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56782232017-11-17 Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India Shewade, Hemant Deepak Vidhubala, E Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar Lal, Pranay Bhatt, Neelam Sundaramoorthi, C. Singh, Rana J. Kumar, Ajay M. V. Glob Health Action Methods Forum Background: A large state-wide tobacco survey was conducted using modified version of pretested, globally validated Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire in 2015–22016 in Tamil Nadu, India. Due to resource constrains, data collection was carrid out using paper-based questionnaires (unlike the GATS-India, 2009–2010, which used hand-held computer devices) while data entry was done using open access tools. The objective of this paper is to describe the process of data entry and assess its quality assurance and efficiency. Methods: In EpiData language, a variable is referred to as ‘field’ and a questionnaire (set of fields) as ‘record’. EpiData software was used for double data entry with adequate checks followed by validation. Teamviewer was used for remote training and trouble shooting. The EpiData databases (one each for each district and each zone in Chennai city) were housed in shared Dropbox folders, which enabled secure sharing of files and automatic back-up. Each database for a district/zone had separate file for data entry of household level and individual level questionnaire. Results: Of 32,945 households, there were 111,363 individuals aged ≥15 years. The average proportion of records with data entry errors for a district/zone in household level and individual level file was 4% and 24%, respectively. These are the errors that would have gone unnoticed if single entry was used. The median (inter-quartile range) time taken for double data entry for a single household level and individual level questionnaire was 30 (24, 40) s and 86 (64, 126) s, respectively. Conclusion: Efficient and quality-assured near-real-time data entry in a large sub-national tobacco survey was performed using innovative, resource-efficient use of open access tools. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5678223/ /pubmed/29092673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Forum Shewade, Hemant Deepak Vidhubala, E Subramani, Divyaraj Prabhakar Lal, Pranay Bhatt, Neelam Sundaramoorthi, C. Singh, Rana J. Kumar, Ajay M. V. Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title | Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title_full | Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title_fullStr | Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title_short | Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India |
title_sort | open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in india |
topic | Methods Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1394763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shewadehemantdeepak openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT vidhubalae openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT subramanidivyarajprabhakar openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT lalpranay openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT bhattneelam openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT sundaramoorthic openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT singhranaj openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia AT kumarajaymv openaccesstoolsforqualityassuredandefficientdataentryinalargestatewidetobaccosurveyinindia |