Cargando…

Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to elucidate the causes and level of visual impairment (VI) in patients with different pathologies of diabetic retinopathy (DR) who presented to a low vision care (LVC) clinic, to analyze the type of distant and near devices prescribed to them and the visual benefit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gopalakrishnan, Sarika, Muralidharan, Aishwarya, Susheel, Shwetha Chambayil, Raman, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_52_17
_version_ 1783277422557265920
author Gopalakrishnan, Sarika
Muralidharan, Aishwarya
Susheel, Shwetha Chambayil
Raman, Rajiv
author_facet Gopalakrishnan, Sarika
Muralidharan, Aishwarya
Susheel, Shwetha Chambayil
Raman, Rajiv
author_sort Gopalakrishnan, Sarika
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to elucidate the causes and level of visual impairment (VI) in patients with different pathologies of diabetic retinopathy (DR) who presented to a low vision care (LVC) clinic, to analyze the type of distant and near devices prescribed to them and the visual benefits thereof. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done for 100 consecutive patients with DR who were referred to the LVC clinic from June 2015 to June 2016. The reason for referral was assessed from the electronic medical records and available fundus photographs, fundus fluorescein angiograms, and optical coherence tomography images by a retina specialist. The details of low-vision devices and subsequent improvements were noted. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 52% had moderate VI, 19% mild VI, 16% severe VI, and 13% had profound VI or blindness. The most commonly prescribed low vision device was half-eye spectacles (38.4%). The pathologies which had statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in distance vision with low vision devices were DR with disc pallor (4.4% improvement), ischemic maculopathy (11.9% improvement), and plaque of hard exudate (10.1% improvement). However, in all pathologies, there was statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in near vision. CONCLUSION: Usually, the patients with DR presented to the LVC clinic with moderate VI. The use of low vision devices can help these patients in cases where medical and surgical treatment have no or a limited role in restoring useful vision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56783382017-11-28 Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy Gopalakrishnan, Sarika Muralidharan, Aishwarya Susheel, Shwetha Chambayil Raman, Rajiv Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to elucidate the causes and level of visual impairment (VI) in patients with different pathologies of diabetic retinopathy (DR) who presented to a low vision care (LVC) clinic, to analyze the type of distant and near devices prescribed to them and the visual benefits thereof. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done for 100 consecutive patients with DR who were referred to the LVC clinic from June 2015 to June 2016. The reason for referral was assessed from the electronic medical records and available fundus photographs, fundus fluorescein angiograms, and optical coherence tomography images by a retina specialist. The details of low-vision devices and subsequent improvements were noted. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 52% had moderate VI, 19% mild VI, 16% severe VI, and 13% had profound VI or blindness. The most commonly prescribed low vision device was half-eye spectacles (38.4%). The pathologies which had statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in distance vision with low vision devices were DR with disc pallor (4.4% improvement), ischemic maculopathy (11.9% improvement), and plaque of hard exudate (10.1% improvement). However, in all pathologies, there was statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in near vision. CONCLUSION: Usually, the patients with DR presented to the LVC clinic with moderate VI. The use of low vision devices can help these patients in cases where medical and surgical treatment have no or a limited role in restoring useful vision. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5678338/ /pubmed/29044067 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_52_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gopalakrishnan, Sarika
Muralidharan, Aishwarya
Susheel, Shwetha Chambayil
Raman, Rajiv
Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title_full Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title_fullStr Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title_short Improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
title_sort improvement in distance and near visual acuities using low vision devices in diabetic retinopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_52_17
work_keys_str_mv AT gopalakrishnansarika improvementindistanceandnearvisualacuitiesusinglowvisiondevicesindiabeticretinopathy
AT muralidharanaishwarya improvementindistanceandnearvisualacuitiesusinglowvisiondevicesindiabeticretinopathy
AT susheelshwethachambayil improvementindistanceandnearvisualacuitiesusinglowvisiondevicesindiabeticretinopathy
AT ramanrajiv improvementindistanceandnearvisualacuitiesusinglowvisiondevicesindiabeticretinopathy