Cargando…

Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Multiple options exist for the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We report on our 10-year experience using the inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation (EVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient characteristics of age, gender, and reflux grad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yap, Michael, Nseyo, Unwanabong, Din, Hena, Alagiri, Madhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28128899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0179
_version_ 1783277454248378368
author Yap, Michael
Nseyo, Unwanabong
Din, Hena
Alagiri, Madhu
author_facet Yap, Michael
Nseyo, Unwanabong
Din, Hena
Alagiri, Madhu
author_sort Yap, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Multiple options exist for the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We report on our 10-year experience using the inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation (EVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient characteristics of age, gender, and reflux grade were obtained and outcomes of operative time, hospital stay, and radiographic resolution were assessed. RESULTS: 71 girls and 20 boys with a mean age of 74 months (range 14-164) underwent inguinal EVR via a 3.5-cm inguinal mini-incision. Mean follow up was 10.9 months (range 0.4-69.7). Average grade of reflux was 2.80. Average operative time was 91 minutes (range 51-268). The procedure was successful in 87 of 91 patients (95.6%). The 3 cases of reflux that persisted were all grade 1 and managed expectantly. Contralateral reflux developed in 9 cases, all of which resolved after treatment with either Deflux or ureteral reimplant. There were 4 case of urinary retention that resolved after a brief period of CIC or indwelling catheterization. There were no cases of ureteral obstruction. Most patients were discharged on post-operative day 1 (85/91) and no hospitalization extended beyond 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation should be considered as a potentially minimally invasive alternative to endoscopic and robotic treatment of VUR with a success rate more comparable to traditional open approaches. We feel it is the method of choice in cases of unilateral VUR requiring surgical correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56785252017-11-16 Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience Yap, Michael Nseyo, Unwanabong Din, Hena Alagiri, Madhu Int Braz J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Multiple options exist for the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We report on our 10-year experience using the inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation (EVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient characteristics of age, gender, and reflux grade were obtained and outcomes of operative time, hospital stay, and radiographic resolution were assessed. RESULTS: 71 girls and 20 boys with a mean age of 74 months (range 14-164) underwent inguinal EVR via a 3.5-cm inguinal mini-incision. Mean follow up was 10.9 months (range 0.4-69.7). Average grade of reflux was 2.80. Average operative time was 91 minutes (range 51-268). The procedure was successful in 87 of 91 patients (95.6%). The 3 cases of reflux that persisted were all grade 1 and managed expectantly. Contralateral reflux developed in 9 cases, all of which resolved after treatment with either Deflux or ureteral reimplant. There were 4 case of urinary retention that resolved after a brief period of CIC or indwelling catheterization. There were no cases of ureteral obstruction. Most patients were discharged on post-operative day 1 (85/91) and no hospitalization extended beyond 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation should be considered as a potentially minimally invasive alternative to endoscopic and robotic treatment of VUR with a success rate more comparable to traditional open approaches. We feel it is the method of choice in cases of unilateral VUR requiring surgical correction. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5678525/ /pubmed/28128899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0179 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yap, Michael
Nseyo, Unwanabong
Din, Hena
Alagiri, Madhu
Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title_full Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title_fullStr Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title_short Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
title_sort unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28128899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0179
work_keys_str_mv AT yapmichael unilateralextravesicalureteralreimplantationviainguinalincisionforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxa10yearexperience
AT nseyounwanabong unilateralextravesicalureteralreimplantationviainguinalincisionforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxa10yearexperience
AT dinhena unilateralextravesicalureteralreimplantationviainguinalincisionforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxa10yearexperience
AT alagirimadhu unilateralextravesicalureteralreimplantationviainguinalincisionforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxa10yearexperience