Cargando…

Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE: Many patients who undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) replacement are often upsized to larger cylinders, suggesting the IPP may serve as a tissue expander and increase internal penile length. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cylinder length increases with subseque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Paul H., Siegel, Jordan A., Tausch, Timothy J., Klein, Alexandra K., Scott, Jeremy M., Morey, Allen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28537700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0528
_version_ 1783277454010351616
author Chung, Paul H.
Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Klein, Alexandra K.
Scott, Jeremy M.
Morey, Allen F.
author_facet Chung, Paul H.
Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Klein, Alexandra K.
Scott, Jeremy M.
Morey, Allen F.
author_sort Chung, Paul H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Many patients who undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) replacement are often upsized to larger cylinders, suggesting the IPP may serve as a tissue expander and increase internal penile length. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cylinder length increases with subsequent IPP insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried American Medical Systems and Coloplast Patient Information Form databases to identify patients who underwent IPP placement and replacement between 2004-2013. Patients were grouped by device type and time to replacement (<2 or ≥2 years). We selected the 2-year mark for subgroup analysis to allow time for tissue expansion to occur and to exclude patients who underwent early explantation (e.g. erosion or infection). RESULTS: Two thousand, seven hundred and forty nine patients (1,532 AMS 700 LGX, 717 AMS 700 CX, and 500 Coloplast Titan) met the inclusion criteria. Mean time between implants was earlier for LGX (29 months) than CX (39 months) and Titan (48 months) patients (p<0.001). Patients who underwent device replacement at <2 years did not experience an increase in mean cylinder length. On the contrary, patients who underwent device replacement at ≥2 years did experience significant increases in mean cylinder length (LGX 1.2 cm, CX 1.1 cm, and Titan 0.9 cm, p<0.001). The mean increases in length at ≥2 years were similar between the 3 devices (p=0.20). Sixty percent of patients demonstrated increases of >0.5 cm and 40% demonstrated increases of ≥1 cm. CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated, the IPP may provide tissue expansion over time. Further evaluation is needed to determine if increased cylinder length correlates to increased functional length and patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56785242017-11-16 Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence? Chung, Paul H. Siegel, Jordan A. Tausch, Timothy J. Klein, Alexandra K. Scott, Jeremy M. Morey, Allen F. Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Many patients who undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) replacement are often upsized to larger cylinders, suggesting the IPP may serve as a tissue expander and increase internal penile length. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cylinder length increases with subsequent IPP insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried American Medical Systems and Coloplast Patient Information Form databases to identify patients who underwent IPP placement and replacement between 2004-2013. Patients were grouped by device type and time to replacement (<2 or ≥2 years). We selected the 2-year mark for subgroup analysis to allow time for tissue expansion to occur and to exclude patients who underwent early explantation (e.g. erosion or infection). RESULTS: Two thousand, seven hundred and forty nine patients (1,532 AMS 700 LGX, 717 AMS 700 CX, and 500 Coloplast Titan) met the inclusion criteria. Mean time between implants was earlier for LGX (29 months) than CX (39 months) and Titan (48 months) patients (p<0.001). Patients who underwent device replacement at <2 years did not experience an increase in mean cylinder length. On the contrary, patients who underwent device replacement at ≥2 years did experience significant increases in mean cylinder length (LGX 1.2 cm, CX 1.1 cm, and Titan 0.9 cm, p<0.001). The mean increases in length at ≥2 years were similar between the 3 devices (p=0.20). Sixty percent of patients demonstrated increases of >0.5 cm and 40% demonstrated increases of ≥1 cm. CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated, the IPP may provide tissue expansion over time. Further evaluation is needed to determine if increased cylinder length correlates to increased functional length and patient satisfaction. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5678524/ /pubmed/28537700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0528 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Paul H.
Siegel, Jordan A.
Tausch, Timothy J.
Klein, Alexandra K.
Scott, Jeremy M.
Morey, Allen F.
Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title_full Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title_fullStr Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title_short Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
title_sort inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28537700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0528
work_keys_str_mv AT chungpaulh inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence
AT siegeljordana inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence
AT tauschtimothyj inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence
AT kleinalexandrak inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence
AT scottjeremym inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence
AT moreyallenf inflatablepenileprosthesisastissueexpanderwhatistheevidence